S2000 Talk Discussions related to the S2000, its ownership and enthusiasm for it.

NA or FORCE INDUCTION? why?

Thread Tools
 
Old Aug 9, 2006 | 02:15 AM
  #1  
kfdon's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 351
Likes: 0
Default NA or FORCE INDUCTION? why?

what would or did your guys do to you s2k?
NA??? FORCE INDUCTION??
and why?

i'm in NA right now, thinking if i should add a SC haha

any opinions?
Reply
Old Aug 9, 2006 | 02:46 AM
  #2  
Emil St-Hilaire's Avatar
Gold Member (Premium)
Active Streak: 30 Days
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 22,662
Likes: 490
From: St-Redempteur,Qc.
Default

Why not???
Reply
Old Aug 9, 2006 | 03:05 AM
  #3  
Lionheart's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 934
Likes: 0
From: LittlecountrynamedBelgium
Default

SC = more power then NA
Reply
Old Aug 9, 2006 | 03:35 AM
  #4  
Erick S's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 934
Likes: 0
From: Miami....
Default




I don't know anything about NA. I will tell you that FI is alot of money AND alot of fun. I would prefer to FI for the results it produces..

Erick
Reply
Old Aug 9, 2006 | 03:45 AM
  #5  
Ks320's Avatar
Registered User
Gold Member (Premium)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 5,252
Likes: 1
From: Hong Kong
Default

IF NA could produce the same amount of power and torque, then definitely NA! Less hassle and more direct response.
Reply
Old Aug 9, 2006 | 04:16 AM
  #6  
GPW03's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,829
Likes: 0
From: Canada
Default

Mild N/A for me, cause I can't afford to go FI. FI can provide a lot more power, but it also requires more $$. Mind you a killer N/A setup could cost just as much.
Reply
Old Aug 9, 2006 | 04:23 AM
  #7  
Poindexter's Avatar
Former Moderator
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 24,162
Likes: 3
From: Burlington, VT
Default

My mechanic has a saying: if you want a faster car, buy a faster car.

I didn't buy into it until I watched two S2000 friends barely have their cars running over the past year because something always broke when they drove. Yes, they took their super chargers to higher levels. Now they're going totally different routes, but by the time they're done they could have paid cash for a much faster car, and never had to worry about the "fun" car being down.
Reply
Old Aug 9, 2006 | 04:29 AM
  #8  
nnkfws333's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 278
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Poindexter,Aug 9 2006, 04:23 AM
My mechanic has a saying: if you want a faster car, buy a faster car.

I didn't buy into it until I watched two S2000 friends barely have their cars running over the past year because something always broke when they drove. Yes, they took their super chargers to higher levels. Now they're going totally different routes, but by the time they're done they could have paid cash for a much faster car, and never had to worry about the "fun" car being down.
Very true but sometimes its more of a satisfaction to do things on your own. Also sometimes more expensive faster cars can be fugly and sometimes not. I know I would rather have a S2k than a Corvette. But also I would love a M3 over a S2k.
Reply
Old Aug 9, 2006 | 04:50 AM
  #9  
Poindexter's Avatar
Former Moderator
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 24,162
Likes: 3
From: Burlington, VT
Default

Originally Posted by nnkfws333,Aug 9 2006, 07:29 AM
But also I would love a M3 over a S2k.
Did you happen to notice my obnoxiously loud signature?
Reply
Old Aug 9, 2006 | 05:16 AM
  #10  
Emil St-Hilaire's Avatar
Gold Member (Premium)
Active Streak: 30 Days
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 22,662
Likes: 490
From: St-Redempteur,Qc.
Default

Speed cost money;how fast do you want to go???
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:18 AM.