E55....
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 20,840
Likes: 0
From: Come see me after class.
If you don't care what I think, why the dozens of pages of pointless bickering between you and me?
Once again, I never said there was a such thing as a hydraulic engineer. You must've not seen my last few posts - or maybe you're just too dumb to understand?
The only reason I kept mentioning that you were a "hydraulic engineer" was to make fun of you. I don't know how much more simple I can make it. But let me try to break it down for you: The reason I would use it to make fun of you is because there is no such thing as a hydraulic engineer. Thus, it would be assumed that I knew there was no such thing, if I was using it as grounds for making fun of you. It's simple deductive reasoning. They teach you that in 6th grade.
Once again, I never said there was a such thing as a hydraulic engineer. You must've not seen my last few posts - or maybe you're just too dumb to understand?
The only reason I kept mentioning that you were a "hydraulic engineer" was to make fun of you. I don't know how much more simple I can make it. But let me try to break it down for you: The reason I would use it to make fun of you is because there is no such thing as a hydraulic engineer. Thus, it would be assumed that I knew there was no such thing, if I was using it as grounds for making fun of you. It's simple deductive reasoning. They teach you that in 6th grade.
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 20,840
Likes: 0
From: Come see me after class.
Originally posted by Big Ben
and the mistakes in his knowledge and logic of mechanics (as in physics mechanics, not under the hood mechanics).
and the mistakes in his knowledge and logic of mechanics (as in physics mechanics, not under the hood mechanics).
Because you know nothing of the latter. And that was my point the whole time, in the ITB thread. Your beloved theories and principles only apply in a closed system, devoid of outside forces such as heat, friction, gravity, material impurities, etc. My point was that with an engine, the rules do NOT apply in full. There are so many factors involved that you can't possibly say with certainty that this will happen, or that will happen, simply because physics say it will - or should.
Registered User
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 359
Likes: 0
From: Atlanta
[size=1]Originally posted by alexf20c [/sizeBTW, PHUNBALL, you don't have to believe if my dad has an E55 if you don't want to. If you don't, then don't, but quit bitching and whining. You've made your point, now be done with it. S2ki does have an ignore list. But, I guess because I posted those fraudulent pics, everything I say and do is also a lie. For example, when I say engines are capable of greater than 100% volumetric efficiency, it's a damn lie. It's impossible; in fact, volumetric efficiency is just some fancy terminology that engineers formulated to make themselves sound smart! It's all a hoax! Big Ben will tell you otherwise, because he's God's gift to engineering (after all, he IS a hydraulic engineer) and is never wrong.