j's racing rca question
for the front RCA, there are L1, L2, S1, S2
S1 and S2 are for lowering 0~40mm
L1 and L2 are for lowering more than 40mm
S2/L2 will give you more camber than S1/L1
they use to design 2 thickness, now they change to 2 pieces so you can take the extra piece off and make L into S
S1 and S2 are for lowering 0~40mm
L1 and L2 are for lowering more than 40mm
S2/L2 will give you more camber than S1/L1
they use to design 2 thickness, now they change to 2 pieces so you can take the extra piece off and make L into S
S1/L1 = 2-5 degrees camber
S2/L2 = 3-6 degrees camber
This piece is a 2 parter...
Do you need / want to add more than 2 degrees of camber or are you looking for the RCA function plus the camber correction?
The original concept was that when the car has been lowered more than 40mm the roll center needed to be adjusted, using the L2 camber joint effectively spaced the lower arm down so that the geometry of the suspension was returned to a more neutral position where Honda's engineers designed it to be most effective.
If your car has not been lowered more than 40mm then the roll center of the suspension geometry does not need to be corrected.
I believe you can still order the S1 or S2 which will only allow you to dial in more camber, no RCA correction (slightly cheaper but not worth it IMO). If you order the L1 or L2 the spacer is supplied which can be installed for roll center correction or it can be left off if its not needed. Lots of options here
when the car is lower maybe 20mm, even stock can get more than 2 degrees, S1/L1 adds no more than 1 degree on top of that
i think S1/S2 still "changes" some roll center (i don't use the word "correct" anymore cos now i donno which one is the "correct" setup for different setups)
wat J's says about RCA is it raises the roll center back up closer to the center gravity, the closer the CG and RC is, the less body roll the car will have on the same spring rate
i forgot if J's mentions about the geometry, but i believe the car will have closer geometry to stock, on the other words i think the camber, caster changes during body roll is closer to what a stock S behaves
however tho, there is no easy way to calculate the "new geometry" and then dial in the ride height/spring rate into a good balance, it will take a driver to drive good and knows a good amount of true feedback to tune it right
sometimes when you have really stiff spring rate, street tire grip, stiffer sway bars, maybe you won't need that much carmber or camber gain anymore
i think S1/S2 still "changes" some roll center (i don't use the word "correct" anymore cos now i donno which one is the "correct" setup for different setups)
wat J's says about RCA is it raises the roll center back up closer to the center gravity, the closer the CG and RC is, the less body roll the car will have on the same spring rate
i forgot if J's mentions about the geometry, but i believe the car will have closer geometry to stock, on the other words i think the camber, caster changes during body roll is closer to what a stock S behaves
however tho, there is no easy way to calculate the "new geometry" and then dial in the ride height/spring rate into a good balance, it will take a driver to drive good and knows a good amount of true feedback to tune it right
sometimes when you have really stiff spring rate, street tire grip, stiffer sway bars, maybe you won't need that much carmber or camber gain anymore
Originally Posted by rob.ok,Aug 22 2008, 10:33 PM
S1 or S2 which will only allow you to dial in more camber, no RCA correction (slightly cheaper but not worth it IMO).

i get the difference between s1/l1 vs s2/l2, i just didn't get the difference between the S and L. now i do thank you so much!
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
tekstyle
S2000 Brakes and Suspension
2
Apr 29, 2014 09:15 PM
jimtway1
Socal Swap Meet
1
May 18, 2012 03:34 PM
jimtway1
R&C Parts For Sale
1
May 18, 2012 03:33 PM



