S2000 Talk Discussions related to the S2000, its ownership and enthusiasm for it.

dyno 04 s2000

Thread Tools
 
Old Aug 15, 2004 | 11:16 AM
  #91  
Intrepid175's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 2,189
Likes: 0
From: Texas City
Default

Originally Posted by 00CivicSi,Aug 15 2004, 10:12 AM
Doing the test that Intrepid175 did should mimic our answers from the theoretical approach, but there will be additional deviations as some (or all) of the assumptions do not hold. The numbers that Intrepid175 gave us are close (but generally higher) than the theoretical numbers, most likely because the car begins accelerating in the next higher gear before the clutch is completely engaged.

Which brings me to my final point... Even though theoretically, shifting at either redline OR EVEN rev limiter in an 04, from 1st to 2nd, or 2nd to 3rd, should drop the engine speed below 6000 RPM, typical "spirited" acceration will probably not allow the engine speed to fall below 6000 RPM. The car will accelerate while during the brief period that the clutch is slipping enough that the engine will never fall below 6000 RPM.

As to whether the car drops out of VTEC or not... I still have some questions that I hope some can answer.
1) Does VTEC disengage when you let off of the throttle above 6000 RPM?
2) Does VTEC automatically disengage when the engine drops below 6000 RPM or is there a lower transition point (say 5000 RPM)?
I'm sure I've got more...
I can tell you this, even trying "not" to accelerate on the upshift, it was hard not to a little, especially on the 1>2 shift.

On your final point, I tend to agree. The car is accelerating hard and by the time the clutch fully hooks up you'll be very close to VTEC if not still in VTEC when things get going.

I've noticed on my car, when doing a max effort acceleration, that I sometimes get a hard surge on the upshift in the first three gears. I've always though it was because I wasn't letting off the throttle as much as I should be. Is this a symptom of the clutch slipping from that "delay" valve everyone keeps talking about?

As for your last two questions. In the 2+ years I've been loitering around this forum, they've been asked a number of times, especially the part about disengaging at a lower rpm than it engages at. No one, to my knowledge, has been able to confirm or deny either question to date. Honda certainly seems to be keeping mum about it.

Drive Safe,
Steve R.
Reply
Old Aug 15, 2004 | 02:15 PM
  #92  
00CivicSi's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 9,583
Likes: 1
From: Columbia, SC
Default

Originally Posted by Intrepid175,Aug 15 2004, 02:16 PM
As for your last two questions. In the 2+ years I've been loitering around this forum, they've been asked a number of times, especially the part about disengaging at a lower rpm than it engages at. No one, to my knowledge, has been able to confirm or deny either question to date. Honda certainly seems to be keeping mum about it.
Hmmmmmm.

I've not seen a definitive answer on these boards yet either (hence my questions ).

However, I do seem to remember a mod that Modifry came up with to use a blinker indicator on the display panel to indicate whether VTEC is engaged or not. I also remember a variation in which you can at and LED somewhere in the car as a VTEC indicator instead.

The ECU is determining when the car is in VTEC, and thus there is a signal coming from the ECU to engage VTEC. Modifry tapped into that signal, which would then light the indicator when the ECU is sending a signal to engage VTEC. From this mod, we shouldn't necessarily be able to figure out ALL of the logic behind engaging or disengaging VTEC (unless it is as simply as above/below 6000 RPM), but we sure would know when we are in VTEC and not in VTEC. This would go further to prove (or disprove) that while theoretically the 04 should drop below 6000 on the first two upshifts, that realistic shifts during quick acceleration would not cause a drop out of VTEC.

I've been thinking about doing this mod to my Civic (but there are plenty of other jobs I NEED to do before adding fun stuff). I will most likely add it when I get my S (planning on an 05 early in the year).

If you want to know more about this mod, I just found the link.

http://www.baustnet.com/honda/mods/vtec/vtec.htm

Chris
Reply
Old Aug 15, 2004 | 05:10 PM
  #93  
S2k Dude's Avatar
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 3,290
Likes: 14
From: Atlanta
Default

If you look at the VTEC transition point there is some potential to pick up some HP if you lowered the engagement point down to 5500 RPM. The only draw back is you won't get the sudden rush at the 6000 RPM changeover point since you'd be smoothing out the curve.

I think this is why you don't "feel" the VTEC transition point in other Honda engines that have i-VTEC like the RSX.

I think if somebody came up with a simple mod to drop the VTEC point down 500 RPM it would be work checking out.
Reply
Old Aug 15, 2004 | 06:44 PM
  #94  
kitwetzler's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 2,061
Likes: 0
From: Sunnyvale
Default

Originally Posted by S2k Dude,Aug 15 2004, 06:10 PM
If you look at the VTEC transition point there is some potential to pick up some HP if you lowered the engagement point down to 5500 RPM. The only draw back is you won't get the sudden rush at the 6000 RPM changeover point since you'd be smoothing out the curve.

I think this is why you don't "feel" the VTEC transition point in other Honda engines that have i-VTEC like the RSX.

I think if somebody came up with a simple mod to drop the VTEC point down 500 RPM it would be work checking out.
this is incorrect, simply changing the VTEC point won't help, you need to modify your timing and fuel curves as well.
Reply
Old Sep 4, 2004 | 12:55 PM
  #95  
Road Rage's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 3,660
Likes: 2
From: Midlothian
Default

I do not have numbers about the power, but I have driven the cars back to back, and the 2004 is quicker. The 0-60 issue is an anomaly of the gearing changes, IMO. The tests I have seen where they tracked the cars show 2004 was about a second quicker around the circuit, which is a lot. That is the bottom line of the all the dynoing and chatter on this topic for me.
Reply
Old Sep 4, 2004 | 01:50 PM
  #96  
SilverKnight's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 10,418
Likes: 0
From: Seattle
Default

yes your butt dyno

bottom line is faster 1/4 time time #s would prove it! But Nope they are all the same. Sorry bro.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Luft46
Mid-Atlantic S2000 Owners
2
Feb 7, 2004 07:50 AM
ITR #203
S2000 Talk
75
Feb 5, 2004 09:19 AM
David NJ
S2000 Talk
59
Feb 1, 2004 09:18 PM
Clovis
S2000 Talk
5
Nov 23, 2003 01:32 PM
S2kRob
Southern Ontario S2000 Owners
76
Nov 10, 2003 04:51 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:30 PM.