S2000 Talk Discussions related to the S2000, its ownership and enthusiasm for it.

HP of the AP2 S2000?

Thread Tools
 
Old Apr 13, 2008 | 12:07 PM
  #21  
RED MX5's Avatar
Registered User
Member (Premium)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 7,087
Likes: 2
From: Dry Branch
Default

LOL, yea, as far as I am aware, I'm have the only S2000 with 4.30 gears.

Is anybody else running 4.30:1?
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2008 | 12:15 PM
  #22  
HighwayStar's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,185
Likes: 0
From: Miami FL
Default

Originally Posted by Ks320,Apr 13 2008, 04:18 AM
both the stock cars have f20c engines

the red one has shorter final gear

i would like to look at that video as a ap1 vs ap2 suspension thing ...
oh >< i didnt know they were both FC20. isaw it was an AP2 and guess it had an FC22
Reply
Old Apr 18, 2008 | 07:46 PM
  #23  
s2000Junky's Avatar
Community Organizer
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 31,070
Likes: 566
Default

[QUOTE=RED MX5,Apr 13 2008, 12:07 PM] LOL, yea, as far as I am aware, I'm have the only S2000 with 4.30 gears.

Is anybody else running 4.30:1?
Reply
Old Apr 18, 2008 | 07:48 PM
  #24  
s2000Junky's Avatar
Community Organizer
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 31,070
Likes: 566
Default

Originally Posted by RED MX5,Apr 12 2008, 12:18 PM
The way I measure my WHP is more conservative than most dynos, so I'm not sure that direct comparisons really tell us much, but the early AP1's like mine have the lowest output of any of the cars, and with the temperatures in the 90's and at an altitude of 550 feet above sealevel, my uncorrected measurements were around 187 WHP (back when the car was bone stock). I never did any measurements with the stock car in cooler weather, but of course the numbers would be a little higher if it hadn't been so darn hot. The MY02-03 cars run a little leaner and make a little more power as a result (due entirely to differences in the ECU), but I don't recall seeing any of the later AP1's making over 200 WHP while still bone stock. On any given day and dyno, the range from the weakest to strongest S2000 is under 20 WHP, and the weakest AP1's still reach 60 MPH quicker because of the gearing difference and the extra shift required with the AP2. It's really the added low end torque of the F22C that improves the cars drivability, and IMO there are much better reasons for selecting an AP2 (or for that matter an AP1) than just the differences in WHP. There are differences (on both sides) that can be felt, and enjoyed, but the difference in peak power isn't one of them. It's offset by extra weight and larger tires, and doesn't even make the AP2 quicker in the best quarter mile times we've seen. But dang it, I have to say that I think buying an S2000 becuase of its horsepower, 0-60 time, or quarter mile time, doesn't make a lot of sense to me. If those are the things that matter most, neither AP1 nor AP2 is going to be a great choice. Heck, you can build a quicker Miata (starting with a used car) cheaper than you can buy any (stock) S2000 that hasn't been trashed and/or abused.
I would agree with this...
Reply
Old Apr 18, 2008 | 07:50 PM
  #25  
s2000Junky's Avatar
Community Organizer
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 31,070
Likes: 566
Default

Originally Posted by Ks320,Apr 13 2008, 05:18 AM
I believe it was more like 4.56, based on where the car was hitting the rev-limiter in the video ... I just used a gearing calculator and checked out the vehicle speeds had the car used different final gearings.

The translation was a bit messed up. In the beginning the narrator said the car only has intake and suspension mods. Then later he goes and says the car also has shorter final gearing.
yeah I think they said it was 4.30 didn't they?
Reply
Old Apr 18, 2008 | 08:35 PM
  #26  
qbmurderer13's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 2,140
Likes: 0
From: Orlando, FL
Default

Originally Posted by s2000Junky,Apr 18 2008, 11:50 PM
yeah I think they said it was 4.30 didn't they?
I watched the video a bunch of times trying to figure out what final drive he had if he indeed have one but they dont mention it at all, does anybody know for sure its a 4.56 or what?
Reply
Old Apr 19, 2008 | 09:14 PM
  #27  
Ks320's Avatar
Registered User
Gold Member (Premium)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 5,252
Likes: 1
From: Hong Kong
Default

Originally Posted by s2000Junky,Apr 18 2008, 10:50 PM
yeah I think they said it was 4.30 didn't they?
That was from the English translation ... unless you unrdetsand Japanese? I was suspecting there is something wrong with the translation, that's all.

Anyway, I'm just making sure. Cuz when I plug 4.3 into gear ratio calculator, it looks like the car should be going faster than when the car hit the speed limiter. But then I could be wrong, because the S's digital speedo does delay a bit when under hard acceleration.

In any case, if it really is 4.3 ... looks like 4.3 really is quite a good change for AP1s! Maybe I should look into that. Always thought 4.3 and 4.4 gears wouldn't be aggressive / big of a change enough to produce any noticeable improvements

Reply
Old Apr 19, 2008 | 09:40 PM
  #28  
s2000Junky's Avatar
Community Organizer
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 31,070
Likes: 566
Default

Originally Posted by Ks320,Apr 19 2008, 09:14 PM
That was from the English translation ... unless you unrdetsand Japanese? I was suspecting there is something wrong with the translation, that's all.

Anyway, I'm just making sure. Cuz when I plug 4.3 into gear ratio calculator, it looks like the car should be going faster than when the car hit the speed limiter. But then I could be wrong, because the S's digital speedo does delay a bit when under hard acceleration.

In any case, if it really is 4.3 ... looks like 4.3 really is quite a good change for AP1s! Maybe I should look into that. Always thought 4.3 and 4.4 gears wouldn't be aggressive / big of a change enough to produce any noticeable improvements

Well i'll tell you this from experience, in the realm of gears, more isn't always better contrary to what many seem to think on this web sight. You will notice on your gear calculator that a 4.44 in an Ap1 will get you to a perfect 60mph in one shift and should get you to the end of the quarter in the fastest time as well do to the rpm in 4th gear that you will hit the finish line in, this will fluctuate do to power output, but this is considering near stock power. Any other gear choice above this requires more shifting= loss of time as well as the whp effectiveness reduced by the trq multiplication of the higher gear set.

General rule is the more hp/trq you make the less gear multiplication you want to run or will be at the expense of maximizing your forward hp/trq propulsion balance. 4.3 is a noticeable improvement. 4.44 is the max I would go for a good balance of trq multiplication out of a dig and hyw pull. Unless you are building a track specific car with a speed range that will be better maximized with a higher set for a particular track, then I wouldn't recommend anything higher. Gears are great for getting out of the hole to make your first shift, but after your rolling already they are more of a limitation. I hear of FI guys running 4.56 or 4.77's and I think to myself, they probably 9 times out of 10 got the gears first without fully realizing what they have done or ended up with now that they are FI and now have no comparison to see how much better their trap times could be in the quart for example with closer to stock gearing.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
charlie15
Australia & New Zealand S2000 Owners
0
Sep 16, 2015 10:42 PM
Chris1991
S2000 Talk
11
Jun 25, 2013 05:47 PM
tbp5022
New York - Metro New York S2000 Owners
3
Jun 28, 2011 03:49 PM
808eelttam
Car and Bike Talk
16
Oct 6, 2008 06:48 PM
Blitzinger
Introductions
31
Jul 25, 2007 06:58 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:40 PM.