S2000 Talk Discussions related to the S2000, its ownership and enthusiasm for it.

s2000 spin out

Thread Tools
 
Old Oct 14, 2010 | 04:38 PM
  #61  
tarheel91's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 862
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by dammitjim,Oct 14 2010, 06:07 PM
citation needed

Seriously, wtf are you talking about. Muscle cars sat on fat grippy tires? Troll post smells like troll.
A fat tire = a wider contact patch that's less long. Without going too in depth, it allows for more total grip vs. a skinnier tire of a similar compound (because of a more uniform distribution of force over the contact patch) but less warning as to when you've reached the limit. It has to do with slip angles and the way a fat tire reaches maximum lateral acceleration vs. a skinny tire, but it's hard to explain in a few paragraphs.

Muscle cars are associated with straight line speed, drag strips, etc. Any car set up for this type of thing featured wider tires and had the same issues with "snap oversteer" as an S2000 did. Granted, it generally wasn't as bad because of other factors that worked against this (softer suspension, higher ride heights, etc.). Seriously, "snap oversteer" is not something that only happens in an S2000. My dad's owned countless 60's Corvettes (along with many other muscle cars) and he laughed at the idea of the S2000 stepping out quick. He told me I didn't know what snap was. It occurs for a variety of reasons (wide tires, an effort to get a "responsive" car, a natural tendency for oversteer due to the suspension set up) and there are far worse examples of it than the S2000. Judging from the reviews and videos I've seen, the ZR1 features a really fine line between fast and spun. The Z4 M is supposed to behave similarly. Really, any car that's described as difficult to drive at the limit but still features great lap times when driven by a great driver is probably going to behave this way. It's a feature of RWD cars that is amplified by how the car's set up.
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2010 | 05:00 PM
  #62  
Jacksparrow's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 421
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by st4rk,Oct 14 2010, 01:37 PM
Like the faster rx7.
Yea faster to blow its engine
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2010 | 05:01 PM
  #63  
dammitjim's Avatar
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 2,824
Likes: 18
From: WI
Default

[QUOTE=tarheel91,Oct 14 2010, 07:38 PM] A fat tire = a wider contact patch that's less long.
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2010 | 05:05 PM
  #64  
Steponme's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 2,825
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by dammitjim,Oct 14 2010, 02:07 PM
Troll post smells like troll.
I feel this term is often overused by ignoramuses, who don't really know its meaning. How is he a troll if he's been here longer than you and talking about the subject at hand?

I hate idiots (including wraithfag/five) who use terms they often don't understand their meanings.
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2010 | 05:10 PM
  #65  
Steponme's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 2,825
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by st4rk,Oct 14 2010, 01:37 PM
Like the faster rx7.
Tomato, tomahto. Both cars usually can trap 100mph and gets high 13s in the 1/4mi.

The Boxster and RX8 are some examples of RWD cars that are less "tail-happy"; other heavier examples include Supra, M3, etc. Hell, even the NSX was more planted in the rear than S2000.
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2010 | 05:14 PM
  #66  
s2cho's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,944
Likes: 7
Default

Originally Posted by hariku821,Oct 13 2010, 09:08 PM
Seriously? FWD and RWD are two different worlds.


You should know that controlling a RWD car vs a fwd car is a totally different story and if not you should have at least looked it up, especially before making this post.



Were your tires bald? Were you going to fast? If these do not apply your just an idiot.
yea my tires were all bald, and it was a road where theres no lights... but eh
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2010 | 05:15 PM
  #67  
s2cho's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,944
Likes: 7
Default

Originally Posted by Slithr,Oct 14 2010, 09:45 AM
Have no idea of the troll status of the original poster, but it sounds like he had the choice of staying on the brakes or hitting someone. He chose to stay on the brakes. Apparently he was surprised by the fact that the car rotated. So either he hasn't driven a car (FWD or RWD) that close to the edge before or the handling characteristics of the s2k caught him out. Counter steering may have saved him or he may have just run out of room. Stuff happens.
i think the s2k's handing messed me up cause its so much sharper than other imports...
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2010 | 05:15 PM
  #68  
s2cho's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,944
Likes: 7
Default

Originally Posted by al4t1gbundy,Oct 14 2010, 09:56 AM
Hey sorry to cut you off OP, but I had to get over to the right lane. My exit was coming up and you were in the middle of not going fast enough and going too fast for me to pass safely.

Next time please stop thumping that raver music too. It kills the trees.
lol i wasnt even listening to music hahaha, and im pretty sure it wasnt you
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2010 | 05:16 PM
  #69  
s2cho's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,944
Likes: 7
Default

Originally Posted by tarheel91,Oct 14 2010, 04:38 PM
A fat tire = a wider contact patch that's less long. Without going too in depth, it allows for more total grip vs. a skinnier tire of a similar compound (because of a more uniform distribution of force over the contact patch) but less warning as to when you've reached the limit. It has to do with slip angles and the way a fat tire reaches maximum lateral acceleration vs. a skinny tire, but it's hard to explain in a few paragraphs.

Muscle cars are associated with straight line speed, drag strips, etc. Any car set up for this type of thing featured wider tires and had the same issues with "snap oversteer" as an S2000 did. Granted, it generally wasn't as bad because of other factors that worked against this (softer suspension, higher ride heights, etc.). Seriously, "snap oversteer" is not something that only happens in an S2000. My dad's owned countless 60's Corvettes (along with many other muscle cars) and he laughed at the idea of the S2000 stepping out quick. He told me I didn't know what snap was. It occurs for a variety of reasons (wide tires, an effort to get a "responsive" car, a natural tendency for oversteer due to the suspension set up) and there are far worse examples of it than the S2000. Judging from the reviews and videos I've seen, the ZR1 features a really fine line between fast and spun. The Z4 M is supposed to behave similarly. Really, any car that's described as difficult to drive at the limit but still features great lap times when driven by a great driver is probably going to behave this way. It's a feature of RWD cars that is amplified by how the car's set up.
so do you think if i had wider tires i wouldnt spin out like that?
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2010 | 05:40 PM
  #70  
S2KN05's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,730
Likes: 1
From: San Jose
Default

Originally Posted by s2cho,Oct 14 2010, 06:14 PM
yea my tires were all bald, and it was a road where theres no lights... but eh
ding ding ding. We have a winner.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:59 PM.