S2000 vs. Evo
Originally posted by BBY2KS2K
Are you talking 0-60, 1/4 mile, road course times? With the right driver, a stock S should give an Evo a good run for it's money.
Are you talking 0-60, 1/4 mile, road course times? With the right driver, a stock S should give an Evo a good run for it's money.
i have raced them 1/4 mile and top speed the only thing is that you really need to drive the S2000 very well and especially launching the car.
I've only ran a few evo/sti's, as posted, in my NSX and I haven't had a problem with any of them. I've only ran a couple of S's, very casually, no idea who the driver was, down a local highway and they hung about the same as the EVOs did, so I would say its a drivers race from a roll. From a dig, hasta la bye bye S2k...you'll catch up around 80 or so I would think because of the long gears on the S2k. Thats what helped me so much was the fact that the EVO shifted 4 times in the 1/4 mile and I only shifted 3...and my gear box (and the S2k gear box) is much tighter and more responsive than the EVOs.
Originally posted by NemesisS2k
S2000 all motor modieifed could eat the EVO (stock). S2000 motor is very capable of going faster.
S2000 all motor modieifed could eat the EVO (stock). S2000 motor is very capable of going faster.
Give us about 1 month to finally get some parts for the EVO and we'll make a video. We plan on a turbo back exhaust (40-50 whp), reprogrammed ECU (20-25 whp) intake (10-15 whp) and maybe cams (25-30 whp) all for about $2000. If we get some decent weather, we might get a run with the S w/exhaust and drop in filter -vs- Stock EVO.






