How about me?. I'll be there in MAY. Well heck, I'm in Phoenix at least once a year.
In August, you can fry an egg outside(solar power )
NICK

 

In fact, with a 97+ NSX, you don't need a supercharged S2000. Though a suspension upgrade in the NSX-T would not hurt. Though I think while the added torque and power in the NSX-T may be intoxicating, you will probably find the suspension and chassis less impressive than the S2000's.

 

[QUOTE]Originally posted by s2ktaxi
[B]In fact, with a 97+ NSX, you don't need a supercharged S2000.

 

Anyone interested if you're in Phoenix please look me up I'll be happy to take forum members for a ride.

The reasons for the suspension differences for the T and coupe NSXs is chasis rigidity. With the T the frame of the car has been altered to allow for the t-roof. You lose a lot of stiffness without a roof. With the stiff suspension the car had way too much cowl shake for street driving. They also used thinner sway bars. The coupe is a much better track car. I've ridden/driven both. Mine is a T simply because it is usually just my street car. I use the S2k as my daily driver and track car. The NSX is my weekend car. Sorry for the terrible grammar.

[Edited by SCS2k on 04-16-2001 at 07:05 PM]