S2000 Talk Discussions related to the S2000, its ownership and enthusiasm for it.

Official 2004 S2000 Specs by VTEC.net

Thread Tools
 
Old Sep 2, 2003 | 01:51 PM
  #31  
PMantis24's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,806
Likes: 0
From: NYC
Default

Originally posted by Road Rage
It is a stroker by all accounts - and you are correct on all points. Strokers usually have less revs because the psiton wobble becomes more of an issue as the conn rod becomes longer. We are all still guessing, but it is fun nonetheless.
At least now the guesses are educational and the discussions technical. Whereas before people were just throwing out nonsense. things are coming together now. Honda should have official word and pics soon. If I remember someone said middle of sept.

280hp, ha, who actually believed that.
Reply
Old Sep 2, 2003 | 01:55 PM
  #32  
3ngin33r1's Avatar
Registered User
Gold Member (Premium)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 16,231
Likes: 2
From: Kingston, WA
Default

I never believe anything until I can drive it.
Reply
Old Sep 2, 2003 | 02:12 PM
  #33  
trendy26's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 539
Likes: 0
From: FL
Default

Is the redline gonna still be 9000 RPM????
Reply
Old Sep 2, 2003 | 02:19 PM
  #34  
Road Rage's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 3,660
Likes: 2
From: Midlothian
Default

Originally posted by trendy26
Is the redline gonna still be 9000 RPM????
My guess is NO - but also ask me if i care (hint: I don't). Heck, I would be happy if they torqued it up so you could short shift it (JK).
Reply
Old Sep 2, 2003 | 02:23 PM
  #35  
xmatt's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 815
Likes: 0
From: Dallas
Default

Hm, so knowing the numbers we do now about power, torque, and gearing and assuming a stroked engine.... what's the general feeling about how this will affect, say, performance for autocross? Of course the suspension changes will have a lot to do with it as well, but there's no way of knowing right now if that'll be better or worse (in terms of absolute handling).

Matt
Reply
Old Sep 2, 2003 | 02:41 PM
  #36  
3ngin33r1's Avatar
Registered User
Gold Member (Premium)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 16,231
Likes: 2
From: Kingston, WA
Default

As much as I admire Honda products, I would guess that their focus will be on the bottom line. It seems to me that most of the suspected changes are to accommodate the majority of "average" drivers.

Perfect examples of this would be:
Freshened interior design with improved shoulder and elbow room
Improved console with two cup holders and storage tray
Seat Belt Reminder System added

And also with the motor changes. How many "average" drivers really push it to 9000RPM? How may of them are comparing the S2000 to other roadsters with more torque and HP?

Suspension changes, how many "average" drivers do not like the feel of the S2000?

Even the exterior changes seem like they are to cater to the "average" driver that will be comparing the vehicle to Honda's competition line-ups.

Again, Honda is in the business of selling vehicles, if they can make some changes to increase their sales to the "average" driver that is looking at purchasing a roadster, then they will most likely do it to remain competitive. They most likely will not try to only please the auto-x'er or track guru, they aren't the majority of consumers.

Personally, I prefer the current design of the vehicle and it suits my wants perfectly, but many others that have ridden with me commonly make comments like "There's only one cup holder?" or "It feels like it rides kind of rough on the road."
Reply
Old Sep 2, 2003 | 02:44 PM
  #37  
zeraful's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 171
Likes: 0
From: houston
Default

is this spec final? or is it not certain yet? @_@ i hope its not.... with this new spec.. it really does seem that the car is watered down.
Reply
Old Sep 2, 2003 | 02:45 PM
  #38  
smiler's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh
Default

The new engine has a 1200 rpm gap between peak torque and HP, whereas the old one had a 600rpm gap. This may imply that the new engine has a wider, flatter torque curve (as well as higher). If so, the new engine would not only have more torque, but it would have it over a larger range of engine speeds. I would think this would be an advantage in autocross.

As usual, this is pure speculation.
Reply
Old Sep 2, 2003 | 02:49 PM
  #39  
zeraful's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 171
Likes: 0
From: houston
Default

[QUOTE]Originally posted by S2K@PR
[B]S2000
Reply
Old Sep 2, 2003 | 02:56 PM
  #40  
3ngin33r1's Avatar
Registered User
Gold Member (Premium)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 16,231
Likes: 2
From: Kingston, WA
Default

The only enhancement that I think would be worth it (but it's not on the list) is seat heaters.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:08 PM.