Me vs 07 CLS 63 AMG
05-04-2007, 04:09 AM
#11
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: New York
Posts: 2,271
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by JrodsS2000,May 4 2007, 02:04 AM
if hes buddy puts the tranny in manual mode and hits the paddle shifters i find it hard to believe. from the boosted S2Ks i have driven have all seem to still have nothing on the bottom end.
CLS 63= 507hp/456trq@4200lbs.
So that's roughly 430rwhp/387rwtq using 15% drivetrain loss.
His S2K = 451rwhp/316rwtq@2800lbs.
You really think this S would have problems spanking the CLS 63? Especially from a roll??
Poor Benz. I'm assuming it's not a keeper.
05-04-2007, 04:24 AM
#13
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Smithtown, NY
Posts: 1,394
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I have a customer with a CLS 63, he smokes his buddies 06 Gallardo which is actually surprisingly slow. He also smokes another customer's M6 which is faster then the lambo and pretty much everything else short of the CLS 63, and an X50 porsche turbo. The M6 does pull EVERYTHING over 110-120mph however, including the CLS. But for some reason from a dig that CLS is a beast up till about there. I would say that S2000 is in some pretty damn fast company. 
05-04-2007, 05:24 AM
#14
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by MINES13,May 4 2007, 04:24 AM
The M6 does pull EVERYTHING over 110-120mph however, including the CLS.
Dodge Viper
C6Z06
Ford GT
And thats just the American ones...
05-04-2007, 05:50 AM
#15
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Smithtown, NY
Posts: 1,394
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Roastem,May 4 2007, 05:24 AM
Umm...three big pink elephants in the room
Dodge Viper
C6Z06
Ford GT
And thats just the American ones...
Dodge Viper
C6Z06
Ford GT
And thats just the American ones...
05-04-2007, 06:26 AM
#16
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 110
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by MINES13,May 4 2007, 05:50 AM
I can only confirm cars he has raced, and everything he has ran he has beaten. Obviously I didn't mean that its faster then absolutely every 4 wheeled vehicle on Earth. I was implying that while the CLS63 is faster then many "supercars" it aparently can't hang with some well modified S2000s. Thanks for the trollin.
And the s2000 has been tuned while the cls63 is stock.
05-04-2007, 08:21 AM
#17
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: So. Cali 626
Posts: 2,238
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by nevert00fast,May 4 2007, 04:09 AM
Let's see,
CLS 63= 507hp/456trq@4200lbs.
So that's roughly 430rwhp/387rwtq using 15% drivetrain loss.
His S2K = 451rwhp/316rwtq@2800lbs.
You really think this S would have problems spanking the CLS 63? Especially from a roll??
CLS 63= 507hp/456trq@4200lbs.
So that's roughly 430rwhp/387rwtq using 15% drivetrain loss.
His S2K = 451rwhp/316rwtq@2800lbs.
You really think this S would have problems spanking the CLS 63? Especially from a roll??
Automatic = POS and robbed alot of power.
Second a turbo s2k will spank the living shit out all AMG unless its a SL65 chipped. German vehicle are heavy ass pigs. Remember folks WEIGHT IS YOUR ENEMY WHEN GOING FAST!
05-04-2007, 09:02 AM
#18
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: So. Cali 626
Posts: 2,238
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Here a video of a CLS63 AMG putting down 414rwhp/410lbs.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SxHEHiM09aY
here a video of E63 AMG putting down 424rwhp but no graph =P.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FJnz2PZwIiE
Here a video of a M5 v10 on 500 mode.
Click here to see Video
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SxHEHiM09aY
here a video of E63 AMG putting down 424rwhp but no graph =P.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FJnz2PZwIiE
Here a video of a M5 v10 on 500 mode.
Click here to see Video
05-04-2007, 09:19 AM
#19
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: New York
Posts: 2,271
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Birdie,May 4 2007, 11:21 AM
Nope a CLS63 doesn't put those numbers down! The drivetrain lost is much more due to their torque converter design, I assuming. Go on youtube and you can see that the 63 AMG and M5 are putting down roughly 404-410rwhp.
Automatic = POS and robbed alot of power.
Second a turbo s2k will spank the living shit out all AMG unless its a SL65 chipped. German vehicle are heavy ass pigs. Remember folks WEIGHT IS YOUR ENEMY WHEN GOING FAST!
Automatic = POS and robbed alot of power.
Second a turbo s2k will spank the living shit out all AMG unless its a SL65 chipped. German vehicle are heavy ass pigs. Remember folks WEIGHT IS YOUR ENEMY WHEN GOING FAST!
05-04-2007, 09:27 AM
#20
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: So. Cali 626
Posts: 2,238
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
^ i know you are =), stop being such a nice guys to those german car. ahhahaha.
check out those videos. the M5 sound real nice on the dyno though, even though they are slow =P.
check out those videos. the M5 sound real nice on the dyno though, even though they are slow =P.