Nasa TT Chit Chat
I don't realy run anymore but I think the best setup would be a reclass to TTC* at around 2700lbs
with probably a F22 motor and intake/exhaust/ECU and detune it a bit up top
+5 shocks/springs
+4 wing
+3 225 R7
thats it
with probably a F22 motor and intake/exhaust/ECU and detune it a bit up top
+5 shocks/springs
+4 wing
+3 225 R7
thats it
So I tried one last attempt with Greg to see if the Mugen hardtop could be allowed in TT3 without taking the Modified OEM Roof Line points, but he wasn't having it. So if you show up in a TT3 with all OEM aero except a Mugen hardtop you are dinged .7 by losing the .4 for OEM aero and taking the -.3 for Modified OEM Roof Line. I don't believe that was ever truly the intent of the rule, but Greg didn't seem like he wanted to change it to read differently.
So I tried one last attempt with Greg to see if the Mugen hardtop could be allowed in TT3 without taking the Modified OEM Roof Line points, but he wasn't having it. So if you show up in a TT3 with all OEM aero except a Mugen hardtop you are dinged .7 by losing the .4 for OEM aero and taking the -.3 for Modified OEM Roof Line. I don't believe that was ever truly the intent of the rule, but Greg didn't seem like he wanted to change it to read differently.
i know there is fluid dynamic analysis, that show a Spoon hardtop is a clear advantage. And Im fairly certain I could even expand on that advantage. I have my own doubts that a Mugen top provides anything significant. However, given that there are clear examples where non-OEM hardtops are advantageous, NASA really has no choice but to assess modification points/factors to non OEM equipment. And honestly, it's pretty much like that with everything we do that's non-OEM, not just tops. Some of those assessments also apply to things of questionable aerodynamic value given the points/modification factor (i.e. CR aerodynamics)
Good news is with the Mugen top assessment, you could go aero crazy; underbody tray, diffuser, wings, etc
So I tried one last attempt with Greg to see if the Mugen hardtop could be allowed in TT3 without taking the Modified OEM Roof Line points, but he wasn't having it. So if you show up in a TT3 with all OEM aero except a Mugen hardtop you are dinged .7 by losing the .4 for OEM aero and taking the -.3 for Modified OEM Roof Line. I don't believe that was ever truly the intent of the rule, but Greg didn't seem like he wanted to change it to read differently.
Originally Posted by King Tut' timestamp='1455877896' post='23884865
So I tried one last attempt with Greg to see if the Mugen hardtop could be allowed in TT3 without taking the Modified OEM Roof Line points, but he wasn't having it. So if you show up in a TT3 with all OEM aero except a Mugen hardtop you are dinged .7 by losing the .4 for OEM aero and taking the -.3 for Modified OEM Roof Line. I don't believe that was ever truly the intent of the rule, but Greg didn't seem like he wanted to change it to read differently.
Originally Posted by BlueBarchetta' timestamp='1455907344' post='23885308
[quote name='King Tut' timestamp='1455877896' post='23884865']
So I tried one last attempt with Greg to see if the Mugen hardtop could be allowed in TT3 without taking the Modified OEM Roof Line points, but he wasn't having it. So if you show up in a TT3 with all OEM aero except a Mugen hardtop you are dinged .7 by losing the .4 for OEM aero and taking the -.3 for Modified OEM Roof Line. I don't believe that was ever truly the intent of the rule, but Greg didn't seem like he wanted to change it to read differently.
So I tried one last attempt with Greg to see if the Mugen hardtop could be allowed in TT3 without taking the Modified OEM Roof Line points, but he wasn't having it. So if you show up in a TT3 with all OEM aero except a Mugen hardtop you are dinged .7 by losing the .4 for OEM aero and taking the -.3 for Modified OEM Roof Line. I don't believe that was ever truly the intent of the rule, but Greg didn't seem like he wanted to change it to read differently.
[/quote]
Don't disagree with you in principle. I just know he's gonna stick with a strict interpretation of "altering the roofline". And since the TT/PT rules are merging into ST/TT, he will stay consistent with prior interpretations







