S2000 Talk Discussions related to the S2000, its ownership and enthusiasm for it.

My AP2 Dynos

Thread Tools
 
Old Aug 8, 2006 | 03:50 PM
  #21  
ArinX's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 418
Likes: 0
From: SoCal
Default

Originally Posted by harshfury,Aug 8 2006, 02:48 PM
Damn...those are pretty good numbers. I have a stock 350z that has BHP of 300.
...here are my dyno results.



not nearly as good.
LOL! dead
Reply
Old Aug 8, 2006 | 04:00 PM
  #22  
mugenrsx's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 904
Likes: 0
From: Conway, AR
Default

Originally Posted by Si2k,Aug 8 2006, 03:12 PM
Bonnet shut or open with lid off?
The hood was open during all runs.
Reply
Old Aug 8, 2006 | 05:51 PM
  #23  
jaws's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 159
Likes: 0
From: Edmonton
Default

Originally Posted by harshfury,Aug 8 2006, 02:48 PM
Damn...those are pretty good numbers. I have a stock 350z that has BHP of 300.
...here are my dyno results.



not nearly as good.
Looks kind of phallic to me...
Reply
Old Aug 8, 2006 | 06:05 PM
  #24  
Spec_Ops2087's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 10,301
Likes: 18
From: New Jersey
Default

Originally Posted by jaws,Aug 8 2006, 08:51 PM
Looks kind of phallic to me...
haha is that real? I don't think I see a dyno chart
Reply
Old Aug 9, 2006 | 09:42 AM
  #25  
Wisconsin S2k's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 9,792
Likes: 5
From: Milwaukee Area
Default

Originally Posted by Spec_Ops2087,Aug 8 2006, 07:08 AM
You know its almost pointless to post dyno numbers on internet. If the numbers arn't in people's favor they just scream BS the whole time. The tree huggers are pissed that my catless dyno brought me from 198 to 215 so they just call BS in hopes of people to stop people going catless.

We have a dyno with the lid of the airbox off SHOWING extreme powerloss but now all the people who run with the box off call BS because their cars are now slow then stock

Why even bother posting numbers, some people have to much ego these days.
A big part of the problem is that people are posting dynos with smaller differences in gains or losses. And when they do this, they don't provide nor most often, even measure the other important factors.

When dyno'ing such small differences, you MUST:

A. dyno 4-5 times before AND after. take the highest reading. this eliminates the 5% dyno error factor or at least minimizes it.

B. take measurements of EVERYTHING! ambient air temp. intake air temp. timing mapping. air/fuel ratios. coolant temp. oil temp. all of those things can affect the numbers you get. if you dont measure all of those on EACH RUN and post them with your results so they can be taken into consideration, then your results aren't valid.
Reply
Old Aug 9, 2006 | 09:45 AM
  #26  
Wisconsin S2k's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 9,792
Likes: 5
From: Milwaukee Area
Default

Originally Posted by jerrypeterson,Aug 8 2006, 05:37 PM
Without including IAT sensor readings and coolant temps these dyno sheets are completely worthless. Especially since you are "testing" modifications which would be sensitive to these conditions. By posting these dyno sheets with "conclusions" you are doing nothing other than creating pure speculation and spreading mis-information.

You must normalize the test environment or have some scale with which to apply a correction factor.
EXACTLY!!!! this smart man here beat me to the punch.
Reply
Old Aug 9, 2006 | 09:56 AM
  #27  
s2kshift9k's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 8,367
Likes: 0
From: Albuquerque, NM
Default

ya you can see when he was spraying but looks like he had to shut it down
Reply
Old Aug 9, 2006 | 10:06 AM
  #28  
sirploppy's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Default

From the look of that Dyno... Premature spraying???

Reply




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:33 PM.