S2K vs. NSX
Originally Posted by Croc,May 31 2010, 01:40 PM
to be fair we don't know whether all this stuff is still original or was refreshed.
i agree that chance is very very low for the steereing rack - but the rest could be newer.
i agree that chance is very very low for the steereing rack - but the rest could be newer.
There are a lot of variables in comparisons like this, I mean you cannot really say "I was able to keep up with an NSX" just like that. There are a lot of other things that come into play. I was able to keep up with some seriously fast cars in my stock Passat 1.8T on all seasons.
Unless you drove the S2000 back to back on the clock with the NSX I don't think you can just blanket statement like that.
You can say you were unimpressed, but thats about it. But no harm no foul. I think it really, really boils down to the driver, bench racing isn't very accurate, nor helpful.
Unless you drove the S2000 back to back on the clock with the NSX I don't think you can just blanket statement like that.
You can say you were unimpressed, but thats about it. But no harm no foul. I think it really, really boils down to the driver, bench racing isn't very accurate, nor helpful.
Originally Posted by MPosey,May 31 2010, 02:33 PM
There are a lot of variables in comparisons like this, I mean you cannot really say "I was able to keep up with an NSX" just like that. There are a lot of other things that come into play. I was able to keep up with some seriously fast cars in my stock Passat 1.8T on all seasons.
Unless you drove the S2000 back to back on the clock with the NSX I don't think you can just blanket statement like that.
You can say you were unimpressed, but thats about it. But no harm no foul. I think it really, really boils down to the driver, bench racing isn't very accurate, nor helpful.
Unless you drove the S2000 back to back on the clock with the NSX I don't think you can just blanket statement like that.
You can say you were unimpressed, but thats about it. But no harm no foul. I think it really, really boils down to the driver, bench racing isn't very accurate, nor helpful.
Registered User
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 11,074
Likes: 0
From: All up in your inner tubes. Whatcha gonna do sucka?
Originally Posted by MBHs2k,Jun 1 2010, 01:11 AM
He paid close to 30k for it and i just cant justify why that would be worth it.
if I had the means, and the desire to own a second car, I wouldn't mind having one of those in the garage for a sunny sunday afternoon. there's a bit of nostalgic desire for one of those I've had since my youth (and particularly, pulp fiction).
Originally Posted by senor_flojo,May 31 2010, 11:25 PM
that depends on many things, such as condition, mileage, and record keeping. if the mileage was low enough, and maintenance was recorded/saved, I could see someone spending $30k...
if I had the means, and the desire to own a second car, I wouldn't mind having one of those in the garage for a sunny sunday afternoon. there's a bit of nostalgic desire for one of those I've had since my youth (and particularly, pulp fiction).
if I had the means, and the desire to own a second car, I wouldn't mind having one of those in the garage for a sunny sunday afternoon. there's a bit of nostalgic desire for one of those I've had since my youth (and particularly, pulp fiction).
Originally Posted by Deception,Jun 1 2010, 12:43 AM
NSX is overrated
'91 NSX vs any other '91 vehicle.
Ferrari, Porsche, etc. The NSX tore up the track for years in complete stock form. Now is a '91 NSX going to beat a '11 GT2 RS? Of course not.









