m3 vs s2000
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 11,993
Likes: 1
From: formerly versionJDM
Originally Posted by jyeung528,Feb 28 2008, 12:53 PM
performance is slightly better, i agree.
but the downgrade aspect is not in performance, but rather the antiquity of the parts and style (appearance).
but the downgrade aspect is not in performance, but rather the antiquity of the parts and style (appearance).
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 11,993
Likes: 1
From: formerly versionJDM
Originally Posted by dewnie,Feb 28 2008, 12:40 PM
Really? 
I remember seeing turbo and supercharging kits running $9000 or so. Any Cat-Back exhaust was like $1800.
I remember seeing turbo and supercharging kits running $9000 or so. Any Cat-Back exhaust was like $1800.im a budget baller...............cause my wife said so.
Registered User
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,536
Likes: 0
From: Orlando
Originally Posted by versionJDM,Feb 28 2008, 09:52 AM
E36 ///M3
240hp/236ftlbs
0-60 5.5sec
0-1320 13.8@101
leather sport seats(heated)
heated mirrors
on board computer with diag check/trip computer/security code start/programable speed limiter ect....
power sunroof
dual zone climate control
side and front air-bags
rain sensing wipers(programable)
50/50 balance
i/h/e/chip 240whp/250wtq
i/h/e/chip/cams 265whp/270wtq
3000lbs
no that bad of a downgrade IMHO.
You better sign up for the BMW drive for breast cancer in your area man. You'll get to stomp the M3 and V12 7series if you please!!
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,664
Likes: 0
From: No va
e36 FTW! The only real problems i've had had nothing to do with performance but just maintenance. I had one brake caliper drag, changed a few oxygen sensors other than its beeen pretty sound. i/tp/e was thinking about the chip but ill probably go turbo. I thought my carbon fiber intake was expensive at 350 for a short ram.
