S2000 Racing and Competition The S2000 on the track and Solo circuit. Some of the fastest S2000 drivers in the world call this forum home.

Rolling resistance

Thread Tools
 
Old Feb 8, 2008 | 11:34 AM
  #11  
ShocK's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,540
Likes: 0
From: Lexington, Ky
Default

Originally Posted by ShocK,Feb 7 2008, 10:35 PM
Does rim size have an effect here?
Well?
Reply
Old Feb 8, 2008 | 11:35 AM
  #12  
Antonov's Avatar
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 4,762
Likes: 3
From: San Diego
Default

Originally Posted by INTJ,Feb 8 2008, 10:09 AM
You can get a hartop and run consumer high efficiency tires. I'm not sure why you would though. The low hysteresis tires suck at handling.
but they're bouncy
Reply
Old Feb 8, 2008 | 01:14 PM
  #13  
krazik's Avatar
Administrator
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 17,004
Likes: 7
From: Santa Cruz, CA, US
Default

ok enuf joking. wtf are you asking for?

You doing some land speed runs in the s2k?
Reply
Old Feb 8, 2008 | 01:50 PM
  #14  
ShocK's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,540
Likes: 0
From: Lexington, Ky
Default

Originally Posted by krazik,Feb 8 2008, 05:14 PM
ok enuf joking. wtf are you asking for?

You doing some land speed runs in the s2k?
lol no I was just curious, my car seems to be somewhat hard to roll around on level ground. I read that tread depth and sidewall size can play a large role so I guess that answers some of the reason why. I was also curious if rim size had an effect once rolling, how can you say when is too big? Generally I've seen 17's and heard 17's to be the best size but is there any technical background behind that assumption?

Aerodynamically Cd what would be a good choice for a bumper? I heard the AP2 front is an improvement. Is it actually worth worrying about?
Reply
Old Feb 8, 2008 | 06:07 PM
  #15  
Ludedude's Avatar
Administrator
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 15,835
Likes: 1
From: Vegas Baby, Vegas
Default

What you're describing is a result of a) toe and b) tread width/contact patch. Try rolling the car by pushing or rolling from the top of the tire itself and not the bumper.

Reply
Old Feb 8, 2008 | 10:31 PM
  #16  
cthree's Avatar
Administrator
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 20,274
Likes: 4
From: Toronto, Canada
Default

wheel size doesn't make any difference but wider tires will definitely add resistance. It's a trade-off between cornering speed and top-end. On a tight track you will be faster with wider tires and on a track with long straights you may be giving back as much as you gain.
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2008 | 07:36 AM
  #17  
INTJ's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 8,504
Likes: 0
Default

Wheel diameter makes a significant difference in rolling resistance, just look at all the testing on mtb bike wheels with 24 vs 26 vs 29. But we are constrained by wheel well limitations. Just run stocks.
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2008 | 09:05 AM
  #18  
neurotic's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 253
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by Ludedude,Feb 8 2008, 07:07 PM
What you're describing is a result of a) toe and b) tread width/contact patch. Try rolling the car by pushing or rolling from the top of the tire itself and not the bumper.
Added resistance could also be a sign of: the brake pads dragging, problems with the wheel bearings, the vehicle is in gear, the parking brake is applied, or a/the tire(s) are under-inflated.
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2008 | 10:21 AM
  #19  
ShocK's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,540
Likes: 0
From: Lexington, Ky
Default

MTB test http://www.cyclingnews.com/tech.php?id=tec...s/29invs26inpt1



So if all this is true, why does it seem that 17's do better on the track, even Honda went to 17's, of course wider would be better in the corners, but is the difference not large enough for us to notice? How can you say whats too small and whats too large? Pros and cons to both sides I guess.
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2008 | 10:24 AM
  #20  
krazik's Avatar
Administrator
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 17,004
Likes: 7
From: Santa Cruz, CA, US
Default

what makes you think rolling resistance (unless you have the e-brake on) has any significant affect on lap times? Hence the joke on spare tires. You can have very little rolling resistance w/ tiny tires, but your lap times on a course w/ turns in gonna be VERY slow. If you're going for landspeed runs then you care about drag and rolling resistance.

I knew this question was the reason for the thread.

BTW They're talking about total diameter, not the diameter of the wheel.

-Ry
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:42 PM.