S2000 Talk Discussions related to the S2000, its ownership and enthusiasm for it.

Can anyone recommend a spoiler that...

Thread Tools
 
Old Jun 13, 2005 | 10:47 AM
  #21  
Lurker1222's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 373
Likes: 0
From: Miami, FL
Default

If it makes you feel any better I plan on getting it soon..
Reply
Old Jun 13, 2005 | 10:52 AM
  #22  
exceltoexcel's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 4,938
Likes: 0
From: limerick
Default

Originally Posted by civicguyinva,Jun 13 2005, 12:21 PM
I'm still waiting to have someone say if the OEM lip does any good or not.....I don't have anything on my trunk and like the very small lip/spoiler. but I hate feeling....floaty? at higher speeds. If OEM helps at all I'd rather just get that then something large.
I have a OEM spoiler, doesn't do much of anything.
Reply
Old Jun 13, 2005 | 11:31 AM
  #23  
civicguyinva's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 4,788
Likes: 0
From: Marshall, VA.
Default

I've seen GT wings that look good (in my opinion anyways) but they rippled the trunk pretty badly....what do you have to do to reinforce the trunk or buy a different trunk lid or something to support those wings?
Reply
Old Jun 13, 2005 | 12:01 PM
  #24  
Lurker1222's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 373
Likes: 0
From: Miami, FL
Default

Gives you an excuse to buy a CF trunk
Reply
Old Jun 14, 2005 | 10:36 PM
  #25  
youngjun91's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 284
Likes: 1
From: Chicagoland
Default

Originally Posted by exceltoexcel,Jun 13 2005, 10:52 AM
I have a OEM spoiler, doesn't do much of anything.
Excel, did you have not have a spoiler before to compare it to? I'm asking if you did a before and after comparison.

I also just noticed a whole bunch of cars I would consider respectable having these puny spoilers. Are they all there for looks? If I were a betting man, I'd bet no. Besides the E46 M3, the Audi S4 also has the puny spoiler...making me think that the disrupting of lift is a good idea that's catching on. Reducing lift also reduces drag. (Don't remember if that's a universal rule).
Reply
Old Jun 15, 2005 | 04:33 AM
  #26  
Destro's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 315
Likes: 0
From: New Jersey
Default

Originally Posted by i_heart_my_DB8,Jun 9 2005, 07:21 PM
Downforce = Air flow PUSHING your car down (think of the giant wing on a sprint car.)

Lift = Air flow PULLING your car up (think of an airplane, and an unspoilered Audi TT)

Negative Lift = Air flow PULLING DOWN on your car. This cannot be accomplished with anything on TOP of the car
Always trying to be helpful, I think maybe what you're going for is "Ground Effect", which you would be right in saying only works with the underbody.

From an engineering perspecitve, negative lift can be accomplished (as youngjun91 has alluded to) with negative alpha on wings on cars or airplanes, or even with sports balls (i.e., tennis, baseball, cricket, golf, etc.) having topspin.

On the issue of syntax, could we not say that wings on the back of the car "redirect" airflow? Saying that they "break up airflow" suggests that they are there to create vorticity or induce a transition to turbulent flow (which they may do as a side effect, but it's hardly the main point).
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
sosooo
S2000 Talk
18
Oct 23, 2007 03:33 PM
s2kinfinite
The S2000 Gallery
54
Jul 11, 2007 05:06 PM
Superfly05
S2000 Talk
10
Jul 30, 2005 11:14 AM
VTEC9000
S2000 Talk
2
Mar 19, 2002 08:43 AM
Eze8199
S2000 Talk
3
Oct 11, 2001 03:32 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:17 PM.