S2000 Talk Discussions related to the S2000, its ownership and enthusiasm for it.

Technically a MR2?

Thread Tools
 
Old Apr 29, 2009 | 01:55 PM
  #1  
detonator2x's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 2,372
Likes: 0
From: Moore, OK
Default Technically a MR2?

Okay so I was thinkin about this the other day. Isn't the S2000 "technically" a MR2? Its labeled as a FR class car since the engine is mounted in the front. However, the engine is mounted behind the front axle. And it's a 2 seater. Which, if I'm not mistaken, is the definition of the MR2 (Mid-engine RWD 2 Seater. Some say Midship Runabout 2 str) in Toyota's car. Would I be wrong in saying I have a MR2 again? (I had one of the 1988 SuperCharged ones a few years ago).

Agree? Disagree?
Reply
Old Apr 29, 2009 | 02:00 PM
  #2  
MULDER's Avatar
Community Organizer
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 11,936
Likes: 12
From: Charleston
Default

Hmm... No.

So you had a red apple and traded it for a green apple. Yes, you still end up with an apple, but its not the same as what you had. Make any sense?
Reply
Old Apr 29, 2009 | 02:05 PM
  #3  
jelliotlevy's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 769
Likes: 0
From: Hilton Head Island
Default

The third generation RX-7 also had an engine (rotary) which was completely behind the front axle, but I would like to think that the mid engine terminology is reserved for vehicles with the engine behind the driver, but in front of the rear axle. Let's be grateful that the engine placement of the S2000 gives a near perfect 50/50 weight balance. Perhaps we can refer to it as 'enhanced engine placement,' although I regret raising any politically sensitive phraseology in these days when 'enhanced interrogation techniques' have received so much attention.
Reply
Old Apr 29, 2009 | 02:11 PM
  #4  
electronspeeder's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
From: Bay Area, CA
Default

I think it would be classified as a FMR car (Front-Mid Engine), not MR.
Reply
Old Apr 29, 2009 | 02:15 PM
  #5  
electronspeeder's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
From: Bay Area, CA
Default

Ahh... thanks to Wikipedia, here are other FMR cars:

Aston Martin Vanquish
Aston Martin V8 Vantage (2005)
Bill Thomas Cheetah early-1960s Chevrolet-based GT-prototype race car
Chevrolet Corvette (4th through 6th Generation)
Chevrolet Camaro
Pontiac Firebird
Dodge Viper
Honda S2000
Infiniti G35 and G37
Caterham Seven
Lotus Seven
Ferrari 612 Scaglietti
Maserati Quattroporte
Mazda MX-5 (third generation)
Mazda RX-7
Mazda RX-8
MG ZT (V8 260 only)
Mercedes-Benz SLR McLaren
BMW Z4
Nissan 350Z
Porsche 924
Porsche 928
Porsche 944
Porsche 968
Reliant 3 wheelers[citation needed]
Rover 75 (V8 260 only)
Suzuki Cappuccino
Toyota Previa
Volvo B10M
Volvo B12M
Volvo B58
Reply
Old Apr 29, 2009 | 02:27 PM
  #6  
Elistan's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 15,323
Likes: 28
From: Longmont, CO
Default

Originally Posted by detonator2x,Apr 29 2009, 04:55 PM
Okay so I was thinkin about this the other day. Isn't the S2000 "technically" a MR2? Its labeled as a FR class car since the engine is mounted in the front. However, the engine is mounted behind the front axle. And it's a 2 seater. Which, if I'm not mistaken, is the definition of the MR2 (Mid-engine RWD 2 Seater. Some say Midship Runabout 2 str) in Toyota's car. Would I be wrong in saying I have a MR2 again? (I had one of the 1988 SuperCharged ones a few years ago).

Agree? Disagree?
No. The MR2 was a car made by Toyota. The S2000 is not made by Toyota. The S2000 is not an MR2. No more than it's a Porsche 944, Ferrari 599 or Chevrolet Corvette.
Reply
Old Apr 29, 2009 | 02:28 PM
  #7  
psychoazn's Avatar
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 6,223
Likes: 4
From: Orange County, CA
Default

I think they define it as having the Center of Gravity behind the front axle, as opposed to having the ENTIRE engine behind the front axle...
Reply
Old Apr 29, 2009 | 02:30 PM
  #8  
AP1 Driver's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 105
Likes: 0
From: Goldsboro, NC
Default

I miss my old MR2's. Tell you what though. I dont miss trying to work anywhere on the engine. FMR FTW
Reply
Old Apr 29, 2009 | 02:50 PM
  #9  
hippo and dog's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,453
Likes: 0
From: Sacramento/Elk Grove, CA
Default





they're both red if that makes you feel any better.
Reply
Old Apr 29, 2009 | 03:14 PM
  #10  
jeggy's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 5,157
Likes: 0
Default

the miata's engine is behind the front axle. it's a 2 seater. so the miata is an MR2 as well. so in your eyes, the Miata is an MR2 just as the S2000 is an MR2.

HAHAHAHA Detonator drives a Miata.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:27 AM.