Don't fret over it, get both.

 

[QUOTE]Originally posted by Big Al
[B]Don't fret over it, get both.

 

[QUOTE]Originally posted by Big Al
[B]Don't fret over it, get both.

 

Without getting too much off topic, my 2000 is a rare coupe - not a targa...

The S2000 relevance... It was because of my '00 S2000 that I decided that I could not stand the '98 NSX-T back because it had more chassis flex and steering shake at almost 3 times the price (though I had a good lease deal $500/month) of an S2000.

 

Actually, the timing belt on the NSX is 90k miles, that's what is in he manual and as for the replacement of the TB with water pump its about $1000-$1100 from Acura

check it out:

http://www.nsxsc.com/cgi-bin/Ultimate.cgi?action=intro

http://www.nsxprime.com/cgi-bin/ubb/Ultimate.cgi

 

it's kinda strange that u post this question on a s2k board, because most ppl will be biased on the s2k. it's the fact that they picked the s2k for a reason, and those are the reason's they'll give. it's all on preferance, and if your on this board, your preferance should be swayed towards a s2k.

 

But then, there will be those who have experience with both cars...

 

i know that. i'm just saying that some ppl have debated this, and drove both cars, and at the end they picked the s2k. so if he's gonna ask the opinion of getting a s2k or nsx, it's gonna be the s2k. btws, i think it's really just preference, know what your buying, and it's all good.

 

pre '96 NSXs do high 13s

 

<< Speed wise a S2000 will beat a 92 NSX >>

That is BullSh*t.

This topic has been addressed here a few times before. If you're interested in what I and other NSX/S2000 owners have said about this, do a little search...