S2000 Street Encounters Stories of on-the-road exploits and encounters.

S2k vs(?) 993 Porsche Carrera S

Thread Tools
 
Old 02-07-2005, 05:25 PM
  #11  
Registered User
 
steve c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 6,792
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Most 993 Carrera 2's run 13.2-13.5@103-104mph.
In fantasyland maybe. Most are low 14 / high 13 second cars, a few -- and I mean a very very few break into the mid 13's.

The convertible which weighs more is not going to run 13.5's stock ... ever.
Old 02-07-2005, 05:37 PM
  #12  
Registered User
 
Purple_sky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Purple sky
Posts: 2,899
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Fishey' date='Feb 7 2005, 11:03 AM
Also, Most 993 Carrera 2's run 13.2-13.5@103-104mph. I had timeslip of my slower 95 cabriolet 993 running a 13.5@104 (1.91 60ft) but I cannot find it.
How could a 993, which only had ~270 hp, be almost as fast as a 996 (with ~320 hp)? 996's were low to mid 13-sec cars. The 993 was as fast as the old 270-hp NSX, which was basically high 13-sec car with traps of around 103.

Yes, both the 993 and old NSX would be faster than an S2000, but not by that much, and if not driven properly, they could lose. 993 was not as fast as you claimed.
Old 02-07-2005, 05:41 PM
  #13  
Registered User
 
Purple_sky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Purple sky
Posts: 2,899
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by steve c' date='Feb 7 2005, 06:25 PM
In fantasyland maybe. Most are low 14 / high 13 second cars, a few -- and I mean a very very few break into the mid 13's.

The convertible which weighs more is not going to run 13.5's stock ... ever.
Hey, a Porsche owner concurs what I said.
Old 02-07-2005, 07:59 PM
  #14  
Registered User
 
Fishey's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Lebanon
Posts: 295
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by steve c' date='Feb 7 2005, 06:25 PM
In fantasyland maybe. Most are low 14 / high 13 second cars, a few -- and I mean a very very few break into the mid 13's.

The convertible which weighs more is not going to run 13.5's stock ... ever.
http://forums.rennlist.com/rennforums/show...ight=1%2F4+mile

That was a magazine reviewed times. You can also take a minute and look around more on the 993 section of rennlist.com and find that its not impossible and is actually very common.
Old 02-07-2005, 08:38 PM
  #15  
Registered User
 
adsc4s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Purple_sky' date='Feb 7 2005, 06:37 PM
How could a 993, which only had ~270 hp, be almost as fast as a 996 (with ~320 hp)? 996's were low to mid 13-sec cars.
The 996 was actually lighter than the 993 and had more HP and torque. It probably boiled down to gearing, I would imagine.

In a street race with a rolling start, a 993 and a S2000 would be close if both were in the right gear.
Old 02-08-2005, 07:03 AM
  #16  
Registered User
 
steve c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 6,792
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

I'm a member of rennlist. That does not change the above statement that most are low 14/high 13 second cars and that your heavier convertible did not and will not run a 13.5.
Old 02-08-2005, 09:46 AM
  #17  
Registered User
 
Fishey's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Lebanon
Posts: 295
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Do you even know the weight diffrence between cab and coupe? Hell do you even know the diffrence between eurospec gearing and american?
Old 02-08-2005, 01:17 PM
  #18  
Registered User
 
Purple_sky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Purple sky
Posts: 2,899
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Here's a very fair comparison. NSX and 911 (non-turbo) have always had similar accelerations. When they had 270 hp, they both were high 13/low 14-second cars with similar trap speeds, and when they were 290-320 hp, they were both low 13-sec cars with similar trap speeds.

The 997 of course will be faster, but the NSX is being killed off soon. Maybe Honda will replace it, or maybe not. If the new one will come out again, I'd believe they once again will have similar accelerations, unless Honda went wild with it and gave it massive hp like 450+.
Old 02-08-2005, 02:01 PM
  #19  
Registered User
 
Fishey's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Lebanon
Posts: 295
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

So are you telling me a 3.4l 996 is faster then a 993? or are you talking purely about the 3.6l?
Old 02-08-2005, 06:12 PM
  #20  
Registered User
 
COSMOSIS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Tropical hell, MIA
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

What I want to know is how another 35 hp in the 997 is dropping their 1/4 mile times by almost a whole second and raising the traps almost 10mph. Anybody read Road & Track this month, see that and say "WTF?"

Yeah, the 993 isn't quite as fast as a 996 (but it'smy favorite 911). I know, I've lost to both


Quick Reply: S2k vs(?) 993 Porsche Carrera S



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:22 PM.