my01 vs. m3
01-18-2007, 05:59 PM
#12
Originally Posted by s2kjb,Jan 18 2007, 08:38 AM
i have
almost completely built head (just looking for some decent aftermarket cams)
almost completely built head (just looking for some decent aftermarket cams)
Also, why would u have any headwork done if ur NA?
01-19-2007, 04:34 AM
#14
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 2,717
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by bigpurp,Jan 18 2007, 06:59 PM
What does that mean?
Also, why would u have any headwork done if ur NA?
Also, why would u have any headwork done if ur NA?
01-19-2007, 11:30 AM
#15
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Orange Park
Posts: 4,127
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I wouldn't think your head work would add any appreciable performance value with the mods you have. At those speeds the M3 should have pulled away from you with little or no trouble. Anything can happen on the streets but he could have had some driver error and should have still won.
01-19-2007, 01:55 PM
#16
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 2,717
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
^ i know this, i also know that i should have lost. thats why im sure of it being driver error. i did the pnp for mods that are coming and figured why not since i had the head off.
01-22-2007, 10:02 PM
#17
Registered User
the good M3's are 95 (ODB1 3.0) (99 ODB2 3.2) and the E46 all the same. The E46 smashes on the older ones my buddy had a IDB1 E36, my S even without turbo would eat it.
01-24-2007, 03:21 AM
#18
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Sweden
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You are spoiled with slow BMWs. =)
In europe, the E36 has 286bhp 93-95 and 321bhp 96->
Both the 321bhp E36 and the E46 should be much faster than a s2000 that has no turbo/supercharger.
In europe, the E36 has 286bhp 93-95 and 321bhp 96->
Both the 321bhp E36 and the E46 should be much faster than a s2000 that has no turbo/supercharger.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post