This is a broad generalization, and consequently, inaccurate. It depends on the track. Case in point, an S2000 on VIR's Full Course can be gobbled up by a lesser handling car that has more hp. Take those same two cars and put them on VIR's North Course, and the TTC S2000 probably runs better than most TTB's.

 

Well, I guess that ends that debate. Thanks, mxt.

 

Personally, I'd still throw some RA-1's(shaved, of course) on your car and give it a go. You might have some/lots of fun.

 

When i was @ nationals. I was talking to Greg Greenbaum about the exhuast question. and he said if you have a header back system its +2 for that and +1 for cat delete.

header +2

 

thats how i ran my car @ nationals,

KWV3s Shaved RA-1s 235/255 and comptech fsb. Hondata ecu reflash, stock header and custom 3in exhuast. and i have had a blast running my car this year, but do to the fact that its also my DD, its been really expensive.

 

And that explanation makes zero sense to me. Header-back exhaust insinuates a cat delete. How many header-back exhausts do you know of that incorporate an oem cat? Zero. If they did, then it would simply be a cat-back exhaust.


Either way, I have to use a stock exhaust for weight purposes.

 

For him, I was suggesting, literally, only changing the tires. The whole point of the CR is to be closer to track prepped. R-comps, pads/fluid, and weight reduction to the minimum limit is what I'd try first.

Did you see my post on the NASA forum about points and differentiating between AP1/2?

 

no i did not, i haven't been on there to much lately.

for the ap2 if there not as close to the weight limit then there at a disadvantage i think. My car sat right at 2860 with the stock passenger seat in. but since i got the hard top i removed the soft top all together.

 

stock front lip count any point?

 

Yup.