S2000 Talk Discussions related to the S2000, its ownership and enthusiasm for it.

S2000 a mid-engine car?

Thread Tools
 
Old Jan 19, 2004 | 09:07 PM
  #41  
3ngin33r1's Avatar
Registered User
Gold Member (Premium)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 16,231
Likes: 2
From: Kingston, WA
Default

Well, good thing the S2000 isn't 50/50. It's 49/51.
Reply
Old Jan 19, 2004 | 09:08 PM
  #42  
cfusionpm's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,210
Likes: 0
From: San Diego
Default



lol
Reply
Old Jan 19, 2004 | 10:00 PM
  #43  
Hyper-X's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,987
Likes: 0
From: Hawaii
Default

I've seen some guys with big guts who drive their S2000's, and I'm sure the weight distribution is more like 55/45 with them. 58/42 after finishing a party ball maybe.
Reply
Old Jan 19, 2004 | 10:15 PM
  #44  
dbw's Avatar
dbw
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,116
Likes: 0
From: palo alto
Default

ok...help me out on this....how about some definitions for the cars below??

1903-08 cadillac...engine dead nuts in between the axles..[right under the driver]

1909-27 ford model t....engine well behind the front axle...

1924-30 bugatti t-35...[.same as above]

1965 lotus super seven..[same as above]

1958 porsche 356...engine completely behind rear axle...

1968 porsche 911 [as above]..

1958 panhard...engine in front of front axle....

1956 porsche 550...engine in front of rear axle

196? oldsmobile toronado...engine directly above front axle....

198?delorean..engine directly above rear axle....

indy stp turbine car....engine next to driver between axles....

if you can answer the above then you can make the call on a s2000.

Reply
Old Jan 19, 2004 | 10:55 PM
  #45  
RedondoS2K's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 221
Likes: 0
From: Redondo Beach
Default

[QUOTE]Originally posted by xmatt
...
For the record, I think that most people would agree that "mid-engine" means behind the cockpit, in front of the rear axle.
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2004 | 12:41 AM
  #46  
simons2k's Avatar
Thread Starter
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 3,397
Likes: 3
From: High Point, NC
Default

Well there it is. The S2000 is a mid engine car. A front mid engine to be exact. Not to be confused with the traditional rear mid engine cars that most people are more familiar with.

Anyone dizzy yet?
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2004 | 12:49 AM
  #47  
simons2k's Avatar
Thread Starter
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 3,397
Likes: 3
From: High Point, NC
Default

Originally posted by Russian
Guys cmon, open up your hoods. If you see an enigne, you are looking at a front-engine car.
I decided to open my hood tonight. Guess what I found? An engine mounted behind the front axle telling me it's a mid engine car.

I think the post describing the Mercedes SLR's engine layout gives my thinking more credibility.
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2004 | 01:01 AM
  #48  
simons2k's Avatar
Thread Starter
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 3,397
Likes: 3
From: High Point, NC
Default

[QUOTE]Originally posted by cfusionpm
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2004 | 06:52 AM
  #49  
Russian's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 772
Likes: 0
From: Boston
Default

The basic reason why 50-50 is ideal is because during acceleration you want as much of the cars weight over the rear tires as possible. (we're talking rear wheel drive only here). And during braking you want as much of the weight over the fronts to give better traction while taking a turn.
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2004 | 07:07 AM
  #50  
S2kRob's Avatar
25 Year Member
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 7,414
Likes: 0
From: Toronto
Default

Masserati is saying 45/55 is actually the ideal weight distribution. The front engined Quattroporte actually has more weight on the rear wheels than the front. (Technically it's a mid-engined sedan).
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:05 AM.