S2000 Talk Discussions related to the S2000, its ownership and enthusiasm for it.

2.2L Engine swap

Thread Tools
 
Old Mar 10, 2007 | 07:54 AM
  #321  
GrandMasterKhan's Avatar
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,149
Likes: 17
From: Raleigh, NC
Default

I certainly feel the AP2 NEEDs a higher redline. It simply slams into the redlimiter @ 8200. Especially for mountain driving an extra 400 rpms could make all the difference.

8600 rpms for the ap2 would be perfect, and I am sure with ap1 cams the Ap2 2.2 would make power all the way to 9k.
Reply
Old Mar 10, 2007 | 07:57 AM
  #322  
Willie Gee's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 13,826
Likes: 0
From: New Slowmyrna Beach
Default

Thank you sam. I didn't realize Deathsled purchased your car. I remember you were one of the first people in Florida to do this mod. I have an AP1 ECU collecting dust, but the thought of a MASE'D AEM in my car makes me think twice about the swap.
Reply
Old Mar 13, 2007 | 03:40 PM
  #323  
Intrepid175's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 2,189
Likes: 0
From: Texas City
Default

Originally Posted by Scot' date='Mar 7 2007, 02:35 PM
not strange really..... max power on a stock AP1 is at 8300rpm per honda.

after that it drops off...just like any other car....
Exactly, but it's still got 700 rpm's to redline and then a little buffer above that before the rev limiter kicks in. The stock AP2's make max power at 7800 rpms with an 8000 redline and a couple of hundred above that before the rev limiter kicks in. There's simply not as much time to feel any power drop off on the AP2 cars.

Also, I think Honda has gotten a better idea of how well these engines are going to hold up in the real world so they're being a little more aggressive with the fuel mapping and ignition curves on the AP2's than they were with the AP1's. If I remember correctly, the early year model AP1's richened up a bit after peak power rpms (8300) and that's one reason they had the power drop off that they did. New AP1's (2002-2003) do better in that regard and the AP2's are better still except they don't rev as high overall.
Reply
Old Mar 13, 2007 | 04:22 PM
  #324  
dyhppy's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 5,749
Likes: 1
From: Santa Monica-SoCal
Default

do u miss the power that the ap2 ecu gives u over the older ap1 chip?
Reply
Old Mar 13, 2007 | 08:43 PM
  #325  
GrandMasterKhan's Avatar
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,149
Likes: 17
From: Raleigh, NC
Default

What about an F22 with AP1 cams to 9k? Does the power still drop off??
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2007 | 06:29 PM
  #326  
dyhppy's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 5,749
Likes: 1
From: Santa Monica-SoCal
Default

thinking of doing this tmrw. really hope i dont blow up the engine.
Reply
Old Mar 16, 2007 | 01:59 AM
  #327  
dyhppy's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 5,749
Likes: 1
From: Santa Monica-SoCal
Default

started a new thread, but also wanted to update this one

impressions are that the engine feels leaner, needs to be pushed harder to go, but also feels more flexible. extra rpms give great sound and feel while keeping u in vtec. loss of torque noticeable at low revs.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
SubeSTile
Arizona S2000 Owners
0
Apr 1, 2013 06:19 PM
FormerH22a4
S2000 Talk
10
Aug 17, 2003 05:07 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:39 AM.