S2000 Talk Discussions related to the S2000, its ownership and enthusiasm for it.

Stock 2.0 and 2.2 Dynos?

Thread Tools
 
Old Nov 7, 2006 | 08:03 AM
  #41  
Shark's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 461
Likes: 0
From: Parkesburg
Default

Originally Posted by sodaking663rd,Nov 7 2006, 10:33 AM

who freakin' cares about hp/ltr?
It's bragging rights!

IMO, the S2000 powerplant is not necessarily the car's highlight. The chassis and gearbox is what really separates this car from the competition. Of course, the engine's lightweight design contributes to the excellent chassis balance, but that comes with a price.

The F20C and F22C are marvels of engineering, but I'd rather an LS2 under the hood.
Reply
Old Nov 7, 2006 | 08:14 AM
  #42  
JDMPONY00's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 242
Likes: 0
Default

The qualm I have is why Honda didn't bump displacement as well as leave the 9k redline then there would be no question which power plant is better. But they didn't so the debate goes on. My reason for getting an ap2 is when am I gonna rev to 9k on the street i much rather have the increased power band and torque since my car sees 99.9% street driving. 9k is spectacular though. If i was spending my time on the track I would w/o a doubt get an 03. So i pretty much comes down to why you are buying the car.
Reply
Old Nov 7, 2006 | 08:29 AM
  #43  
vtec9's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 10,106
Likes: 5
From: Connecticut
Default

Originally Posted by JDMPONY00,Nov 7 2006, 12:14 PM
The qualm I have is why Honda didn't bump displacement as well as leave the 9k redline then there would be no question which power plant is better.
because they increased displacement by lengthening the stroke. longer stroke = further for the pistons to travel in the same amount of time. The piston velocity of the F22C at 8k rpm is just a hair slower than that of the F20C at 9k. revving the F22C to 9k would give it the fastest piston velocity of any production engine (currently held by the engine in the new RS4.. F20C is 2nd, F22C is somewhere around 4th) by far and create more stress on the already beefud up and strong components. It was a question of durability and cost.
Reply
Old Nov 7, 2006 | 08:38 AM
  #44  
HvRRZ's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 5,645
Likes: 8
From: Los Angeles, CA
Default

If you can go with the ap2. Ya so what the ap1 revs to 9K? The ap2 makes power earlier on, and the best part is the ap1 will never be close to the torque numbers the ap2 will put out. Both cars are equal in strenght, but once you start modding the ap2 is going to show better gains, especially in the torque department.

Looks to me like honda was able to up the power of the s2k, and make the power curve much better with the ap2. Not only that but by lowering the redline they got rid of the power drop common in all ap1's after 8K. Same power with no power drop in the ap2, works for me
Reply
Old Nov 7, 2006 | 08:54 AM
  #45  
K-Lo's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 5,175
Likes: 0
From: SIN CITY - Las Vegas
Default

gawd! you AP1 owners are unbelievable! just give up already!

Reply
Old Nov 7, 2006 | 09:02 AM
  #46  
JLUDE's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,648
Likes: 1
From: Culpeper Virginia
Default

Originally Posted by HvRRZ,Nov 7 2006, 09:38 AM
.... Not only that but by lowering the redline they got rid of the power drop common in all ap1's after 8K. Same power with no power drop in the ap2, works for me
except of course that you only get 2K worth of rpms on the VTEC cam lobes instead of 3K.
Reply
Old Nov 7, 2006 | 09:07 AM
  #47  
HvRRZ's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 5,645
Likes: 8
From: Los Angeles, CA
Default

Originally Posted by JLUDE,Nov 7 2006, 11:02 AM
except of course that you only get 2K worth of rpms on the VTEC cam lobes instead of 3K.
name a couple people that start to mod their S and do not drop vtec engagement? It's easy to lower vtec point. Besides that it isn't to hard to get the ap2 revving up to 9K or close to it safely.

I love both motors, but have seen results of both off of mods, and races in different situations. The f22 is the better motor for me. To each his own.
Reply
Old Nov 7, 2006 | 09:18 AM
  #48  
JLUDE's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,648
Likes: 1
From: Culpeper Virginia
Default

Originally Posted by HvRRZ,Nov 7 2006, 10:07 AM
I love both motors, but have seen results of both off of mods, and races in different situations. The f22 is the better motor for me. To each his own.
Yea, those 4 cylinder Accord motors are tanks!



j/k.
Reply
Old Nov 7, 2006 | 09:20 AM
  #49  
HvRRZ's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 5,645
Likes: 8
From: Los Angeles, CA
Default

^
Reply
Old Nov 7, 2006 | 10:29 AM
  #50  
-dc's Avatar
-dc
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
From: Vero Beach
Default

Originally Posted by Chazmo,Nov 7 2006, 02:26 PM
I don't know why some AP1 owners can't concede HP/tq superiority to the AP2... Duh... In a naturally aspirated car like ours, there's no substitute for displacement. And, without some serious race-hardening, you'll never see over 9K in a street engine. So what if the AP2's redline is a little lower.

Numbers-wise, there's no question. The AP2 engine has more power on tap than the AP1. Whether that translates to faster on the track is up to the driver and the course.
I'm an s2000 newbie and not an s2000 owner yet, but I'm trying to make just this decision (AP1 v AP2). From a strictly technical standpoint, I
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:00 AM.