S2000 Talk Discussions related to the S2000, its ownership and enthusiasm for it.

2004 s2000 vs. 2003

Thread Tools
 
Old Mar 12, 2004 | 07:21 AM
  #21  
s2k paradigm's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 489
Likes: 0
From: Tysons Corner
Default

do some research...www.edmunds.com it moght be the littlest thing that makes you buy one MY compared to the other ....you never know
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2004 | 07:39 AM
  #22  
john hood's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 240
Likes: 0
From: katy
Default

How about we agree that they are both great cars! It reminds me of Corvette owners. An old 60's Vette with the max hp 427 is considered an awesome car...and it is, but it isn't as fast as a bone stock 2004 Vette. So which is "better"? They are both great for different reasons.
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2004 | 07:48 AM
  #23  
Chadwick's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,892
Likes: 0
From: Tiffin, Ohio
Default

Originally posted by koala
I'd just wait until 2006 when its a V10 with 1 million horsepower.


Reply
Old Mar 12, 2004 | 08:13 AM
  #24  
p0pe's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 5,022
Likes: 0
From: Lafayette, LA
Default

I'm really sick of these posts (Try searching!!!). First off most people are comparing stock s2000s to each other, saying the 04 suspension feels 'soft' compared to the pre 03 models. If you're not planning on modding the car, the 03 will oversteer more out of the box but will feel a little twitchier and raw. The 04 will have less oversteer, feel better as a daily driver, and be more stable at higher speeds.

I personally plan on modding the _sh1t_ out of mine so I really don't care. If you don't know much about suspension tuning and don't care then buy whichever model suits you best. The real difference is that the new model has more whp/torque at lower rpms (dyno proven) and a lower redline. And trust me, the 04 can be made to handle just as well as the 03.
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2004 | 08:55 AM
  #25  
MrClean's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 4,207
Likes: 1
From: Powell, OH
Default

I had the same decision at hand a couple months ago.

I went with the 04, mainly based on costmetics and ride.

I had the same concerns with the 9k rpm redline. Now that I am used to the 04, I really don't miss the extra 1k rpm. The 04 is strong.

To be 100% honest, the pre-04's did give you more time between shifts once in the VTEC. I am still getting a feel for when to shift and find myself having to watch the RPm gauge often to avoid over-reving the 04.
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2004 | 12:29 PM
  #26  
cornercompacts's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,275
Likes: 0
From: Brooklyn
Default

what i am mainly concerned about is not the handling/suspension soo much, seeing how i will be putting in aftermarket parts, but the fact that the gears are longer in the 03', thus it seemed like the 03' was quicker, if not quicker more fun to drive.

Question: if i were to get an 03' would the new aluminum interior pieces from the 04' fit right into the 03'?

Thanks in advance
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
SantaTom
S2000 Talk
30
Feb 14, 2009 02:35 PM
eyeofthetiger
UK & Ireland S2000 Community
11
Jan 28, 2004 10:00 AM
Vector
S2000 Talk
15
Oct 22, 2003 09:50 AM
airgate
Car and Bike Talk
7
Sep 6, 2003 05:45 AM
autox80
S2000 Racing and Competition
30
Aug 29, 2003 02:24 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:01 AM.