S2000 Talk Discussions related to the S2000, its ownership and enthusiasm for it.

Top Speed in Each Gear AP2?

Thread Tools
 
Old May 18, 2006 | 03:02 PM
  #21  
iam7head's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 5,692
Likes: 3
From: Pasadena, SOCAL
Default

Originally Posted by Scot,May 18 2006, 07:02 AM
that can't be right! 151mph top speed. AP1 doesn't hit the rev limiter until about 165-170mph.....
that's for ap2, which the maker of this post ask.

It just a simple answer, don't take it so complicated.

He ask, i answered. that's that
Reply
Old May 18, 2006 | 04:00 PM
  #22  
QUIKAG's Avatar
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 9,510
Likes: 478
From: Dallas
Default

For 3rd gear in an AP2, don't shift to 3rd if you're over 72mph and 4th gear, it's not worth it if you're over 93ish mph.

Redline 3rd gear: 78mph (roughly)
Redline 4th gear: 99mph (roughly)
Reply
Old May 18, 2006 | 04:07 PM
  #23  
Scot's Avatar
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 17,288
Likes: 39
From: Nashville
Default

Originally Posted by iam7head,May 18 2006, 06:02 PM
that's for ap2, which the maker of this post ask.

It just a simple answer, don't take it so complicated.

He ask, i answered. that's that
I already stated that I learned something new today.....so.... don't "TAKE" it so complicated......
Reply
Old May 18, 2006 | 04:10 PM
  #24  
trapper's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 2,408
Likes: 14
From: Exeter, NH
Default

Reply
Old May 18, 2006 | 04:51 PM
  #25  
DERF's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,881
Likes: 0
From: Da Zoo
Default

Originally Posted by xviper,May 18 2006, 02:45 PM
The car simply doesn't have the power to go any faster than about 150.
163










































































OK, I was on a Little Hill in Da Smokies but I had 200lbs of extra crap in Da Trunk.
Reply
Old May 18, 2006 | 06:44 PM
  #26  
Carbon Blue's Avatar
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 4,318
Likes: 28
From: CA, San Diego,
Default

Originally Posted by TRDLiquidSilver,May 18 2006, 01:45 PM
carlos: you blew my cover, thanks! j/k

doing great! sold the IS last month and picked up an S2K the following day. i thought i wouldn't miss a high revving motor but i was wrong. the IS was fun to drive in the twisties but it was a little boring to cruise in. you still have the celica? man, you get around the boards!
hahaha, yea man still got the celica.
Reply
Old May 18, 2006 | 06:49 PM
  #27  
xviper's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 37,305
Likes: 18
Default

Originally Posted by DERF,May 18 2006, 05:51 PM
OK, I was on a Little Hill in Da Smokies but I had 200lbs of extra crap in Da Trunk.
Physical laws of nature would indicate that the heavier the object, the better it goes downhill. Having "crap" in your trunk would not be considered a disadvantage in your scenario.
Remember my other statement? ....................................

On a straight and level road, with no wind, the average S2000 has enough power to propel itself to about 150 mph. This has been quite evident as witnessed by many AP1 cars that are geared for around 165 mph. The car simply doesn't have the power to go any faster than about 150. Those who have, have been going downhill or have the wind at their backs or a bit of both.
Reply
Old May 18, 2006 | 09:13 PM
  #28  
TRDLiquidSilver's Avatar
Thread Starter
15 Year Member
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,541
Likes: 19
From: NYC to SoCal
Default

i can't believe it! if the chart below is accurate then i'm somewhat dissappointed with the AP2 gearing. 3rd gear 79mph@8200rpms and 4th gear 101@8200. that's far off from 3rd@91mph and 4th@118mph with the AP1. cars like the S2k, celica gts, itr, rsx were already sprinters, with this gearing it makes it even more so. plus the shorter powerband of 6000-8200 vs 6000-9100 there's even less fun.


Reply
Old May 19, 2006 | 06:03 AM
  #29  
trapper's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 2,408
Likes: 14
From: Exeter, NH
Default

Originally Posted by TRDLiquidSilver,May 19 2006, 12:13 AM
i can't believe it! if the chart below is accurate....
I try very hard not to post inaccurate information.

We can argue over whether the "Primary Gear Reduction" is 1.206 [ Turn Zero] or 1.208 [Two Honda Publications] and whether the "6th Gear Transmission Ratio" is 0.765 [Turn Zero] or 0.763 [Two Honda Publications]. Unless you're a real fanatic those differences are negligible.

Check it out for yourself. See URL below.


http://www.turnzero.com/technical_resource...gear_calculator
Reply
Old May 19, 2006 | 06:30 AM
  #30  
QUIKAG's Avatar
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 9,510
Likes: 478
From: Dallas
Default

Originally Posted by TRDLiquidSilver,May 18 2006, 09:13 PM
i can't believe it! if the chart below is accurate then i'm somewhat dissappointed with the AP2 gearing. 3rd gear 79mph@8200rpms and 4th gear 101@8200. that's far off from 3rd@91mph and 4th@118mph with the AP1. cars like the S2k, celica gts, itr, rsx were already sprinters, with this gearing it makes it even more so. plus the shorter powerband of 6000-8200 vs 6000-9100 there's even less fun.
Yeah, my '05 sucks too. You should trade your '06 in for an '03, so you can have more fun with the longer gearing and more rpm in VTEC.

Of course, your comment that the celica GTS, ITR, RSX, and S2k being sprinters removes all doubt about your intelligence or lack thereof.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:23 PM.