Engine replacement: AP1 or AP2
Originally Posted by JUSTINTHECOASTIE' timestamp='1408300107' post='23290505
[quote name='ZDan' timestamp='1408279938' post='23290258']
If you have a bias, you are *biased*, not "bias"!
I'd definitely try to get an '04/'05 2.2 liter. Just don't take it to 9k all the time! 8500-8600 should be a safe limit, with occasional excursions to 9k. I think...
If you have a bias, you are *biased*, not "bias"!
I'd definitely try to get an '04/'05 2.2 liter. Just don't take it to 9k all the time! 8500-8600 should be a safe limit, with occasional excursions to 9k. I think...
[/quote]
yes, I edited it to what I wanted to say
OP hasn't been on in 4 days so I doubt he's still reading this, but here I go:
For general purpose, the F22C is the better choice. The larger displacement offers an earlier powerband and a flatter torque line. The F22C is also considered to have a more robust valvetrain than the F20C.
The only time an F20C might be a better choice is if you're planning on going very high HP on a stock engine. The lower rod length and higher redline helps keep the car in the same gear longer, and therefore also in the boost plot.
For general purpose, the F22C is the better choice. The larger displacement offers an earlier powerband and a flatter torque line. The F22C is also considered to have a more robust valvetrain than the F20C.
The only time an F20C might be a better choice is if you're planning on going very high HP on a stock engine. The lower rod length and higher redline helps keep the car in the same gear longer, and therefore also in the boost plot.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
civic5133
Archived Member S2000 Classifieds and For Sale
5
Dec 31, 2009 03:31 AM






