Was this bad for my clutch?
I know I know
I just baby her way to much. Spent so much time lubing up all the contact areas of the soft top today so nothing will ever leak.
I'm starting to get better though
I just baby her way to much. Spent so much time lubing up all the contact areas of the soft top today so nothing will ever leak. I'm starting to get better though
Originally Posted by SilverKnight,Mar 8 2005, 11:23 PM
I never redline or VTEC (maybe once a week) so I think my engines still pretty strong and has some to give 

some would say otherwise
Originally Posted by oknessad,Mar 9 2005, 12:58 AM
Can I ask why you never VTEC? I read posts like yours and shake my head. It is a car! It will break sometime... All cars will. So why not use the thing!? Nothing against you personally... I'm sure there are lots of Ferrari drivers out there who never take it past the first few thousand revs for whatever reason. I just don't see the point. If you wanted a car with the power the S has at 0-5000 revs then buy a civic or some other comparable economy car. The reason the S is special (apart from handling, looks etc) is due to its awesome ability to keep on revving and do it well. It is reliable. There are plenty of cars on this board alone with over 100k and many with track days etc
Just a few things to think about...
Just a few things to think about...
Everybody has their own reason for owning one, and not all of them care that it can reliably rev to 9K RPMs. Even if the engine will withstand plenty of trips to 9K RPMs, it'll last longer if you don't rev it to 9K every day, and some people want it to last longer.
mxt, I understand what you are saying and like I said above... There are many Ferrari owners who don't take their cars to redline ever for many of the same reasons you state in your post. The thing is though, its stupid. There are other convertibles (just as there are other red, pretty looking cars) on the planet that are much cheaper if you don't care for speed, handling and all else that makes this car more expensive than say a miata. Perhaps the miata would have been a better choice for silverknight as they look similar, both are convertibles and so on. I just feel that if you are not going to use the performance of a performance vehicle you SHOULD NOT buy one.
I would argue that it is a very different story for someone with an accord. There are a myriad different reasons why someone would buy an accord and that it comes with a VTEC engine is just a byproduct of some other features. In the S, I find it hard to believe that you justified spending X number of dollars more on the S than for some other "cute convertible" based on some other feature the S has, since there just aren't that many other than engine/handling.
I completely understand comfortably cruising on the highway 70% of the time if you aren't in a rush to use every ounce of performance but if you don't wring it out and enjoy going through the twisties when you drive, you spent 10,000 too much on this car. period.
I would argue that it is a very different story for someone with an accord. There are a myriad different reasons why someone would buy an accord and that it comes with a VTEC engine is just a byproduct of some other features. In the S, I find it hard to believe that you justified spending X number of dollars more on the S than for some other "cute convertible" based on some other feature the S has, since there just aren't that many other than engine/handling.
I completely understand comfortably cruising on the highway 70% of the time if you aren't in a rush to use every ounce of performance but if you don't wring it out and enjoy going through the twisties when you drive, you spent 10,000 too much on this car. period.
I don't mean to be harsh. I think that SilverKnight has every right to spend his money however he wants but from an economic standpoint he may have made the wrong choice is the point I am making. I'm not calling him less of a person for his desicions or saying it is better/worse for the engine to rev it. It just doesn't make sense to pay for performance if you are not interested in it or are scared of future hypothetical costs you will incur due to pushing an engine that is meant to be pushed.



to you cacophony



