S2000 Talk Discussions related to the S2000, its ownership and enthusiasm for it.

Revised instrument cluster for 2003

Thread Tools
 
Old Apr 22, 2002 | 05:44 PM
  #1  
Silver Bullet's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 821
Likes: 0
From: Tracy
Default

With the recent discussion on what changes we'd like to see for 2003 (2003 Wish List), I had commented on some changes that I'd like to see on the instrument cluster/gauge package. Here's a visual representation of what I meant. I found a photo of the gauge cluster on Temple of VTEC and started with that.

Here's the original:


And here's my idea:


The second photo includes the following changes:
1) moved the "x1000r/min" label next to the "10" on the tach
2) moved all of the idiot lights to a single area
3) moved the fuel gauge to the left under the water temp gauge
4) added an oil temp gauge where the fuel gauge used to be
5) added an oil pressure gauge under the oil temp gauge
6) moved the "pictographs" for each gauge to the outside for better visibility
7) changed all bar graphs to use smaller segments for better accuracy

I also just noticed that the fuel gauge shouldn't have a red area near the "full" mark. My bad.

The oil pressure gauge should also include a red area for low pressure readings.
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2002 | 05:58 PM
  #2  
Eze8199's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,094
Likes: 0
From: Long Island
Default

For the most part, i like it.
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2002 | 06:49 PM
  #3  
Shinji's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 1,985
Likes: 0
Default

A little too clustered...IMO
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2002 | 06:57 PM
  #4  
simon2000's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 496
Likes: 0
From: Unfortunately TOR
Default

nice.. now buy a plane ticket, and go to Japan and present it there and get back to us ?


-simon2000
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2002 | 07:00 PM
  #5  
SkipX's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 329
Likes: 1
From: Raleigh
Default

I would prefer LED digits instead of bars. It is about precision?

Reply
Old Apr 22, 2002 | 07:32 PM
  #6  
Speedracer's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 1,244
Likes: 0
From: SoCal
Default

I like the way it is right now
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2002 | 09:09 PM
  #7  
stockae92's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 6,006
Likes: 0
From: socal
Default

i like the idea of giving more info (oil temp and pressure gauages) to the driver ...

but do we need 10k rpm on the cluster when our engine is not suppose to rev that high?
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2002 | 01:36 PM
  #8  
Silver Bullet's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 821
Likes: 0
From: Tracy
Default

Originally posted by stockae92
i like the idea of giving more info (oil temp and pressure gauages) to the driver ...

but do we need 10k rpm on the cluster when our engine is not suppose to rev that high?
The 10K rpm on the tach was part of the original image that I found. I'm guessing that it was from an early pre-production car or possibly the SSM? I couldn't find a more accurate (or current) picture of the gauge cluster.


Originally posted by SkipX
I would prefer LED digits instead of bars. It is about precision?
True, numeric representation would be more accurate than a bar graph, however, that would require you to actually read the numbers. The bar graphs could just be glanced at to get an idea of the oil temp and pressure. I was just thinking that the bar graphs were a digital representation of standard analog gauges and I think there's enough segments in the graphs to provide the necessary accuracy.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Chugs
S2000 Racing and Competition
30
Aug 15, 2016 03:00 AM
boyguan
S2000 Modifications and Parts
9
May 3, 2013 03:10 PM
raymo19
S2000 Vintage Owners
5
Apr 24, 2008 04:38 PM
Silver9k
S2000 Talk
11
Sep 8, 2005 11:21 AM
craigjcoil
S2000 Under The Hood
0
Aug 9, 2004 10:19 AM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:47 AM.