S2000 Talk Discussions related to the S2000, its ownership and enthusiasm for it.

S2000 vs G35 Coupe

Thread Tools
 
Old Apr 5, 2005 | 08:27 PM
  #11  
Berlina#2290's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 667
Likes: 0
Default

when i went with my friend to the dealership, the dealer came out and asked me if i was looking for "something that will run rings around the s2000" i vomited, then told him i was there with my friend. i love car dealers. obviously in his spare time he was a comedian.
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2005 | 08:34 PM
  #12  
S2KenC's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 2,057
Likes: 0
From: Hacienda Heights, CA
Default

We have both cars in our garage. I have a white 2005 s2k and my brother has a 2004 white G35C 6mt. Not really the same price. G35C cost a little more but then again he opted for the 6 speed and premium package. I like both cars alot. I guess the thing i like most about the S2000 is that it just fits like a glove whereas the G35C drives and feels as big as it is. Admittedly, the G35 does feel stronger and thus more liveable on a daily basis. But nothing beats the feeling of top down driving in a tight convertible especially on a beautiful LA day like today
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2005 | 09:20 PM
  #13  
robotkiller's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 185
Likes: 0
From: JAX
Default

G coupe 6mt is 34,000 without any options. You would have to order it, because no one will carry a "stripped" 6MT. Ordering will take about 3 months.


The going rate for an s2k on the other hand is about 30k.

I was between these two and chose the s2k, obviously. I figured if I'm going to get a sports car, why half-ass it? The G35 seemed too comprimised towards luxury. In the end, it was too small to be a luxury car, too heavy and soft to be a sports car.

The s2000 is a much more intense, visceral drive. The gCoupe essentially drives like a BMW, i.e. competent but a bit dull. The 350z was more entertaining, but I couldn't shake the feeling that it was a great engine wrapped in a cheap car.

Reply
Old Apr 5, 2005 | 10:20 PM
  #14  
Ooalloems2koO's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 6,912
Likes: 0
From: Rowland Heights 626
Default

Originally Posted by robotkiller,Apr 5 2005, 09:20 PM
G coupe 6mt is 34,000 without any options. You would have to order it, because no one will carry a "stripped" 6MT. Ordering will take about 3 months.


The going rate for an s2k on the other hand is about 30k.

I was between these two and chose the s2k, obviously. I figured if I'm going to get a sports car, why half-ass it? The G35 seemed too comprimised towards luxury. In the end, it was too small to be a luxury car, too heavy and soft to be a sports car.

The s2000 is a much more intense, visceral drive. The gCoupe essentially drives like a BMW, i.e. competent but a bit dull. The 350z was more entertaining, but I couldn't shake the feeling that it was a great engine wrapped in a cheap car.
did u just say 350Z is more entertaining?
i dont know about that ......
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2005 | 11:01 PM
  #15  
HelloEvo's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
From: Pasadena, CA
Default

i say keep the s2k
Reply
Old Apr 6, 2005 | 12:22 AM
  #16  
suzukali's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 157
Likes: 0
From: San Francisco
Default

I love the fact that S2000 came with everything i needed in a car , I didnt need to add leather seats , a "performance package" and stuff like that.

I loved driving the G35 coupe , but the car doesnt feel solid to me the way s2k does , I think infinity skimped out in the materials , it feels like you are sitting in a a plastic toy whereas in s2k i feel like i a getting into a real car.

oh and there is always the fun factor of a convertible a coupe can never match
Reply
Old Apr 6, 2005 | 12:51 AM
  #17  
05 S2K Stoner's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 345
Likes: 0
From: Central Jersey
Default

i have both, and drive them both often, the s2k is a overal fun car to drive, the G35 has a "Pimp" factor lol but it drives alot smoother then the s2k... and has alot more little goodies, but i am more of a s2k guy and liek sporty instead of luxery
Reply
Old Apr 6, 2005 | 01:03 AM
  #18  
SECRET AP1's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,133
Likes: 0
From: Northern California
Default

Ever consider the upcoming EVO 8 (or upcoming EVO 9) or the STi? These cars are stupid-fast and the traction control systems in the EVOs are idiot-proof. An EVO 8 with the factory wing deleted looks somewhat tasteful.

I think I'd miss the glove-like feel the S if i sold it, but there are definitely cars out there that are faster and perform just as well if not better in track conditions for the same cost.
Reply
Old Apr 6, 2005 | 02:57 AM
  #19  
robotkiller's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 185
Likes: 0
From: JAX
Default

[QUOTE=Ooalloems2koO,Apr 5 2005, 10:20 PM]did u just say 350Z is more entertaining?
Reply
Old Apr 6, 2005 | 03:12 AM
  #20  
s2000owner's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 208
Likes: 0
From: Arlington, Texas
Default

Originally Posted by blue03s2k,Apr 5 2005, 07:40 PM
do you need a back seat or not... that'll give you your answer
Hell, I'm 16 and 3 months away from driving my S2, and I got friends to haul, but they can kiss it.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:55 PM.