S2000 Talk Discussions related to the S2000, its ownership and enthusiasm for it.

S2000 vs MX-5 - Weight

Thread Tools
 
Old Sep 1, 2010 | 05:58 AM
  #41  
Saki GT's Avatar
Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 36,017
Likes: 226
From: Queen City, NC
Default

That's not the point. The point is, if Honda continued development, it likely would have gotten better at the designs. Without real experience to build upon, its designs are just a "first stab" at doing it.

Mazda has been making Miatas for over 20 years and three product generations; Porsche has been making convertible sports cars for twice as long, and both surely have benefitted from benchmarking their old designs and improving upon them. If Honda actually got into development it would surely improve its original designs, like cutting weight without sacrificing strength in the frame.
Reply
Old Sep 1, 2010 | 06:01 AM
  #42  
iDomN8U's Avatar
Thread Starter
15 Year Member
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 7,430
Likes: 2
From: Ontario
Default

So your guess is that honda has a poor frame design???
Reply
Old Sep 1, 2010 | 06:03 AM
  #43  
Reckon's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 3,792
Likes: 1
From: New Market, AL
Default

Fat chicks need love too? I have to agree that the difference is mostly due to frame design with other portions coming in from various areas (material thickness, liquid hold size, etc.).
Reply
Old Sep 1, 2010 | 06:28 AM
  #44  
JLUDE's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,648
Likes: 1
From: Culpeper Virginia
Default

[QUOTE=Saki GT,Sep 1 2010, 05:51 AM] You can't possibly believe that the S600 had anything to do with modern roadster construction.
Reply
Old Sep 1, 2010 | 08:19 AM
  #45  
Saki GT's Avatar
Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 36,017
Likes: 226
From: Queen City, NC
Default

Originally Posted by iDomN8U,Sep 1 2010, 10:01 AM
So your guess is that honda has a poor frame design???
No, my point it that you don't get what I'm talking about.
Reply
Old Sep 1, 2010 | 08:43 AM
  #46  
Petah78's Avatar
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 323
Likes: 40
Default

Originally Posted by Tanuki,Aug 31 2010, 08:07 PM
Oh, it has an Aluminium engine block also which could be 100lbs differance in the motor alone.
Correct me if i am wrong but i thought the block/head of the F20/F22 is also made aluminum.
Reply
Old Sep 1, 2010 | 09:14 AM
  #47  
Mike21's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,077
Likes: 0
From: Miami, FL
Default

Seriously? They're two different cars. Nothing is the same on either one. If you were trying to figure out why an Integra GSR weighs more than an Integra RS, then you can get some real answers. But they use different engines, transmissions, driveshafts, differentials, suspensions, brakes, frames, body work, etc.

I have an 'experiment' for you. Get two boxes of the same size. Fill one with sand and the other with feathers. "OMG WHY IS ONE HEAVIER THAN THE OTHER??? THEY'RE THE SAME SIZE!!!"

Should I go on?
Reply
Old Sep 1, 2010 | 11:55 AM
  #48  
iDomN8U's Avatar
Thread Starter
15 Year Member
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 7,430
Likes: 2
From: Ontario
Default

Originally Posted by Saki GT,Sep 1 2010, 09:58 AM
That's not the point. The point is, if Honda continued development, it likely would have gotten better at the designs. Without real experience to build upon, its designs are just a "first stab" at doing it.

Mazda has been making Miatas for over 20 years and three product generations; Porsche has been making convertible sports cars for twice as long, and both surely have benefitted from benchmarking their old designs and improving upon them. If Honda actually got into development it would surely improve its original designs, like cutting weight without sacrificing strength in the frame.
Engineering regardless if it's convertible or not; is implemented in each car Honda designs. Maximizing weight reduction to improve fuel efficiency takes high priority.

Can you maximize that it for a convertible, yes perhaps, but do you need 20 years expertise to do it? no (unless you have a very poor engineering team)

Which leads me to another topic, do you take a mazda mx-5 platform and improve it's powerplant to be a competitive track car or take a honda s2000 and maximize weight reduction.

take in the cost of purchase vs modification, one will be cheaper then the other. Sawing holes in the s2000 chassis is extreme method to reducing weight.

Sure this thread will create a slew of half witted comments, but it's something to think about when you want to win races.
Reply
Old Sep 1, 2010 | 12:17 PM
  #49  
Surftile's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
Default






IDON"TWANTITANYLIGHTERISPINOUTASITIS!!!!!!!!!
Reply
Old Sep 1, 2010 | 12:44 PM
  #50  
hicabi's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 425
Likes: 0
Default

[QUOTE=Saki GT,Sep 1 2010, 05:38 AM] Remember, Honda is no pro at making convertibles or sport cars - The S2000 was basically a one-off.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:51 AM.