S2000 Talk Discussions related to the S2000, its ownership and enthusiasm for it.

S2000 Vs. BMW 135 Convertible

Thread Tools
 
Old Nov 4, 2007 | 08:08 AM
  #51  
AP1FTW's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,468
Likes: 0
From: Edmonton Alberta
Default

Originally Posted by nastinupe1,Nov 4 2007, 08:40 AM
You're right, however, I believe that when you measure a car's performance, you have to look at several factors

1) Quickness (1/4 times)
2) Power (power/ weight ratio)
3) Manuverability (slalom)
4) Speed (top speed)

I think that courses like Laguna is a good place to test a car's blend of all of these things. It's a good mixture of turns straight aways, elevation changes, etc. It really tests what a car is made of.

I have never driven on the course, however, in GT, it was the most challenging course and I used to use it to test new cars that I would make for myself to see if they were up to par with previous creations.

I believe that the key here is balance, which is what the 135 seems to 'MAYBE" have.

My main question is whether or not the 135 will beat the S2000 in #3 on my list?
that is very true.....i just think the S2K is a more balanced and composed car compared to its class.......take the 350Z for instance, sure i can go fast in a straight line but when u come up to a turn it feels like tehre is no connection to the road, and it rolls quite a bit....so its not like im saying that the 335i is a bad car i just dont think its a sports car......but i guess thats what the M3 is for hahaha


IMO S2K is the best bang for buck....
Reply
Old Nov 4, 2007 | 02:39 PM
  #52  
bankstreet's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 136
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by AP1FTW,Nov 3 2007, 08:48 PM
i wouldnt classify killing as being .400 seconds faster with more power and double the torque.....clearly the 335i cant handle for shit....
I'm not sure what 0.4 sec you are talking about but I was talking about the lap time....1:50.7 for the S2000 and 1:49.0 for the 335i
Reply
Old Nov 4, 2007 | 03:10 PM
  #53  
AP1FTW's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,468
Likes: 0
From: Edmonton Alberta
Default

Originally Posted by bankstreet,Nov 4 2007, 05:39 PM
I'm not sure what 0.4 sec you are talking about but I was talking about the lap time....1:50.7 for the S2000 and 1:49.0 for the 335i
w.e it was it wasnt killing it....especially since in a straight line the 335i would kill the S2K.......did u even look at the other performance figures othere than the lap time......the S2K pulls waaaaaaaaay more G.....i was just stating with way less focus on power and more focus on balance the S2K is a better all around car than the 335i.....
Reply
Old Nov 4, 2007 | 06:05 PM
  #54  
CA_S2K's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,940
Likes: 1
From: So Cal
Default

wow i drove my buddy's 335i and it is alot faster than my s2000 but the handling was shit compared to the s2k. One night we decided to race from a stop he took me then we did it again but this time he had a full car, smoked his ass, just tought i would input some info that no one cares about
Reply
Old Nov 4, 2007 | 07:13 PM
  #55  
Shazzam's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
From: Santa Clarita, CA
Default

The styling reminds me of a Tiburon. What's with the wavy body lines?
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
///M Powered
Car and Bike Talk
10
Jul 6, 2002 03:49 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:19 PM.