S2000 Talk Discussions related to the S2000, its ownership and enthusiasm for it.

Fragile S2000 windshield?

Thread Tools
 
Old Nov 26, 2001 | 06:04 PM
  #21  
Barry in Wyoming's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 4,762
Likes: 1
From: Sheridan
Default

Originally posted by calc

I'd say that's because Honda used poor quality glass, so I do blame Honda for it, even though they don't cover replacement by warranty.
I think you are way off base. Honda uses lighter, thinner, softer glass but I don't think they use poor quality glass at all. The lighter, thinner and softer, the fewer thousands of dollars of plastic surgery YOU MIGHT NEED if you fly through the thing.

Twenty years ago, windshields (windscreens outside of the U.S.A.) were much tougher. Also, during a windshield encounter, you were much more likely to be killed or -- literally -- defaced.

I bet the Porsches and Beemers have the same problems. I didn't know that a replacemet was $900. Maybe I will get the full coverage glass insurance. My windshield is still perfect at 3,500 miles.
Reply
Old Nov 26, 2001 | 06:32 PM
  #22  
SoloVR6's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 413
Likes: 0
From: Chicago
Default

Update: I was quoted $385 (dealer price) for a Honda windshield and $125 to install it. I could have taken it to the dealer but they just gave me the number of the place they use to install all their windshields.

I haven't checked into the PPG window yet.
Reply
Old Nov 26, 2001 | 08:55 PM
  #23  
calc's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 1,020
Likes: 0
From: San Diego
Default

Barry, if the seat belts and air bag work properly, I should never be anywhere near a windshield. I certainly wasn't when I crashed into a center divider at speed a while back avoiding someone who pulled out in front of me.

I'd be interested in reading any information you can refer me to about manufacturers selecting lighter, thinner, softer glass out of regard for customers. I suspect it's more out of regard for the bottom line.

cal
Reply
Old Nov 26, 2001 | 09:46 PM
  #24  
tokyo_james's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 65,827
Likes: 2
From: FCUK
Default

Originally posted by calc
Barry, if the seat belts and air bag work properly, I should never be anywhere near a windshield. I certainly wasn't when I crashed into a center divider at speed a while back avoiding someone who pulled out in front of me.

I'd be interested in reading any information you can refer me to about manufacturers selecting lighter, thinner, softer glass out of regard for customers. I suspect it's more out of regard for the bottom line.

cal

They have to consider pedestrians as well don't they? These are the people most likely to be coming into sudden contact with the windscreen! I guess that they may also consider the fact that some people may not be wearing their seatbelts..?!?
Reply
Old Nov 27, 2001 | 04:36 AM
  #25  
Barry in Wyoming's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 4,762
Likes: 1
From: Sheridan
Default

Originally posted by calc

I'd be interested in reading any information you can refer me to about manufacturers selecting lighter, thinner, softer glass out of regard for customers
cal
Cal, I'll try to find something in print. My source is Dave Parker, the owner of Parker Glass here in Sheridan. Dave and I have been friends for 24 years and he's done all my glass work at home, office and cars. He told me this once when I was getting a new windshield for an Accord. I told him I'd never had such problems with my '74 Dodge Dart, and Dave told me that glass standards have changed to make them both safer in an accident and more vulnerable.
Reply
Old Nov 27, 2001 | 05:53 AM
  #26  
Bruinlax's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 291
Likes: 0
From: San Francisco
Default

Here's my question - Isn't it bad to file insurance claims with your company over a -relatively- small repair.

I'm concerned because i want to replace my windshield, but i'd rather eat the cost of it if my insurance would be raised or not lowered eventually because of a small claim like this.
Reply
Old Nov 27, 2001 | 07:52 AM
  #27  
Tox's Avatar
Tox
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 616
Likes: 0
From: The wilds of
Default

[QUOTE]Originally posted by Barry WY Silver/Black '01
[B]

...I bet the Porsches and Beemers have the same problems.
Reply
Old Nov 27, 2001 | 03:48 PM
  #28  
s2ktaxi's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 4,436
Likes: 0
From: WA
Default

Originally posted by Bruinlax
Here's my question - Isn't it bad to file insurance claims with your company over a -relatively- small repair.

I'm concerned because i want to replace my windshield, but i'd rather eat the cost of it if my insurance would be raised or not lowered eventually because of a small claim like this.
That depends on the state you are in and your specific insurance policy - here in MA, we can change a windshield with no deductible or any detrimental effect on premiums.
Reply
Old Nov 27, 2001 | 11:06 PM
  #29  
calc's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 1,020
Likes: 0
From: San Diego
Default

One more observation. My 1999 Jaguar XKR coupe, which has c. 12k miles on it, has a perfectly clear, unblemished windshield. Is this just because it has a little more slope to it? I think not.

cal
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2001 | 02:29 AM
  #30  
s2ktaxi's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 4,436
Likes: 0
From: WA
Default

Luck? Or maybe you don't drive it as close to other cars?
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:13 AM.