S2000 Street Encounters Stories of on-the-road exploits and encounters.

WRX for dinner...

Thread Tools
 
Old Aug 13, 2001 | 09:03 AM
  #21  
Clark's Avatar
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 1,045
Likes: 1
From: Chicago
Default

[QUOTE]Originally posted by S2kRob
[B]I honestly don't think he knows how to launch.

I've seen an EVO 7 from a standing start eat an NSX and an RX-7 - badly.

WRX + a $5-$6k turbo package will have that car doing 0-60 in mid to low 4's and 1/4 mile in mid 12 second range.
Reply
Old Aug 13, 2001 | 12:45 PM
  #22  
mstw's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 1,290
Likes: 0
Default

I think its true that the tranny on WRX is not as strong as it should be ....... a friend of mine has one and surfs on the WRX board like our wonderful s2ki.com, his comment on the WRX tranny is ............ its a "glass box"
Reply
Old Aug 13, 2001 | 01:05 PM
  #23  
integrate's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 8,079
Likes: 0
From: Irvine
Default

Originally posted by Clark
F20C,

Actually the fact that it's awd really hurts the WRX on a launch. Since the WRX really needs to spool up th turbo a bit, it would be useful if it could get a little wheelspin, much like doing a 7k clutch drop in the S2k. Unfortunately there is absolutely no way the subie is going to get any wheelspin, so every launch is pretty much going to be like an off-idle launch for them.

My friend has an Audi S4 and he's found that he gets better 1/4 mile times on wet pavement bacause he can dump the clutch and actually get a little bit of wheelspin before all 4 tires hook-up.
So what happens if you drop the clutch let's say at 4 grand in the WRX?

Also about the S4 launching, I hear it's kind hard also to drop the clutch.
Reply
Old Aug 13, 2001 | 01:33 PM
  #24  
S2kRob's Avatar
25 Year Member
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 7,414
Likes: 0
From: Toronto
Default

Originally posted by fluxen


In that car, you'd only be making about 275 hp with 270ft/lbs. I don't think it's quite enough. 350 would be nice, but the tranny won't hold the 340ft/lbs that would accompany it.
Quick calculation: 270lb/ft of torque at 6500rpm = 335 hp. 270lb/ft of torque at 7000rpm (WRX redline) = 360hp.

So, 270lb/ft of torque is more than enough to make huge horsepower, you just have to make that torque in the right place.
Reply
Old Aug 13, 2001 | 02:23 PM
  #25  
ragtop's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 99
Likes: 0
From: Fort Collins
Default

integrate.

When I drop the clutch at 4K on my WRX, i get a little bit of rear wheel chirp, and then all the tires grip and I bog down. The Rex is very easy to launch. Just rev to about 4K, and slip the cluth a little. Then once the car starts to move, you let out the rest of the clutch in a quick motion. It really snaps your head back. Definitely easier to launch than the S2K. Not sure how much torque you get in 1st gear, since the stock WRX is limited to 10psi in 1st, but it seems to be alot.

With the S2000, either you spin the wheels like crazy or you bog down. There's no in-between.

Watch out for the WRX's with a manual boost controller (or any boost controller). With a simple $50 mod you can ensure full boost (14psi) in 1st gear, making it much quicker off the line. Also the MBC tends to flatten out the curve at high RPMs, as the ECU will try and drop the boost to about 9psi near redline. WRX's equipped with nothing more than a boost controller are significantly quicker than a stock one.

(edit)

The general consensus on the WRX 5-speed transmission is that it's good to about 280lb-ft or so. This should be enough for about 300HP. The auto trannie is reportedly much better, but then it's an auto . The only available option WRX owners can turn to is an STi supplied 6-speed that costs $8000. Ouch!
Reply
Old Aug 13, 2001 | 02:39 PM
  #26  
integrate's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 8,079
Likes: 0
From: Irvine
Default

[QUOTE]Originally posted by ragtop
[B]integrate.

When I drop the clutch at 4K on my WRX, i get a little bit of rear wheel chirp, and then all the tires grip and I bog down.
Reply
Old Aug 13, 2001 | 02:50 PM
  #27  
fluxen's Avatar
Registered User
Gold Member (Premium)
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,046
Likes: 0
From: Anaheim
Default

[QUOTE]Originally posted by S2kRob
[B]

Quick calculation:
Reply
Old Aug 13, 2001 | 04:15 PM
  #28  
S2kRob's Avatar
25 Year Member
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 7,414
Likes: 0
From: Toronto
Default

Originally posted by fluxen


But you're talking about some major changes to fundamentally change the whole charecter of the engine. Before I'd do that just to save a weak tranny, I'd change the tranny, keep my torque down low, and increase boost.
From what I've seen, a stock WRX makes peak power at around 5500rpm, so there are two options:

1) You move the peak torque upwards.
2) You create a broad plateau of near max torque over a several thousand rpm range.

Seeing as you own an RX7, I don't need to tell you what bolting on a bigger turbo can do to the engine characteristics. They typically move the peak torque up the rev range.

Also, changing the tranny is actually more expensive than changing the engine characteristics. A base upgrade to stronger synchro compatible gears runs over $3k. From there, you can go to a dogbox. Beyond that, the only other option is the new STi 6 speed box, which retails for about $8k, but can probably take about 300ft/lb or more of torque reliably - no one really knows yet.
Reply
Old Aug 14, 2001 | 09:50 AM
  #29  
fluxen's Avatar
Registered User
Gold Member (Premium)
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,046
Likes: 0
From: Anaheim
Default

You're right, a bigger turbo will do it.
Reply
Old Aug 14, 2001 | 10:19 AM
  #30  
jjanicke's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 205
Likes: 0
From: San Francisco
Default

You guys are missing the most critical point. Like our stooks the S4 and the WRX don't come to life until you toss them into the turns on a track.

Then all I can say is hang on, especially when it
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:35 AM.