S/C s2k vs. turbo 300zx
#12
Originally Posted by Spartikus,Feb 1 2007, 06:52 PM
You said with "a lot less" hp.
#14
I think what you're talking about is the Supras inability to gain traction. I heard it's mostly a suspension design problem. It was designed for the turns, and the 1300hp Supras are pushing it to do something it wasn't built for.
#15
Originally Posted by Spartikus,Feb 1 2007, 07:01 PM
I think what you're talking about is the Supras inability to gain traction. I heard it's mostly a suspension design problem. It was designed for the turns, and the 1300hp Supras are pushing it to do something it wasn't built for.
#16
Originally Posted by N/Apower,Feb 1 2007, 07:05 PM
I think the fact that the Lingenfelther has more than double the rwhp than the Supra for a good several thousand RPM says a lot...Also look at tq. Check out some supra ET's with given rwhp and then check out some F-body or mustang ET's with the same hp.
F-body's and Mustangs don't have to deal with an IRS. Maybe that's why they hook better for better e.t.'s? I believe that's what I said above. It's not due to a "superior" powerband that they are faster, but because their suspensions were designed with straight lines more in mind.
#17
Originally Posted by Spartikus,Feb 1 2007, 07:11 PM
You mean it has power where the Supra wouldn't be racing anyway? That doesn't make sense. Yeah, a Civic probably makes more power than my S2k before 6k, but that doesn't matter as I'm ripping past them.
F-body's and Mustangs don't have to deal with an IRS. Maybe that's why they hook better for better e.t.'s?
F-body's and Mustangs don't have to deal with an IRS. Maybe that's why they hook better for better e.t.'s?
PS> Cobra and Vette, in reguards to your IRS.
#18
Originally Posted by N/Apower,Feb 1 2007, 07:16 PM
Take a look at the charts...if both cars lose about 1200rpm on the shift, the Vette will be making VERY CLOSE TO THE SAME! rwhp as the Supra at the beginning of each new gear...now think of where the vette would be if it had the SAME! peak hp as the Supra...a good 300whp ahead of it.
#19
Originally Posted by Spartikus,Feb 1 2007, 07:20 PM
Are you looking at the same dyno charts I am? Subtract 1200rpms from where the Supra ended the dyno and you're still well above 1250hp.
Now think about it. If the VETTE had 1300whp peak, just like the Supra, it would be well ahead of it after that 1200rpm drop instead of within 100whp of it. I mean, it started with a 400whp loss and after the shift is only down 100ish whp.