HAHHAHAHAHAH -20whp from taking your lid off. hahahhahahahahah

Here's mine bone stock.
Runs #1,2,3 have the lid ON.
Run #4 in the red is with the lid OFF.

Your car is retarded.

 

Numbers are numbers.

There wasn't a fan blowing into the engine during any of the runs so that may be it.

 

and it looks like it was way hotter and (probably) more humid too.

 

doesn1t that show a loss of 1 hp after the krankvents?

 

You know its almost pointless to post dyno numbers on internet. If the numbers arn't in people's favor they just scream BS the whole time. The tree huggers are pissed that my catless dyno brought me from 198 to 215 so they just call BS in hopes of people to stop people going catless.

We have a dyno with the lid of the airbox off SHOWING extreme powerloss but now all the people who run with the box off call BS because their cars are now slow then stock

Why even bother posting numbers, some people have to much ego these days.

 

It does...it's a loss all the way at the very very last peak which is right after a power dip anyways. On average the krankvents are giving 1-2whp gain all through-out the powerband.

 

Other people's opinions on my #'s could mean less to me. I'm just here to share what I found.

I would go catless, but I have my resonator cut out.

Test pipe + resonatorectomy = Bee's in a can

 

Bonnet shut or open with lid off?

 

Damn...those are pretty good numbers. I have a stock 350z that has BHP of 300.
...here are my dyno results.



not nearly as good.

 

Without including IAT sensor readings and coolant temps these dyno sheets are completely worthless. Especially since you are "testing" modifications which would be sensitive to these conditions. By posting these dyno sheets with "conclusions" you are doing nothing other than creating pure speculation and spreading mis-information.

You must normalize the test environment or have some scale with which to apply a correction factor.