S2000 Talk Discussions related to the S2000, its ownership and enthusiasm for it.

Top speed?

Thread Tools
 
Old May 16, 2006 | 09:51 AM
  #21  
Crazy_Schizo's Avatar
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 8,997
Likes: 80
From: Buffalo, NY
Default

Ok, I'll be the noob and post the question.

What exactly is tire flex/deformation? I'm assuming it is something that happens at higher speeds due to the tire spinning faster, but could someone explain it to me?
Reply
Old May 16, 2006 | 09:55 AM
  #22  
negcamber's Avatar
Former Moderator
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 8,821
Likes: 5
From: Jacksonville, FL
Default

Originally Posted by Wisconsin S2k,May 16 2006, 12:40 PM
it was the radiator cap that pushed it beyond 170.

Just think how much faster he would have gone with the fan switch too!
Reply
Old May 16, 2006 | 09:58 AM
  #23  
vtec9's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 10,106
Likes: 5
From: Connecticut
Default

a tire deforms when its spinning very rapidly.. basically the diameter increases and the contact patch decreases. it is a function of the longitudinal tire stiffness and longitudinal force. it can be calculated with some simple calculus, but requires a lot of measurements
Reply
Old May 16, 2006 | 10:11 AM
  #24  
Crazy_Schizo's Avatar
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 8,997
Likes: 80
From: Buffalo, NY
Default

I've seen that before with the top fuel drag cars, basically it looks like the tire goes from an o to an 0 (well, I'm limited by the characters on a keyboard, but you get the idea)

If the tire diameter increases, the amount of rubber making contact with the road decreases...my question is to how this would affect top speed? Is it due to the fact that there is now less traction? Or is it because you now have a larger diameter tire which in turn is spinning the wheel faster causing a higher reading on the speedometer?

Also, is the magnitude of deformation affected at all by the speed rating on a tire either?

Sorry for all the questions, just trying to learn more here!
Reply
Old May 16, 2006 | 10:13 AM
  #25  
MD06LBP's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 557
Likes: 0
From: Germantown
Default

I had it at 134 and it was still pulling pretty hard. It was 4am and no one was around me on the highway, but still. I had my RSX Type S at 145 indicated though.
Reply
Old May 16, 2006 | 10:17 AM
  #26  
driftsmoke's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Default

your wheels might be out of alighnment (or however you spell it) so you might want to get that checked out.
Reply
Old May 16, 2006 | 10:22 AM
  #27  
MD06LBP's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 557
Likes: 0
From: Germantown
Default

Originally Posted by Crazy_Schizo,May 16 2006, 10:11 AM
I've seen that before with the top fuel drag cars, basically it looks like the tire goes from an o to an 0 (well, I'm limited by the characters on a keyboard, but you get the idea)

If the tire diameter increases, the amount of rubber making contact with the road decreases...my question is to how this would affect top speed? Is it due to the fact that there is now less traction? Or is it because you now have a larger diameter tire which in turn is spinning the wheel faster causing a higher reading on the speedometer?

Also, is the magnitude of deformation affected at all by the speed rating on a tire either?

Sorry for all the questions, just trying to learn more here!
Also, if I'm thinking correctly, tire deformation = less tire width = less friction.
Reply
Old May 16, 2006 | 10:25 AM
  #28  
driftsmoke's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by MD06LBP,May 16 2006, 10:22 AM
Also, if I'm thinking correctly, tire deformation = less tire width = less friction.
which might actually make it faster in theory
Reply
Old May 16, 2006 | 10:26 AM
  #29  
sahtt's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 3,409
Likes: 0
Default

Correct, less width, larger total diameter, therefore taller gearing and a higher top speed. It seems these guys are well aware of this and already incorporated it into their estimates. Most lower profile tires do not have a huge degree of tire deformation anyhow. It's wide tires with tall sidewalls that 'suffer' most from it.

As far as traction/friction go, there is technically the same amount of contact patches hitting the concrete, though I guess theoretically they would be condensed. I don't think it would be significant enough to cause problems on lower profile tires.
Reply
Old May 16, 2006 | 10:28 AM
  #30  
driftsmoke's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by sahtt,May 16 2006, 10:26 AM
Correct, less width, larger total diameter, therefore taller gearing and a higher top speed. It seems these guys are well aware of this and already incorporated it into their estimates. Most lower profile tires do not have a huge degree of tire deformation anyhow. It's wide tires with tall sidewalls that 'suffer' most from it.

As far as traction/friction go, there is technically the same amount of contact patches hitting the concrete, though I guess theoretically they would be condensed. I don't think it would be significant enough to cause problems on lower profile tires.
the s2k tires are pretty low profile so i don't think it would matter to much for our cars, just a thought
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:25 AM.