1999 auto c5
10-10-2010, 06:22 AM
#14
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 2,327
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by josh7owens,Oct 8 2010, 06:58 AM
My s2k has
-t1r 70mm
KN FIPK intake
with out the header, HFC and pullies I put down 209/141 to the wheels.
-t1r 70mm
KN FIPK intake
with out the header, HFC and pullies I put down 209/141 to the wheels.
10-10-2010, 08:40 AM
#15
Registered User
Originally Posted by CLEANs2000,Oct 10 2010, 06:22 AM
so let me get this straight... with just an intake and catback you put down 209 to the wheels on your earlier model ap1.... doesnt sound right at all... earlier model ap1's dyno around + - 190 stock... you didnt gain almost 20 whp from an intake and catback
10-10-2010, 10:20 AM
#16
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Frankfort, KY
Posts: 4,340
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by CLEANs2000,Oct 10 2010, 09:22 AM
so let me get this straight... with just an intake and catback you put down 209 to the wheels on your earlier model ap1.... doesnt sound right at all... earlier model ap1's dyno around + - 190 stock... you didnt gain almost 20 whp from an intake and catback
Only mods were t1r 70mm single and aem v2 intake
10-10-2010, 11:45 AM
#18
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,393
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by ian02s2k,Oct 9 2010, 12:04 PM
Not exactly. C4's were kinda slow for Corvette standards, unless your buddy's is the ZR1. Here are the specs straight from corvetteguys.com
5.7L V-8 LT1300 HP @ 5000 RPM
330lb-ft @ 4000 RPM 0-60 5.1 sec 15.1 sec @ 95mph
5.7L V-8 LT5405 HP@5800 RPM
385lb-ft@5600 0-60 4.9sec 13.4sec
5.7L V-8 LT1300 HP @ 5000 RPM
330lb-ft @ 4000 RPM 0-60 5.1 sec 15.1 sec @ 95mph
5.7L V-8 LT5405 HP@5800 RPM
385lb-ft@5600 0-60 4.9sec 13.4sec
10-10-2010, 11:59 AM
#19
Registered User
Originally Posted by brockLT1,Oct 10 2010, 01:45 PM
your LT1 info is wrong. It should be high 13's at 100+mpg....not 15.1. 15.1 would be the POS TPI motor from the early early 90's, late 80's when nothing was fast. 96 manual vettes run almost stock to stock with LS1's as they have Lt4's.
10-10-2010, 12:07 PM
#20
Registered User
Originally Posted by xredjar,Oct 8 2010, 06:10 PM
Those were some quick calculations based on numbers given in the OP's first post, and from 1999 C5 Vette specs I could quickly find online.
If I'm wrong, enlighten me, but put some numbers up to show what I got wrong.
However, if you think a S2000 with bolt-ons is going to walk away from a vette in a straight line.....not going to happen.
The S2000 is a great car, and I love mine.....but there are faster cars out there.
If I'm wrong, enlighten me, but put some numbers up to show what I got wrong.
However, if you think a S2000 with bolt-ons is going to walk away from a vette in a straight line.....not going to happen.
The S2000 is a great car, and I love mine.....but there are faster cars out there.
The 99 would probably beat an s unless the driver of the vette sucked more than vanessa del rio.
The closest race I've had yet was with a c5z06, intake exhaust tune, weighed in at 3100 lbs at the track w driver, I barely beat him. so yea, the newer ls1s are fast, and good condition, maintained lt1s can be fast, but chances are if someone drives a 95 vette, they are spending most of their time looking for meth, not maintaining their car.