S2000 Talk Discussions related to the S2000, its ownership and enthusiasm for it.

Safety

Thread Tools
 
Old Feb 21, 2010 | 02:54 PM
  #21  
i_heart_my_DB8's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 8,586
Likes: 0
From: Scatterbrainia
Default

It's not so much the thought that you would be able to physically move out of the way, it's the idea that you can be pushed out of the way. It may not be by your own doing, however if a car rolls, your body is flexible enough that should you end up upside down, even if unconscious, your torso may bend forward (in a 3 pt. seatbelt) and then all you're supporting is the weight of your body.

If you're strapped into a 5 pt. harness with no proper roll protection, then your body is unable to bend if it needs to. Should you end up upside down without adequate roll protection, there is the possibility that the weight of the car will be on your head, since your upper body is unable to move or be pushed away. Note that Pastrana in your video has adequate roll protection.

Personally, I'm not going to say what anyone should or shouldn't do, but maybe that there are risks to be aware of. If you roll upside down in a 3-pt seatbelt and die, don't come blaming me 'cause I said you'd be safe, and if you're perfectly fine bolted into a 5-pt upside down, more power to you.
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2010 | 06:18 PM
  #22  
CKit's Avatar
Former Moderator
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,729
Likes: 8
Default

4pt without anti-sub belt. No thanks. 6pt for me, thanks.
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2010 | 05:11 AM
  #23  
AngryTurtle's Avatar
Moderator
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 281,961
Likes: 442
From: Charleston, SC. \>
Default

Originally Posted by TopGear,Feb 18 2010, 03:13 PM
On a strictly street driven S, yes. I don't think the added danger of serious injury in minor accidents (from your head hitting the roll bar without a helmet) is worth the gains in roll over safety you get from the roll bar.

Just go look at the S2000 crashes thread in here. Most S2Ks that roll with no roll bar are still safely supported by the windshield frame.

I'd only install a roll bar if I had to do it for track use.
This applies to a roll cage not a roll bar.

Reply
Old Feb 22, 2010 | 05:41 AM
  #24  
bronxbomber252's Avatar
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,865
Likes: 38
Default

In regards to people saying they would be able to move themselves just right in event of an accident. That is a load of BULL. As a Firefighter who has seen numerous accidents and talked to numerous accident victims. And as someone who was hit nearly head on by a drunk driver, I can safely say that no one has that type of reaction time and strength.

One, you are thinking about avoiding the accident not positioning your body. Two in a roll the centrifugal force form the roll and/or the force of the impacts IS going to pull your head up if your trying to hold it down. I don't think people realize the sheer amount of force involved, think about it. unbelted people get thrown out of cars and often land a good distance away, that is a lot more force than you can resist with your neck.

If you want an idea of what it would be like in a 30mph crash, drop somethign the weight of your head off the 3rd or 4th floor of a building and catch it on your head and just try to keep your neck straight. now think about the fact that most rolls are at a higher speed than that.

In reality it is going to be an outside force (IE the ground) that is going to move you out of the way and prevent you from supporting the whole car with your body. if you are trying to hold yourself in one position you are going to be trying to resist far more force than you can handle and are going to get hurt worse

As someone who has seen the aftermath of numerous accidents I will leave you all with this. the smartest thing to do in ANY accident, INCLUDING a rollover in an S, is to go a limp as you can, just ragdoll it. this was your body is not resisting the forces and you are less likely to be seriously hurt. Every seriously injured victim I have pulled out has either A) been a retard and not worn their seatbelt, B) been in a situation where nothing was going to prevent it, or C) tryed to resist the forces of the crash in some way. A and C are avoidable, B is not.
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2010 | 06:10 AM
  #25  
BerlinaBlaster's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 189
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by i_heart_my_DB8,Feb 20 2010, 12:56 AM
Sorry if you lack the self preservation instinct to protect your head in any sort of emergency that most of us are inherently born with.
HAHAHA.

But seriously, a roll-BAR with 3-pt belts (stock) is acceptable for the street for purely roll-over protection. However a CAGE should be used for track duty vehicle with 4+ point harnesses.

All of this is purely my opinion on the matter, but I like to think it counts sometimes
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2010 | 10:16 AM
  #26  
TopGear's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 9,557
Likes: 15
From: MD
Default

Originally Posted by Gigdy,Feb 22 2010, 10:11 AM
This applies to a roll cage not a roll bar.

No need to me.. I stand by what I said. In a comfortable seating position, I'm far enough back to be in danger of hitting my head on the vertical support of the roll bar which would be right over my left shoulder, and close to being flush with the seat.

Sure, that's a LOT less danger than a full cage, but it's still something to smash my head into that wasn't there before.

I wouldn't put a roll bar in my car without a racing seat and a harness.

If you're shorter, I think that danger is seriously reduced.

Of course, this is all just my own, often incorrect opinion. YMMV.
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2010 | 10:46 AM
  #27  
TKim103's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 775
Likes: 0
From: NoVA
Default

I have a roll bar in my street/track car...it improves chassis rigidity and you need one due to regulations
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2010 | 07:48 PM
  #28  
hicabi's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 425
Likes: 0
Default

[QUOTE=i_heart_my_DB8,Feb 19 2010, 01:14 PM]That's what your neck is for.
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2010 | 08:25 PM
  #29  
i_heart_my_DB8's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 8,586
Likes: 0
From: Scatterbrainia
Default

Originally Posted by hicabi,Feb 22 2010, 09:48 PM

One of the funniest remarks I have read in a while... the existence of someone who thinks he can actually do this...
Um... did you read the rest of the thread, particularly where I clarified by saying this?:

[QUOTE=i_heart_my_DB8]It's not so much the thought that you would be able to physically move out of the way, it's the idea that you can be pushed out of the way.
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2010 | 09:17 AM
  #30  
shamoo's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,189
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by bronxbomber252,Feb 22 2010, 10:41 AM
As someone who has seen the aftermath of numerous accidents I will leave you all with this. the smartest thing to do in ANY accident, INCLUDING a rollover in an S, is to go a limp as you can, just ragdoll it. this was your body is not resisting the forces and you are less likely to be seriously hurt. Every seriously injured victim I have pulled out has either A) been a retard and not worn their seatbelt, B) been in a situation where nothing was going to prevent it, or C) tryed to resist the forces of the crash in some way. A and C are avoidable, B is not.
And I think this is exactly what i_heart_my_DB8 is trying to say. Can't really "go limp" when you have a 5pt harness strapping you in. In a stock belt...I can flop around pretty much anywhere.

Anyway, I don't want to beat a dead horse.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:44 PM.