Is average RPM driving not good?
Originally Posted by RED MX5,Apr 27 2008, 12:37 PM
Since most wear takes place during dry starts, I think pre-oilers might make a significang difference in wear, and in colder areas I think a block heater would help too, but that's just my thinking and not something I've actually tried.
OTOH, anyone who is worried about engine wear should probably spend some time looking through the S2kI's "The Oil Journals." Lots of good information here from RoadRage (lubrication guru) and XViper.
Originally Posted by PanteraKitty,Apr 27 2008, 06:12 PM
I've heard that the worst thing you can do is start your engine. I have also seen an Accusump system used as a pre-oiler. Just close the valves before you stop the engine and open the valves just before you start it.
I've also recently seen some info on a pre-oiler that used some kind of electric pump or motor to provide oil pressure before a clod start, but I don't recall where I saw it.
Has anyone lost an S2000 engine due to oil pressure loss during high G cornering or braking (other than cases where the oil level was obviously too low)?
Originally Posted by qbmurderer13,Apr 27 2008, 04:34 PM
isn't the reason mpg in the highwy is higher because there's less throttle required? if mpg is based solely on rpm other than throttle position then highway mpg would be worse. so then wouldn't you be better off in a gear that you can apply less throttle but still be below 3.5 rpm? red maybe you can shed some more light on this lol
BTW, I think MikeGarrison already said the same thing earlier, only in somewhat different terms.
and to maintain momentum you have to apply a certain percentage of throttle. so would it be better to drive at the lowest rpm possible with more throttle? or in a lower gear with higher rpms and less throttle? on the highway the rpms are generally higher than city driving, and throttle percentage is lower. if in the city I accelerate at 30 percent throttle but don't take it past 4k rpm, that technically translates to: more throttle, less mpg. regardless of rpm? of course if we go into the 6k+ rpm territory it might be different. I'm just thinking it would be better to cruise in 5th when your doing 40mph since you don't have to apply as much throttle to maintain that speed and the rpms are only slightly higher, similiar to what you would see on the highway.
Originally Posted by qbmurderer13,Apr 27 2008, 07:34 PM
and to maintain momentum you have to apply a certain percentage of throttle. so would it be better to drive at the lowest rpm possible with more throttle? or in a lower gear with higher rpms and less throttle? on the highway the rpms are generally higher than city driving, and throttle percentage is lower. if in the city I accelerate at 30 percent throttle but don't take it past 4k rpm, that technically translates to: more throttle, less mpg. regardless of rpm? of course if we go into the 6k+ rpm territory it might be different. I'm just thinking it would be better to cruise in 5th when your doing 40mph since you don't have to apply as much throttle to maintain that speed and the rpms are only slightly higher, similiar to what you would see on the highway.
Originally Posted by RED MX5,Apr 27 2008, 06:04 PM
Has anyone lost an S2000 engine due to oil pressure loss during high G cornering or braking (other than cases where the oil level was obviously too low)?
Originally Posted by mikegarrison,Apr 28 2008, 08:42 PM
Yes. Banked oval tracks and racing slicks have eaten a few S2000 engines due to G-induced oil starvation. The evidence for this happening in other circumstances is more spotty.
Are any of the guys running accumulators or dry sumps?
Originally Posted by RED MX5,Apr 28 2008, 10:37 PM
Are any of the guys running accumulators or dry sumps?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post




