S2000 Racing and Competition The S2000 on the track and Solo circuit. Some of the fastest S2000 drivers in the world call this forum home.

Shocks for STR

Thread Tools
 
Old Jun 27, 2010 | 04:58 AM
  #41  
keifla123's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 135
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by macr88,Jun 26 2010, 05:19 PM
What canisters?

This will be my second build once I get the valving of the PSS's to my liking.
Fox Racing. I have a valving that I am going to try but most builders I spoke with won't do what I want. They always tell me they have a valving that will work. Jamie at SRP was the best and most open to discussion about valving. He said he would build it how I wanted even if it took a little experimenting. He quoted me roughly $150 per corner for a revalve and extra to install the canisters that I will be supplying.
Reply
Old Jun 27, 2010 | 06:30 AM
  #42  
macr88's Avatar
Former Moderator
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 14,847
Likes: 10
From: Emmett
Default

Cool thank you, does it have high and low or just low?

Just curious, what was so different about what you wanted?
Reply
Old Jun 27, 2010 | 02:52 PM
  #43  
mLeach's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 635
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by keifla123,Jun 27 2010, 07:58 AM
Fox Racing. I have a valving that I am going to try but most builders I spoke with won't do what I want. They always tell me they have a valving that will work. Jamie at SRP was the best and most open to discussion about valving. He said he would build it how I wanted even if it took a little experimenting. He quoted me roughly $150 per corner for a revalve and extra to install the canisters that I will be supplying.
Where are you (or Nick) getting the Fox canisters?
Reply
Old Jun 27, 2010 | 03:03 PM
  #44  
keifla123's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 135
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by macr88,Jun 27 2010, 06:30 AM
Cool thank you, does it have high and low or just low?

Just curious, what was so different about what you wanted?
The Fox canisters have I believe 6 settings. As for shock valvings I have come to believe as have a few others that rebound is the devil and low speed compression is what you want. Most shock builders are not on the same page.
Reply
Old Jun 27, 2010 | 04:18 PM
  #45  
Random1's Avatar
Member (Premium)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,531
Likes: 3
From: Tucson
Default

I think rebound was the ticket for stock class to get more spring rate and better transition, but for a fully tuned suspension (STR with any springs, shocks, sway bars) you do not need the rebound to be so excessive as we all have been learning.
Reply
Old Jun 27, 2010 | 04:23 PM
  #46  
Random1's Avatar
Member (Premium)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,531
Likes: 3
From: Tucson
Default

Originally Posted by INTJ,Jun 27 2010, 02:18 PM
Random,

That is some insane rebound! I was looking at doing a Bilstein COB with the same ramp, but for compression, Tell me more about your set up.
I don't use all that rebound and currently running about 1/2 turn from full soft for the rear.

Just ask questions regarding my shock setup and I can answer them.
Reply
Old Jun 27, 2010 | 04:57 PM
  #47  
Aristoi's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 315
Likes: 0
From: Sparta NJ
Default

Originally Posted by Random1,Jun 25 2010, 03:41 PM


Nice shock rig. You should have built it with a 2.5" cylinder. That is what i did with mine and i can get 5 in/s on the stiffest rebound settings. I also beefed up to 2.5" square tubing all around. What correction factor are you using?
Reply
Old Jun 27, 2010 | 09:10 PM
  #48  
Random1's Avatar
Member (Premium)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,531
Likes: 3
From: Tucson
Default

Originally Posted by Aristoi,Jun 27 2010, 05:57 PM
Nice shock rig. You should have built it with a 2.5" cylinder. That is what i did with mine and i can get 5 in/s on the stiffest rebound settings. I also beefed up to 2.5" square tubing all around. What correction factor are you using?
Thanks. I just cut off the plot at 5 in/sec to focus on the low speed handling. Most plots have data point up to 10 -12 in/sec.

The factor... It is the area of the piston minus the area of the shaft for the rebound side, 2.94 vs 3.1 for the compression side. Or are you talking about the bias in force due to the nitrogen pressure?

I will consider a larger diameter cylinder. Thanks.
Reply
Old Jun 27, 2010 | 10:15 PM
  #49  
macr88's Avatar
Former Moderator
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 14,847
Likes: 10
From: Emmett
Default

Originally Posted by keifla123,Jun 27 2010, 04:03 PM
The Fox canisters have I believe 6 settings. As for shock valvings I have come to believe as have a few others that rebound is the devil and low speed compression is what you want. Most shock builders are not on the same page.
I agree that it can be the devil but if used correctly it can be very useful.

My old shocks with 900lb springs had 757lbs of rebound 10"' a sexond at full soft.
My current setup has 672lb springs and 282lbs of rebound force at 10" a second.

I think today's Auto X confirmed the the direction with the shocks is correct.
Reply
Old Jun 28, 2010 | 04:36 AM
  #50  
keifla123's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 135
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by macr88,Jun 27 2010, 10:15 PM
I agree that it can be the devil but if used correctly it can be very useful.

My old shocks with 900lb springs had 757lbs of rebound 10"' a sexond at full soft.
My current setup has 672lb springs and 282lbs of rebound force at 10" a second.

I think today's Auto X confirmed the the direction with the shocks is correct.
I think that 282lbs of rebound at 10" a second is perfectly fine. I think anything under 400 at 10-12" per second is ok.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:50 AM.