S2000 Talk Discussions related to the S2000, its ownership and enthusiasm for it.

S2000 vs Boxster

Thread Tools
 
Old Jun 29, 2011 | 10:42 AM
  #51  
RedCelica's Avatar
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 15,342
Likes: 103
From: Raleigh
Default

Originally Posted by CKit
Originally Posted by datdude1119' timestamp='1309298353' post='20728770
[quote name='CKit' timestamp='1309260116' post='20726477']
So what, plenty of women drive Corvettes, Miatas and Minis. Doesn't make them any less capable or fun as performance vehicles.
Oh, i understand that and i believe its a great car. But i have definitely noticed more women and younger guys driving them.

But Honestly, if i were to tell you i would buy you any Porsche your heart desired, im almost 100% positive your first choice wouldn't be a boxster.
This is true, but if you told me $150k limit to spend on Porsches, I'd get a Boxster S (maybe Cayman S) plus a Cayenne S together over a GT3.
[/quote]

I'd still take a GT3 RS 4.0 for a few more thousand

http://carandsuv.org/wp-content/uplo...-RS-4.0-01.jpg
http://www.porsche.com/microsite/911gt3rs4/usa.aspx
Reply
Old Jun 29, 2011 | 01:20 PM
  #52  
badboy00z's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,080
Likes: 2
Default

CGT for me. lol
Reply
Old Jun 29, 2011 | 02:10 PM
  #53  
surf40's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by t3am 83rd
Intersted to know what were the pro-Porsche points given by their forum.
Here is what they said

S2000
positives: unmatched chassis rigidity for a convertible, Civic of RWD cars (reliability, build quality, low maintenance, low parts & labor costs), best shifter (THE benchmark period!)
negatives: Civic of RWD cars (not as inspiring as 986), lack of torque, less steering feel than 986, tight cockpit, pitching stock ride on concrete, limits beyond street legal speeds

986S
positives: torque, telepathic handling, cabin space, frunk, more comfortable ride
negatives: rigidity/cowl shake, reliability, high maintenance/repair costs (parts & labor), interior build quality behind the S2000, limits beyond street legal speeds, easy bake oven (trunk), no std LSD
Reply
Old Jun 29, 2011 | 04:34 PM
  #54  
suzukawoods's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 735
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by surf40
Originally Posted by t3am 83rd' timestamp='1309197631' post='20723930
Intersted to know what were the pro-Porsche points given by their forum.
Here is what they said

S2000
positives: unmatched chassis rigidity for a convertible, Civic of RWD cars (reliability, build quality, low maintenance, low parts & labor costs), best shifter (THE benchmark period!)
negatives: Civic of RWD cars (not as inspiring as 986), lack of torque, less steering feel than 986, tight cockpit, pitching stock ride on concrete, limits beyond street legal speeds

986S
positives: torque, telepathic handling, cabin space, frunk, more comfortable ride
negatives: rigidity/cowl shake, reliability, high maintenance/repair costs (parts & labor), interior build quality behind the S2000, limits beyond street legal speeds, easy bake oven (trunk), no std LSD
fair assessment.
Reply
Old Jun 29, 2011 | 04:42 PM
  #55  
Syn's Avatar
Syn
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 1,167
Likes: 1
From: Indiana
Default

Did the interior of the Boxster improve drastically between 2004 and present-day? I've seen two or three people comment on the superior Porsche interior. My mom had an 04 Boxster and the interior was not even close to as nice as my S2000.
Reply
Old Jun 29, 2011 | 05:26 PM
  #56  
IrishInIsengard's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 124
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by surf40
Originally Posted by t3am 83rd' timestamp='1309197631' post='20723930
Intersted to know what were the pro-Porsche points given by their forum.
Here is what they said

S2000
positives: unmatched chassis rigidity for a convertible, Civic of RWD cars (reliability, build quality, low maintenance, low parts & labor costs), best shifter (THE benchmark period!)
negatives: Civic of RWD cars (not as inspiring as 986), lack of torque, less steering feel than 986, tight cockpit, pitching stock ride on concrete, limits beyond street legal speeds

986S
positives: torque, telepathic handling, cabin space, frunk, more comfortable ride
negatives: rigidity/cowl shake, reliability, high maintenance/repair costs (parts & labor), interior build quality behind the S2000, limits beyond street legal speeds, easy bake oven (trunk), no std LSD

Wow. It sounds like this actually sums this up quite well. I will say that since you are looking at used vehicles in the same price range, the S2000 would probably be newer and in overall better shape. As for the reliability in Porsches, the older you get the more likely they are to have problems. Not really a deal-breaker but something to think about.

As for what roadster is better, I feel like it's leads to a muddy conclusion. I chose my S2K over a Miata, but that by no means says that Miata is an inferior car. With every price point, you get more. Miata's are super fun to drive. S2K's are super fun to drive and fast. Porsches are super fun to drive, are fast, and give you a more luxurious feel and ride.

Basically, I don't think any writings will help you. You need to drive both and see what you bond with. You will love both, I guarantee it. Go with your gut man. Best of luck!
Reply
Old Jun 29, 2011 | 05:28 PM
  #57  
vactor's Avatar
Registered User
10 Year Member
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 359
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Syn
Did the interior of the Boxster improve drastically between 2004 and present-day? I've seen two or three people comment on the superior Porsche interior. My mom had an 04 Boxster and the interior was not even close to as nice as my S2000.
yeah, the newer boxsters have been redesigned and are much more like the 997 inside. the interior IS about what you would expect in a $50k car. much much nicer than most things out there, and much nicer than the S2k. but, the S2k is a very ergonomic and comfortable place (if a bit dated) to be, and it's a bit of a shame that honda never stepped up to the plate in an interior refresh over the production decade of the S2k. still, a very well put together car and interior, and the seats are fabulous. but then again, the S2k does come at a price premium. sure, cost no object i'd probably go for a 997turbo convertible or 458 convertible, or whatnot, but in the end, the honda is an amazing amazing car, and still, one of THE BEST driving cars out there. the response and feeling of being at one with the car is truly second to none, even in 2011, at least imho
Reply
Old Jun 29, 2011 | 08:44 PM
  #58  
8escape's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
From: Elk Grove, CA
Default

See all my posts in this thread starting with post #8

http://www.planet-9.com/cayman-boxst...y-porsche.html
Reply
Old Jul 4, 2011 | 09:42 AM
  #59  
Croc's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 3,026
Likes: 10
From: Israel
Default

Originally Posted by surf40
So while my heart draws me to the Boxster, my practical side says get the S2000.
i say go after your heart and buy the car you lust.
Reply
Old Jul 6, 2011 | 09:53 PM
  #60  
Ap2batman's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 397
Likes: 0
Default

buy what you can afford.. simple as that.. not really anything to compare..
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Tomikaze
Introductions
73
Sep 25, 2007 08:48 PM
Archon007
Car and Bike Talk
50
Jan 19, 2006 08:10 PM
Officer_down
Car and Bike Talk
9
Nov 9, 2004 02:01 PM
bhav
Car and Bike Talk
21
Jul 14, 2004 01:53 PM
Freznal
Australia & New Zealand S2000 Owners
12
Apr 8, 2003 03:51 AM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:57 PM.