S2000 Talk Discussions related to the S2000, its ownership and enthusiasm for it.

Handling at the limits: low vs. high speed

Thread Tools
 
Old Dec 28, 2015 | 10:24 AM
  #11  
Jah2000's Avatar
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 1,370
Likes: 138
From: Cali
Default

When I first got my MY03 (100% stock; balance is rear-bias), it oversteered like a MF.

Recently switched the swaybars to: MY00-01 Front and MY04-07 Rear..so the swaybar balance is now front-bias. Handles a dream now and like a different animal - very confident, feels more neutral but still can oversteer when needed, much easier to drive, rear feels more grippy/heavier/planted, much easier to correct and catch, can take turns faster, more predictable, more progressive, etc., etc.

Next plan is to switch the stock rear-bias springs with front-bias springs (with CR shocks); like the CR or Swift Spec-R springs. That should bring me another big step-up in improvement.
Reply
Old Dec 28, 2015 | 12:18 PM
  #12  
s2000Junky's Avatar
Community Organizer
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 31,070
Likes: 566
Default

The faster you go, the more inertia is at play. A fast Auto X set up isn't going to be an optimum road course set up as a result. The S rear end will want to come around on you the higher rate of speed you make directional changes. You can tune your suspension and add down force to help tame this, but this is the natural tendency of the car. For auto X, a car that more easily rotates at slower speeds is usually appreciated and quicker, but a handful at high speed and usually slower as a result. I have found through trial and error a good all around neutral set up for street and fast/controllable balance for high speed road course without a rear wing is, my stock 01 front sway bar, with an ap2 rear bar, and the same spring rate front to rear with a near factory tire stagger, what ever widths you choose to run(tune your spring rate for your tire widths/compound grip) For me its 255/295 so I run 14k. I currently have the 2nd quickest known NA street tire class s2k at my 2.5m track with this config, for what its worth.
Reply
Old Dec 28, 2015 | 01:03 PM
  #13  
Deleted03.15's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 368
Likes: 10
Default

Try a set of Yokohama AD08-R tyres....taking your 2000 to a track is the best way to fully understand its handling. Honda deliberately placed the engine behind the front axle to at least reduce nasty under-steer....
Many years ago I had a mk1 MR2 which I used to take around the quiet roundabouts outside of town, it was here that I would push harder & harder in 2nd gear provoking the rear to step out whilst applying opposite lock, keeping your foot on the gas is essential though your head is telling you otherwise....take a look at Mr Harris explaining more..
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m2Vt3ybz0t0
Reply
Old Dec 28, 2015 | 01:10 PM
  #14  
yitznewton's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Aug 2015
Posts: 221
Likes: 0
From: NJ
Default

Originally Posted by s2000Junky
The faster you go, the more inertia is at play. A fast Auto X set up isn't going to be an optimum road course set up as a result. The S rear end will want to come around on you the higher rate of speed you make directional changes. You can tune your suspension and add down force to help tame this, but this is the natural tendency of the car. For auto X, a car that more easily rotates at slower speeds is usually appreciated and quicker, but a handful at high speed and usually slower as a result.
Ah, this is the sort of info I was looking for.
Reply
Old Jan 18, 2016 | 12:50 PM
  #15  
Billj747's Avatar
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,683
Likes: 25
From: SoFlo
Default

The S2K's short wheelbase makes it rotate very well. At low speeds on an autoX its a lot easier to catch than at higher speeds where the characteristic becomes more 'twitchy'. At much higher speeds (70+) the car creates lift and becomes even less stable, this is why adding a wing to an S2K does wonders for confidence, grip, and lap times for road racing.

Driving wise, these are good reads:

http://www.motoiq.com/MagazineArticl...r-Control.aspx

http://www.motoiq.com/MagazineArticl...Processes.aspx


B
Reply
Old Jan 19, 2016 | 06:33 AM
  #16  
Spagolli94's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 150
Likes: 0
Default

I've only ever accidentally spun out one time in my life. I happened to be test driving an AP1 S2000 about 5 years ago. At that time, I had no idea they were prone to oversteer. I was exiting a corner and got on the gas. The next thing I knew, I was facing the wrong direction. Luckily, the sales guy didn't come along for the drive. haha. I didn't end up buying that car but I now own an AP2. I've heard the AP2 is less prone to snap oversteer, but I'm still a bit weary and cautious when getting on the gas as I exit corners.
Reply
Old Jan 19, 2016 | 07:41 AM
  #17  
Saki GT's Avatar
Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 36,017
Likes: 226
From: Queen City, NC
Default

Originally Posted by Fokker
Everyone must have some significantly modified suspensions. If the suspension balance is close to stock, you should not be able to get the car to understeer first unless you're doing some boneheaded driving.
Afaik, stock AP2s will understeer initially but that is easily modulated with the throttle. Drive into a corner too fast, turn the wheel, and the car will definitely scrub on the fronts initially.
Reply
Old Jan 19, 2016 | 08:25 AM
  #18  
Billj747's Avatar
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,683
Likes: 25
From: SoFlo
Default

? You can still make a stock AP2 oversteer on entry with trailbraking...
Reply
Old Jan 19, 2016 | 11:07 AM
  #19  
Jah2000's Avatar
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 1,370
Likes: 138
From: Cali
Default

After owning my current Ap1 for around 3 months now (daily driver), I can def say that my old S13 that I had in the late '90s oversteered a lot more. Maybe in a diff way. But, my old S13 was way more slide'y and oversteered a lot (I've spun that thing out a few times on accident at low speeds).

To me, I feel that the S13 was loose mainly due to the weight being mostly in the front; whereas the S2k is a 50/50 balance, has a lot more grip and modern suspension engineering in it. It honestly feels like driving a super grippy 4x4 compared to the S13 drift machine.
Reply
Old Jan 19, 2016 | 11:15 AM
  #20  
02ap1pilot's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by gerry100
don't feel that you have to drive the S faster than the Jetta in the same situation, they are two different animals, one you know and one you don't.

Feel the feedback during every drive you take in the S at any speed. As you learn how the car acts your confidence and speed will increase.

Think less, drive more
i love what you said here!!!! its all about that seat time baby
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:48 AM.