MX-5 vs. S2000?
Ah, the aggressive ignorance continues apace....
I don't care whether one prefers one or the other; I prefer driving my S2000 to any Miata, on the street.
But to trot out tripe like
or
takes aggressive ignorance to a new level.
Not that that surprises me any more around here.
I don't care whether one prefers one or the other; I prefer driving my S2000 to any Miata, on the street.
But to trot out tripe like
Bottom line: chick car
There are more miatas being raced than s2ks, simply because the cost of entry is lower, and if you wad one up, it only cost you a 2-5 grand (unless we're talking front runner cars), as opposed to the cheapest race prepped s2k which will cost you at least 10k.
Not that that surprises me any more around here.
Originally Posted by LowFlyin',Feb 24 2011, 06:00 PM
I've been a Honda fanboi since I first got spanked in my Z31 by an EG Civic.
Never been a fan of convertibles until I was put in a situation to acquire a Miata. It was a 10AE, so that means NB chassis and 6-speed gear box. The car was a lot of fun, and the first time I took the hardtop off I realized how cool a convertible can be. If it wasn't for my 10AE, I never would have considered an S2000.
So, to Mazda...I can say thanks for that.
...but I never really connected with the Miata. Outside of a tight autoX I found myself getting bored. I took the car to track events and the car saw either 1 track day or autoX / month during season if not more...but it was still just a car. Something I'd get into to go to work everyday. One of my autoX buddies that owns a MSM hopped in for a ride during one of my fastest times of the day and we actually had a conversation almost the length of the run. He commented about it after we stopped to observe the time how different the Miata was compared to my CRX and that he knew the car didn't require my full concentration because of we were able to talk during a fast run.
They are good cars, though. ...and I've heard SM is a blast to race in. I'd like to give it a try one day...maybe.
Never been a fan of convertibles until I was put in a situation to acquire a Miata. It was a 10AE, so that means NB chassis and 6-speed gear box. The car was a lot of fun, and the first time I took the hardtop off I realized how cool a convertible can be. If it wasn't for my 10AE, I never would have considered an S2000.
So, to Mazda...I can say thanks for that.
...but I never really connected with the Miata. Outside of a tight autoX I found myself getting bored. I took the car to track events and the car saw either 1 track day or autoX / month during season if not more...but it was still just a car. Something I'd get into to go to work everyday. One of my autoX buddies that owns a MSM hopped in for a ride during one of my fastest times of the day and we actually had a conversation almost the length of the run. He commented about it after we stopped to observe the time how different the Miata was compared to my CRX and that he knew the car didn't require my full concentration because of we were able to talk during a fast run.
They are good cars, though. ...and I've heard SM is a blast to race in. I'd like to give it a try one day...maybe.

Honda's race heritage far exceeds Mazda on every level. I was not referring to the number of the cars that are raced on any given weekend.
Keeping it to the cars we're actually talking about, the Miata has way way way more "race heritage" than the S2000.
MX-5's get raced because there's 25 years of high mileage cars to buy and race and they're dirt cheap.
Gear box. No car reviewer has ever raved about the gear box in the MX-5
like EVERYONE did on the S. It's also using carbon syncros, I don't recall the MX-5 going that far. (correct me if I'm wrong)
Handling is easy, not race oriented. Let's not forget Honda softened up the car in later years for bad drivers.
As for "easy", the Miata's handling is more linear, and that's not a bad thing at all. The AP1's rear toe monkeymotion was a dumb idea from day one... That it's "harder" for the uninitiated to drive does not in itself mean it's better or racier.
I'm not really knocking the MX-5, it's just not the same car. It's a two seater but the life the S has is really much different. I always wonder why people feel the need to compare them.
Originally Posted by js_2000,Feb 24 2011, 03:26 PM
The only reason why you buy a Miata, is because you cannot afford an S.
Like the only reason to buy a Cayman, is because you cannot afford a 911
Like the only reason to buy a Cayman, is because you cannot afford a 911
Also, I LIKE the Cayman better than the 911.
By your reasoning, you could say that the only reason any of us bought an S2000 was because we couldn't afford a Corvette convertible.
I could've spent a lot more, but there simply weren't any sports cars I wanted more.
The same is true for MANY Miata owners.
I respect Miatas but I could never own one myself. The S2000 is even borderline too slow for my tastes. For me, no amount of handling can make up for the lack of straight-line power of the Miata.
Originally Posted by 124Spider,Feb 24 2011, 06:31 PM
Ah, the aggressive ignorance continues apace....
But to trot out tripe like or takes aggressive ignorance to a new level.
Not that that surprises me any more around here.
But to trot out tripe like or takes aggressive ignorance to a new level.
Not that that surprises me any more around here.
Or, are you disputing the higher risk of financial loss in the event of a crash?
Last I checked, you don't own a race prepped s2k. Why isn't it? Oh wait, you drive a spec miata.
Originally Posted by psychoazn,Feb 24 2011, 07:52 PM
Are you disputing my higher cost of entry statement?
Or, are you disputing the higher risk of financial loss in the event of a crash?
Last I checked, you don't own a race prepped s2k. Why isn't it? Oh wait, you drive a spec miata.
Or, are you disputing the higher risk of financial loss in the event of a crash?
Last I checked, you don't own a race prepped s2k. Why isn't it? Oh wait, you drive a spec miata.
Your absurdly simplistic statement was both factually wrong, and incomplete. Par for the course in the fanboi world, unfortunately.
A jalopy of a Spec Miata will cost you $7000 even in this economy; my son sold his rolled-over wreck for $6500. A decent Spec Miata will cost $10,000. A front-runner can cost as much as $25,000. Your figures for buying a Spec Miata were utterly silly; you would have a difficult time buying a decent donor car (the basic Miata, without any race prep) for $2000, and that would only be the very earliest ones. It would be good to check your "facts" before spouting them.
But the real reason Spec Miata is the most popular SCCA class is because it's some of the best racing SCCA has to offer. The cars are quite equal, so it very much comes down to driving and setup skill. And, regardless of where you are in the grid, because the grids tend to be very large, you likely will have one or more cars to play with for the entire race. Don't expect to spend 30 minutes playing tag with another car when you race your S2000. If you ever race your S2000.
As much as I love my S2000, as much as I like autocrossing it, and as much as I loved tracking it, the first time I drove a Spec Miata on the track, I was hooked; it was so much more fun than the S2000,
I love my s2k. I don't want to track it hard because its expensive LOL. I don't wanna break it.
I could easily see myself buying and tracking a miata in the future. I really like the car, and like others said...The racing/track community is huge for them. Consumables are way cheaper. 15 inch wheel vs 17 inch wheel, ect
I could easily see myself buying and tracking a miata in the future. I really like the car, and like others said...The racing/track community is huge for them. Consumables are way cheaper. 15 inch wheel vs 17 inch wheel, ect







