Stock 2.0 and 2.2 Dynos?
Originally Posted by sodaking663rd,Nov 7 2006, 10:33 AM
who freakin' cares about hp/ltr?
IMO, the S2000 powerplant is not necessarily the car's highlight. The chassis and gearbox is what really separates this car from the competition. Of course, the engine's lightweight design contributes to the excellent chassis balance, but that comes with a price.
The F20C and F22C are marvels of engineering, but I'd rather an LS2 under the hood.
The qualm I have is why Honda didn't bump displacement as well as leave the 9k redline then there would be no question which power plant is better. But they didn't so the debate goes on. My reason for getting an ap2 is when am I gonna rev to 9k on the street i much rather have the increased power band and torque since my car sees 99.9% street driving. 9k is spectacular though. If i was spending my time on the track I would w/o a doubt get an 03. So i pretty much comes down to why you are buying the car.
Originally Posted by JDMPONY00,Nov 7 2006, 12:14 PM
The qualm I have is why Honda didn't bump displacement as well as leave the 9k redline then there would be no question which power plant is better.
If you can go with the ap2. Ya so what the ap1 revs to 9K? The ap2 makes power earlier on, and the best part is the ap1 will never be close to the torque numbers the ap2 will put out. Both cars are equal in strenght, but once you start modding the ap2 is going to show better gains, especially in the torque department.
Looks to me like honda was able to up the power of the s2k, and make the power curve much better with the ap2. Not only that but by lowering the redline they got rid of the power drop common in all ap1's after 8K. Same power with no power drop in the ap2, works for me
Looks to me like honda was able to up the power of the s2k, and make the power curve much better with the ap2. Not only that but by lowering the redline they got rid of the power drop common in all ap1's after 8K. Same power with no power drop in the ap2, works for me
Originally Posted by HvRRZ,Nov 7 2006, 09:38 AM
.... Not only that but by lowering the redline they got rid of the power drop common in all ap1's after 8K. Same power with no power drop in the ap2, works for me 

Originally Posted by JLUDE,Nov 7 2006, 11:02 AM
except of course that you only get 2K worth of rpms on the VTEC cam lobes instead of 3K. 
I love both motors, but have seen results of both off of mods, and races in different situations. The f22 is the better motor for me. To each his own.
Originally Posted by HvRRZ,Nov 7 2006, 10:07 AM
I love both motors, but have seen results of both off of mods, and races in different situations. The f22 is the better motor for me. To each his own.
j/k.
Originally Posted by Chazmo,Nov 7 2006, 02:26 PM
I don't know why some AP1 owners can't concede HP/tq superiority to the AP2... Duh... In a naturally aspirated car like ours, there's no substitute for displacement. And, without some serious race-hardening, you'll never see over 9K in a street engine. So what if the AP2's redline is a little lower.
Numbers-wise, there's no question. The AP2 engine has more power on tap than the AP1. Whether that translates to faster on the track is up to the driver and the course.
Numbers-wise, there's no question. The AP2 engine has more power on tap than the AP1. Whether that translates to faster on the track is up to the driver and the course.


