View Poll Results: When is a weight difference significant?
Voters: 119. You may not vote on this poll
SCCA Solo - STR Rules Discussion
I'm reading through this battle now...
This may open a can of worms, but this came up at the last autocross I was at. . . What are your thoughts on a 1.8 NA Miata running in STR? With these Toyos and the fact that the STS raw times don't seem to be too far off the STR raw times, could an NA 1.8 on the Toyos be a threat in STR and no one has really built one yet?
This may open a can of worms, but this came up at the last autocross I was at. . . What are your thoughts on a 1.8 NA Miata running in STR? With these Toyos and the fact that the STS raw times don't seem to be too far off the STR raw times, could an NA 1.8 on the Toyos be a threat in STR and no one has really built one yet?
I'm reading through this battle now...
This may open a can of worms, but this came up at the last autocross I was at. . . What are your thoughts on a 1.8 NA Miata running in STR? With these Toyos and the fact that the STS raw times don't seem to be too far off the STR raw times, could an NA 1.8 on the Toyos be a threat in STR and no one has really built one yet?
This may open a can of worms, but this came up at the last autocross I was at. . . What are your thoughts on a 1.8 NA Miata running in STR? With these Toyos and the fact that the STS raw times don't seem to be too far off the STR raw times, could an NA 1.8 on the Toyos be a threat in STR and no one has really built one yet?
Originally Posted by Vyndictive' timestamp='1340291669' post='21800054
I'm reading through this battle now...
This may open a can of worms, but this came up at the last autocross I was at. . . What are your thoughts on a 1.8 NA Miata running in STR? With these Toyos and the fact that the STS raw times don't seem to be too far off the STR raw times, could an NA 1.8 on the Toyos be a threat in STR and no one has really built one yet?
This may open a can of worms, but this came up at the last autocross I was at. . . What are your thoughts on a 1.8 NA Miata running in STR? With these Toyos and the fact that the STS raw times don't seem to be too far off the STR raw times, could an NA 1.8 on the Toyos be a threat in STR and no one has really built one yet?
Oh well, I'm glad STR doesn't really have a dog in the Toyo fight right now.
Originally Posted by sirbunz' timestamp='1340292189' post='21800088
[quote name='Vyndictive' timestamp='1340291669' post='21800054']
I'm reading through this battle now...
This may open a can of worms, but this came up at the last autocross I was at. . . What are your thoughts on a 1.8 NA Miata running in STR? With these Toyos and the fact that the STS raw times don't seem to be too far off the STR raw times, could an NA 1.8 on the Toyos be a threat in STR and no one has really built one yet?
I'm reading through this battle now...
This may open a can of worms, but this came up at the last autocross I was at. . . What are your thoughts on a 1.8 NA Miata running in STR? With these Toyos and the fact that the STS raw times don't seem to be too far off the STR raw times, could an NA 1.8 on the Toyos be a threat in STR and no one has really built one yet?
Oh well, I'm glad STR doesn't really have a dog in the Toyo fight right now.
[/quote]
Actually, STR is concerned with the 195 R1R. Desimo/Marcus run them with success on a mild/medium setup and John Brown is building a MRS for STR unless the Toyos are banned. With these really talented drivers coming to the class with the "lightweight" cars, I can see the tire argument becoming an issue in STR quickly. Better to ban them now rather than in the future when you have more NAs, NBs, and MRSs running then in large numbers. As you pointed out, nobody has built an 1.8 NA with a proper diff and campaigned it out to a NT yet. It has the potential to be a great STR car given the courses over the last year. STR was supposed to be for larger roadsters from the original proposals, but as the history of ST classes go, the smaller/lightweight cars eventually take over.
Just for fun, if you look at potential participation, the NB, NC, and S2k are all popular enough to have their own spec ST classes. Then there wouldn't be a course or car dependency outside of the model differences.
-Marc
-Marc
My comment wasn't aimed directly at you, Marc. It was aimed at your sentiment which is shared by the folks that are against this tire.
Here's the scoop. It's the same compound for all tires. It's just that the 195 is made with it through and through. The larger sizes are not. You can run any other size R1R down to about 4/32s and you'd be getting all the benefit of the 195 except for the benefit given from super short tread blocks.
The 255 and 245 R1R can be run on our cars with some success... just don't let them go past 4/32s.
Here's the scoop. It's the same compound for all tires. It's just that the 195 is made with it through and through. The larger sizes are not. You can run any other size R1R down to about 4/32s and you'd be getting all the benefit of the 195 except for the benefit given from super short tread blocks.
The 255 and 245 R1R can be run on our cars with some success... just don't let them go past 4/32s.
Originally Posted by daverx7' timestamp='1340283525' post='21799718
So, that means that you can go ahead and put 195 Toyo's on your STR car. I won't care. Oh wait... that's not really applicable for STR. 

My comment wasn't aimed directly at you, Marc. It was aimed at your sentiment which is shared by the folks that are against this tire.
Here's the scoop. It's the same compound for all tires. It's just that the 195 is made with it through and through. The larger sizes are not. You can run any other size R1R down to about 4/32s and you'd be getting all the benefit of the 195 except for the benefit given from super short tread blocks.
The 255 and 245 R1R can be run on our cars with some success... just don't let them go past 4/32s.
Here's the scoop. It's the same compound for all tires. It's just that the 195 is made with it through and through. The larger sizes are not. You can run any other size R1R down to about 4/32s and you'd be getting all the benefit of the 195 except for the benefit given from super short tread blocks.
The 255 and 245 R1R can be run on our cars with some success... just don't let them go past 4/32s.
-Marc
Originally Posted by glagola1' timestamp='1340307805' post='21800962
My comment wasn't aimed directly at you, Marc. It was aimed at your sentiment which is shared by the folks that are against this tire.
Here's the scoop. It's the same compound for all tires. It's just that the 195 is made with it through and through. The larger sizes are not. You can run any other size R1R down to about 4/32s and you'd be getting all the benefit of the 195 except for the benefit given from super short tread blocks.
The 255 and 245 R1R can be run on our cars with some success... just don't let them go past 4/32s.
Here's the scoop. It's the same compound for all tires. It's just that the 195 is made with it through and through. The larger sizes are not. You can run any other size R1R down to about 4/32s and you'd be getting all the benefit of the 195 except for the benefit given from super short tread blocks.
The 255 and 245 R1R can be run on our cars with some success... just don't let them go past 4/32s.
-Marc
-Colin















