delay in acceleration?
DBW stands for ??
I get this delay acceleration too.
The heat bog explanation makes sense because when the car haven't warm up yet, the acceleration is smooth.
I guess theres nothing to cure this beside spending alot of money ??
I get this delay acceleration too.
The heat bog explanation makes sense because when the car haven't warm up yet, the acceleration is smooth.
I guess theres nothing to cure this beside spending alot of money ??
OP's question has nothing to do with lack of torque.
S2000 has enough torque below 4000 rpm like any other car. It's just that the engine does not loose torque after 6000 rpm like most other cars, but switches to "motorcycle engine" mode.
How much torque can you have, and how much acceleration can you experience in any car anyways? Most 900cc bikes will fly around you when you're at full throttle... Nonsense...
S2000 has enough torque below 4000 rpm like any other car. It's just that the engine does not loose torque after 6000 rpm like most other cars, but switches to "motorcycle engine" mode.
How much torque can you have, and how much acceleration can you experience in any car anyways? Most 900cc bikes will fly around you when you're at full throttle... Nonsense...
Originally Posted by starchland,Jul 20 2009, 01:07 PM
which begs the question, what is the use in a car that revs to 9k when the first 4k is useless?
Originally Posted by ans2k,Jul 20 2009, 08:53 PM
doesnt a cai add alot of torque between 3500 and 4000 rpm?
Originally Posted by hicabi,Jul 21 2009, 12:04 AM
OP's question has nothing to do with lack of torque.
Though if you have a torque fetish (like many people) then the S was the wrong car.
I'll go with heat bog. You'd be amazed how fast and how far the intake temps can soar when you are sitting still. The engine isn't sucking fresh air in fast enough to keep the intake cool.
I watched the intake temp on a drive over a mountain pass in my Accord the other day. Sitting still in traffic at the bottom of the mountain, temps hit 170 F (96 F ambient). At the top of the 2000-foot mountain pass, hard on the throttle for 10 miles or so, intake temps were 118 F. That's a 52 degree difference in a car that doesn't have a rep for any heat bog issues.
The S2000 already has a rep for these issues and most of us have experienced it at one point or another. Just be patient and don't expect to win any stoplight races in the summer.
I watched the intake temp on a drive over a mountain pass in my Accord the other day. Sitting still in traffic at the bottom of the mountain, temps hit 170 F (96 F ambient). At the top of the 2000-foot mountain pass, hard on the throttle for 10 miles or so, intake temps were 118 F. That's a 52 degree difference in a car that doesn't have a rep for any heat bog issues.
The S2000 already has a rep for these issues and most of us have experienced it at one point or another. Just be patient and don't expect to win any stoplight races in the summer.
Originally Posted by starchland,Jul 21 2009, 12:26 PM
please enlighten me wise one. seriously.

And I know you both know that, so untwist your Hello Kitty thongs and play nice together.
Originally Posted by thomsbrain,Jul 21 2009, 07:42 PM
Relax guys, no need to argue. Low RPM's in the S2K aren't purely useless, since the engine will pull just fine from below 2000 RPM if you aren't in a hurry. But obviously if you want to go FAST, then yeah, anything below 4000 RPM is pretty much useless. 
And I know you both know that, so untwist your Hello Kitty thongs and play nice together.

And I know you both know that, so untwist your Hello Kitty thongs and play nice together.







