S2000 Talk Discussions related to the S2000, its ownership and enthusiasm for it.

S2000 Help...

Thread Tools
 
Old May 25, 2005 | 03:05 AM
  #1  
psyke14's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
From: New Jersey
Default S2000 Help...

I'm in the process of the selecting an s2000 within the next few days. I did my research and what not but i wanted personal feedback from other people whether i should get the f20 or f22....this is my first car with future plans of autocross and track..
Reply
Old May 25, 2005 | 03:09 AM
  #2  
toosteeley's Avatar
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 10,330
Likes: 0
From: toronto
Default

Tons of info on this. You're not the first to ask...

https://www.s2ki.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=154011
Reply
Old May 25, 2005 | 06:21 AM
  #3  
Incubus's Avatar
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 5,729
Likes: 2
Default

I have F22C now, and miss the F20C because I find myself running out of RPM. If I had never owned a car with a higher redline, then I believe I'd be 100% happy with this car. Now I'm only 99% happy.

If it's your first, then get the F22, it's easier to drive around town (especially on hot days).
Reply
Old May 25, 2005 | 07:31 AM
  #4  
Triple-H's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 58,680
Likes: 2
From: West Henrietta UPSTATE NY
Default

F20C all the way!!!

The small little increase in torque with the F22C is to me not worth the loss of an extra 1,000 rpms up top. Staying between 6,000 rpms and 8,000 rpms is a lot trickier than staying between 6,000 and 9,000 on the track.

I love my 2002 and I would greatly miss the 9,000 shift points with a F22C.

I suspect this thread could get a little hot, me thinks you need to just go drive both and decide for yourself.
Reply
Old May 25, 2005 | 08:02 AM
  #5  
Incubus's Avatar
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 5,729
Likes: 2
Default

Originally Posted by Triple-H,May 25 2005, 03:31 PM
F20C all the way!!!

The small little increase in torque with the F22C is to me not worth the loss of an extra 1,000 rpms up top. Staying between 6,000 rpms and 8,000 rpms is a lot trickier than staying between 6,000 and 9,000 on the track.

I love my 2002 and I would greatly miss the 9,000 shift points with a F22C.

I suspect this thread could get a little hot, me thinks you need to just go drive both and decide for yourself.
That's what I was saying, I find myself running out of revs...but if I had never owned the F20C, then it would be a different story.
Reply
Old May 25, 2005 | 04:48 PM
  #6  
psyke14's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
From: New Jersey
Default

i'm seriously leaning for the f20c because of that extra 1k rpm up top...its lovely to hear half of an f1 car...i remember reading somewhere that the f20c had better steering response than f22c
Reply
Old May 25, 2005 | 05:12 PM
  #7  
deathsled's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,189
Likes: 0
From: Raleigh, NC
Default

04 or 05 car with 00/01 ECU

9000rpm problem solved, more power all around than a normal f22c or a f20c
Reply

Trending Topics

Old May 25, 2005 | 05:19 PM
  #8  
pantyraider's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 2,202
Likes: 1
From: San Fran
Default

Originally Posted by deathsled,May 25 2005, 06:12 PM
04 or 05 car with 00/01 ECU

9000rpm problem solved, more power all around than a normal f22c or a f20c
Reply
Old May 26, 2005 | 03:06 PM
  #9  
psyke14's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
From: New Jersey
Default

eh?...never heard the ecu swap like that before...
Reply
Old May 26, 2005 | 03:25 PM
  #10  
rmc22's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 441
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by psyke14,May 26 2005, 03:06 PM
eh?...never heard the ecu swap like that before...
Not a good swap. Searching this site alone will provide enough evidence that engine longevity is thrown at the window. Of course you don't always have to shift at 9k.

IMO, I went with the 04 because I couldn't find a left over 03 at the time. Having only driven to 9k on limited occasions, I don't miss what I don't have. Since neither is faster, the extra 1k is a gimmick to me like the start button, so I'll take the 10% increase in displacement. It's a question of 8900 rpm vs 8200.

The body revisions were also a big plus for me.

All things equal, Best Motoring found the improvements of the 04 to be quicker than the previous on the track. They were running the same motor.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Genimo
S2000 Racing and Competition
25
Sep 21, 2015 07:31 AM
kylekim
S2000 Racing and Competition
13
Sep 26, 2005 09:05 PM
RoBD305
S2000 Talk
7
Apr 17, 2003 06:59 PM
ganstahype
S2000 Talk
4
Apr 11, 2003 06:45 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:38 PM.