S2000 Talk Discussions related to the S2000, its ownership and enthusiasm for it.

make the sk2 more POWER efficient

Thread Tools
 
Old Jun 27, 2006 | 06:19 PM
  #31  
MULDER's Avatar
Community Organizer
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 11,936
Likes: 12
From: Charleston
Default

Originally Posted by Hero,Jun 27 2006, 06:52 PM
damn...you're right.

that would explain why mine didn't do anything special....i stopped at 86! looks like it's time for one more test run.


oh, and i almost posted that we posted at the same time too. now that would have been odd.
Great Scott!

You could have caused a time paradox, the result of which could cause a chain reaction that would unravel the very fabric of the space-time continuum and destroy the entire universe! Granted that's a worst case scenario. The destruction might in fact be very localized, limited to merely our own galaxy.











Reply
Old Jun 27, 2006 | 10:53 PM
  #32  
turbo997's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by [AP2-2NV
,Jun 27 2006, 09:43 AM] here's a video to show the gear advantage.

http://videos.streetfire.net/player.aspx?f...15-6F484EAAEF59

a stock s2000 vs. an s2000 with intake, exhaust and gears.

the gears don't increase your power, they just get you through the gears quicker, you accelerate much quicker. the advantage gears have is also shown more in 1st, 2nd, and 3rd.
please dont toss rocks when I ask this question: what is I/E
Reply
Old Jun 27, 2006 | 11:24 PM
  #33  
Blue_S2's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,946
Likes: 0
From: West Los Angeles
Default

Intake/Exhaust
Reply
Old Jun 27, 2006 | 11:58 PM
  #34  
Hero's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 3,368
Likes: 0
From: Aliso Viejo
Default

Originally Posted by MulderATO,Jun 27 2006, 06:19 PM
Great Scott!

You could have caused a time paradox, the result of which could cause a chain reaction that would unravel the very fabric of the space-time continuum and destroy the entire universe! Granted that's a worst case scenario. The destruction might in fact be very localized, limited to merely our own galaxy.











whoa...that's heavy.
Reply
Old Jun 28, 2006 | 04:51 AM
  #35  
MULDER's Avatar
Community Organizer
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 11,936
Likes: 12
From: Charleston
Default

Reply
Old Jun 28, 2006 | 08:02 PM
  #36  
turbo997's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
Default

ok....star trek language or sometihing here...im lost
Reply
Old Jun 29, 2006 | 03:11 AM
  #37  
minam3169's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,376
Likes: 0
From: Hawaii Baby!
Default

turbo997, your profile doesn't state your age but I think you might wanna check out a flick from 1985 called "Back to the Future" to get what they're talking about
Reply
Old Jun 29, 2006 | 03:24 AM
  #38  
1Ferris's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 285
Likes: 0
From: Bamberg, Germany
Default

Originally Posted by Hero,Jun 27 2006, 11:58 PM
whoa...that's heavy.

What? Is there something wrong with the earth's gravitational pull in the future?


















Thanks guys. Now I will have Hewey(sp) Louis's song "Back In Time" and "The Power of Love" in my head all day.
Reply
Old Jun 29, 2006 | 04:26 AM
  #39  
vtec9's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 10,106
Likes: 5
From: Connecticut
Default

I wanna go baack in tieemeee!!
Reply
Old Jun 29, 2006 | 05:58 AM
  #40  
Poindexter's Avatar
Former Moderator
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 24,162
Likes: 3
From: Burlington, VT
Default

You guys are funny as hell but you forgot the best part - the flux capacitor can run on beer, so you've got a great excuse to transport alcohol.....and swerving is a blast when your car flies
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:42 AM.