Official 2004 S2000 Specs by VTEC.net
Originally posted by Road Rage
It is a stroker by all accounts - and you are correct on all points. Strokers usually have less revs because the psiton wobble becomes more of an issue as the conn rod becomes longer. We are all still guessing, but it is fun nonetheless.
It is a stroker by all accounts - and you are correct on all points. Strokers usually have less revs because the psiton wobble becomes more of an issue as the conn rod becomes longer. We are all still guessing, but it is fun nonetheless.
280hp, ha, who actually believed that.
Originally posted by trendy26
Is the redline gonna still be 9000 RPM????
Is the redline gonna still be 9000 RPM????
Hm, so knowing the numbers we do now about power, torque, and gearing and assuming a stroked engine.... what's the general feeling about how this will affect, say, performance for autocross? Of course the suspension changes will have a lot to do with it as well, but there's no way of knowing right now if that'll be better or worse (in terms of absolute handling).
Matt
Matt
As much as I admire Honda products, I would guess that their focus will be on the bottom line. It seems to me that most of the suspected changes are to accommodate the majority of "average" drivers.
Perfect examples of this would be:
Freshened interior design with improved shoulder and elbow room
Improved console with two cup holders and storage tray
Seat Belt Reminder System added
And also with the motor changes. How many "average" drivers really push it to 9000RPM? How may of them are comparing the S2000 to other roadsters with more torque and HP?
Suspension changes, how many "average" drivers do not like the feel of the S2000?
Even the exterior changes seem like they are to cater to the "average" driver that will be comparing the vehicle to Honda's competition line-ups.
Again, Honda is in the business of selling vehicles, if they can make some changes to increase their sales to the "average" driver that is looking at purchasing a roadster, then they will most likely do it to remain competitive. They most likely will not try to only please the auto-x'er or track guru, they aren't the majority of consumers.
Personally, I prefer the current design of the vehicle and it suits my wants perfectly, but many others that have ridden with me commonly make comments like "There's only one cup holder?" or "It feels like it rides kind of rough on the road."
Perfect examples of this would be:
Freshened interior design with improved shoulder and elbow room
Improved console with two cup holders and storage tray
Seat Belt Reminder System added
And also with the motor changes. How many "average" drivers really push it to 9000RPM? How may of them are comparing the S2000 to other roadsters with more torque and HP?
Suspension changes, how many "average" drivers do not like the feel of the S2000?
Even the exterior changes seem like they are to cater to the "average" driver that will be comparing the vehicle to Honda's competition line-ups.
Again, Honda is in the business of selling vehicles, if they can make some changes to increase their sales to the "average" driver that is looking at purchasing a roadster, then they will most likely do it to remain competitive. They most likely will not try to only please the auto-x'er or track guru, they aren't the majority of consumers.
Personally, I prefer the current design of the vehicle and it suits my wants perfectly, but many others that have ridden with me commonly make comments like "There's only one cup holder?" or "It feels like it rides kind of rough on the road."
The new engine has a 1200 rpm gap between peak torque and HP, whereas the old one had a 600rpm gap. This may imply that the new engine has a wider, flatter torque curve (as well as higher). If so, the new engine would not only have more torque, but it would have it over a larger range of engine speeds. I would think this would be an advantage in autocross.
As usual, this is pure speculation.
As usual, this is pure speculation.



