Miata + S2000 = M2000?
Registered User
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 4,467
Likes: 3
From: Davie, FL
Originally Posted by scottrunsxc,Jul 18 2007, 03:55 PM
I don't see where you're getting this lack of respect thing from.
Let's keep the thread focused on what's important - this is an amazing project that is close to coming to fruition. And no, I'm not saying Miata drivers are fruits
.
Registered User
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
what a shame for a troll to come along and attempt to ruin such a good thread and such an absolutely amazing build. as other's said, you know you're doing good when people you don't even know are hating on you
info on magnamx-5:
http://www.cardomain.com/ride/2257729
http://www.amazon.com/gp/pdp/profile/A1QURUBS57L5IB
http://www.fastforwardsuperchargers.com/fo...hp?t=610&page=4
info on magnamx-5:
http://www.cardomain.com/ride/2257729
http://www.amazon.com/gp/pdp/profile/A1QURUBS57L5IB
http://www.fastforwardsuperchargers.com/fo...hp?t=610&page=4
Registered User
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Fyrestrike,Jul 18 2007, 11:42 AM
Agreed! This is one of the main reasons for choosing the Miata for a chassis. I do think, and will argue however, that the F20C is better than the Miata 1.6/1.8L engines in every way. I took a good chassis, and put a GREAT engine in it. Even if I had intentions to boost I'd probably still have done this, isn't it better to start with a better base before adding boost? The S2000 motor responds to boost much better than the Miata engines do.
I am excited to see the beast this weekend. Any plans on autocrossing this beast?
Banned
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 162
Likes: 0
From: Northern Cuba.. err Miami
I don't get why people have such a hard time between a Street, Track, and Drag Strip car. So sad.
Alex do you think that the numbers you produced may be higher solely based on LESS drive train loss which resulted in HIGHER wheel horsepower?
Since you did so much to tie down that beast maybe it helped in transferring the power from the crank to the real wheel better? Whose to say that if we didn't take your exact setup (tune, intake, header/exhaust, and springs) and put it in an stock s2000 body that we would produce the same results?
Alex do you think that the numbers you produced may be higher solely based on LESS drive train loss which resulted in HIGHER wheel horsepower?
Since you did so much to tie down that beast maybe it helped in transferring the power from the crank to the real wheel better? Whose to say that if we didn't take your exact setup (tune, intake, header/exhaust, and springs) and put it in an stock s2000 body that we would produce the same results?
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by PrOsPeCt S,Jul 18 2007, 09:22 AM
yea i really hope so to cuz i just gave them a piece of my mind F******pricks
think they know it all
think they know it all
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Fyrestrike,Jul 18 2007, 11:33 AM
Agreed, this is certainly something I considered when I was planning to build a track Miata.� I went for a ride in a turbo Miata driven by a Chin instructor at Sebring which REALLY turned me off to the whole idea.� The motor is a dog out of boost and his horsepower was fluctuating way too much mid corner from being on and off the throttle.�
Also, turbo cars are MUCH more high maintenance than NA motors are.� My intent was to put together a car which would spend as little time with the hood open as possible.� My engine is making Miata turbo (low boost) horsepower and is 100% stock, S2000 guys on the west coast are getting years of reliability from these motors, how can you beat that?
I'm beginning to sense some ignorance here but I'll humor you.� If you recall from high school math (it's probably been a week or so since you were there) you'd know that hp/weight ratio is calculated by dividing weight by horsepower...
GT3: 3075lbs/415hp=7.4 lbs/hp�� (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Porsche_997)
M2000: 2010lbs/(232.6*1.20) adding 20% for drivetrain loss to get crank hp
� � � � � � 2010lbs/279hp=7.2lbs/hp
Still with me? My power to weight is actually a bit better than the GT3, however there are many other factors that define a quick car so I'm not saying by any means that my car is better than a GT3.
I would love for you to come out to some autocrosses or track days (assuming you're local) to see how your Miatas compare.� I'm more into real driving than magazine/forum racing anyway...
If it's not obvious, from the get go I had no interest in driving this car on the street.� Also, if you come out to a track day, I don't want to here these kinds of reasons when your car can't run all day or when you can't keep up so save it.
No doubt, I had no intention of putting more torque down than I need.� It's very difficult to fit any kind of substantial rubber under the Miata so 150wtq is more than enough for my purposes.
Oh, but the butchering was so fun!� I will absolutely enjoy this car and I appreciate any feedback on it (good or bad).��
Also, turbo cars are MUCH more high maintenance than NA motors are.� My intent was to put together a car which would spend as little time with the hood open as possible.� My engine is making Miata turbo (low boost) horsepower and is 100% stock, S2000 guys on the west coast are getting years of reliability from these motors, how can you beat that?
I'm beginning to sense some ignorance here but I'll humor you.� If you recall from high school math (it's probably been a week or so since you were there) you'd know that hp/weight ratio is calculated by dividing weight by horsepower...
GT3: 3075lbs/415hp=7.4 lbs/hp�� (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Porsche_997)
M2000: 2010lbs/(232.6*1.20) adding 20% for drivetrain loss to get crank hp
� � � � � � 2010lbs/279hp=7.2lbs/hp
Still with me? My power to weight is actually a bit better than the GT3, however there are many other factors that define a quick car so I'm not saying by any means that my car is better than a GT3.
I would love for you to come out to some autocrosses or track days (assuming you're local) to see how your Miatas compare.� I'm more into real driving than magazine/forum racing anyway...
If it's not obvious, from the get go I had no interest in driving this car on the street.� Also, if you come out to a track day, I don't want to here these kinds of reasons when your car can't run all day or when you can't keep up so save it.
No doubt, I had no intention of putting more torque down than I need.� It's very difficult to fit any kind of substantial rubber under the Miata so 150wtq is more than enough for my purposes.
Oh, but the butchering was so fun!� I will absolutely enjoy this car and I appreciate any feedback on it (good or bad).��
So long as you keep your current attitude about the car you will enjoy it, for many years to come and end up with exactly what you like kudos.
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,823
Likes: 1
Let me explain it to you. The reason we are calling you a troll, besides the fact that you are, is because you created a profile on a forum you have no interest in, just to come on here and bash Alex's project, because plain and simple, that's what you've done. This is also referred to as being a Hater. If you don't like it, don't click on it. Obviously this project has been noticed on Miata forums, hence the reason your trolling ass is on here. This is great news to Alex and his friends who've helped him on this project. I for sure am glad this project has extended so far as to being noticed on other forums and groups. Like Juan said "you know you're doing good when someone u don't even know is hating on u". So go back to your own forum, we have no need for you here. I'll give you one more post to redeem yourself with some dignity, after that every one of your posts will be deleted, no need to ruin this thread.