S2000 Racing and Competition The S2000 on the track and Solo circuit. Some of the fastest S2000 drivers in the world call this forum home.

Raking the S2000 - An Idea for Putting Down Power

Thread Tools
 
Old 11-13-2017, 03:03 PM
  #11  

 
Chibo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Scottsdale, Az
Posts: 1,321
Received 123 Likes on 98 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by thomsbrain
I think you should consider fixing your wacky spring rates so that you don't need to run a huge rear bar before you start playing with rake.
He doesn't need to run a huge rear bar with those rates... I actually looked up the rate on an AP1 rear bar (427 lbs/in), which would explain a lot. I'm 15k/11k and run a little bit lighter than a Miata rear bar (179lb).
Old 11-13-2017, 08:03 PM
  #12  
Registered User

 
DefSport's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 211
Likes: 0
Received 23 Likes on 17 Posts
Default

What are you doing for bumpsteer? The AP1 bumpsteer geometry is very severe in the rear, so you can end up chasing your tail on the rear on transient events due to the rear bumpsteer being all over the place.
Old 11-13-2017, 08:22 PM
  #13  
Registered User

Thread Starter
 
dsddcd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 3,964
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by thomsbrain
I think you should consider fixing your wacky spring rates so that you don't need to run a huge rear bar before you start playing with rake.
See below responces

Originally Posted by Chibo
He doesn't need to run a huge rear bar with those rates... I actually looked up the rate on an AP1 rear bar (427 lbs/in), which would explain a lot. I'm 15k/11k and run a little bit lighter than a Miata rear bar (179lb).
Yes you are correct, I am chasing points so I chose springs to give an equivalent motion ratio given the chosen front spring rate. I derived those rates based on information Rob Robinette published and my own R&D. Here is a small portion of the overview page. The front spring rate was chosen by consulting others with winning cars and my own experiences leaving on the rear spring to tune the bias. Note I run the car heavy 2900# so I needed a bit more spring than others might normally choose with a stripped car.




Originally Posted by DefSport
What are you doing for bumpsteer? The AP1 bumpsteer geometry is very severe in the rear, so you can end up chasing your tail on the rear on transient events due to the rear bumpsteer being all over the place.
The rear was very important first to correct the AP1 geometry and second for the ability to run more camber. At the same time checked the front which was not a problem at my ride height.


Thank you again all that are sharing!
Old 11-14-2017, 07:15 AM
  #14  

 
Chibo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Scottsdale, Az
Posts: 1,321
Received 123 Likes on 98 Posts
Default

That spreadsheet looks interesting
Old 11-14-2017, 10:43 AM
  #15  

 
ViperASR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 2,049
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

The very strong rumor is that TTC is going away for TT4/5 next year. My advice would be to get sway bars to fix the issue and not worry about points.
TTC is going to end up split across TT4 and TT5, with the idea of TTD cars being able to slot into TT5.
The following users liked this post:
dsddcd (11-15-2017)
Old 11-14-2017, 12:20 PM
  #16  

 
thomsbrain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Windsor, CA
Posts: 2,630
Received 39 Likes on 34 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by dsddcd
Yes you are correct, I am chasing points so I chose springs to give an equivalent motion ratio given the chosen front spring rate. I derived those rates based on information Rob Robinette published and my own R&D. Here is a small portion of the overview page. The front spring rate was chosen by consulting others with winning cars and my own experiences leaving on the rear spring to tune the bias. Note I run the car heavy 2900# so I needed a bit more spring than others might normally choose with a stripped car.
I'm confused, do you take a points hit by changing the stock rear sway bar or removing it? A 16k/12k spring stagger on the S2000 gives ride frequencies of roughly 2.03 Hz front and 1.72 Hz rear (depending on the motion ratio you use; there are a few different numbers floating around for the S2000). Your front frequency is 18% higher than the rear, which is completely backwards from what it should be. The general rule of thumb is to shoot for rear frequency 10% higher than front because the rear needs to respond faster than the front in order for all first-order suspension movements to resolve at roughly the same time after hitting a bump.
Old 11-14-2017, 05:42 PM
  #17  
Former Moderator

 
robrob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: West Virginia
Posts: 4,634
Received 26 Likes on 25 Posts
Default

I tried a little rake in my car and it definitely liked having the rear as low as possible. Every time I raised the rear ride height I lost lap time.
Old 11-15-2017, 01:07 PM
  #18  
Registered User

 
InsaneSp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 1,481
Received 27 Likes on 23 Posts
Default

What turns at what tracks are you having issues putting power down? Are you waiting on the nose? Wheelspin?
Old 11-15-2017, 02:00 PM
  #19  

 
michaelnyden's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,167
Received 12 Likes on 12 Posts
Default

Maybe try hondata traction control (it's adjustable on the fly).
Old 11-15-2017, 03:21 PM
  #20  

 
Jimbo_STWOK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 176
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

I had the same issues on corner exit. Vtec Crossover didn't help either, but what did help me the most was disconnecting the rear sway entirely. I recently switched to a higher sprung setup from my Ohlins and it only got better. I feel it's more of a ratio f/r than a largr lbs/in game.


Quick Reply: Raking the S2000 - An Idea for Putting Down Power



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:31 PM.